Methenamine for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Helen Sweiss, Suverta Bhayana, Reed Hall, Joelle Nelson, Elisabeth Kincaide
{"title":"Methenamine for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Helen Sweiss,&nbsp;Suverta Bhayana,&nbsp;Reed Hall,&nbsp;Joelle Nelson,&nbsp;Elisabeth Kincaide","doi":"10.1177/15269248211064880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent urinary tract infections remain a challenge in solid organ transplant and have a negative impact on morbidity/mortality.</p><p><strong>Project aim: </strong>The purpose of this program evaluation was to determine the impact of methenamine on recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective review included patients > 18 years of age who received a kidney or liver-kidney transplant. Patients were divided into the following groups: (1) Methenamine therapy initiation received methenamine for ≥ 180 days or (2) Non-methenamine therapy: did not receive recurrent urinary tract infection prophylaxis. A total of 60 patients were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing outcomes between methenamine therapy initiation and non-methenamine therapy group, a significant reduction in the rate of recurrent urinary tract infection was reported in the methenamine therapy initiation group (0.6 vs 1.3 per 180 patient days follow-up, P = 0.0005). A significant reduction was also noted with rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria, treatment failures, bacteremia, hospitalizations due to recurrent urinary tract infection, multi-drug resistant organism isolated, and the average duration of antibiotic use. A significant difference in the time to failure of methenamine therapy initiation versus non-methenamine therapy is noted up to 180 patient-days follow-up (RR 1.56, P = 0.0019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation supported methenamine therapy for recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant. The most significant impact of methenamine recurrent urinary tract infection was seen in the first 30 days after initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":346415,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248211064880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent urinary tract infections remain a challenge in solid organ transplant and have a negative impact on morbidity/mortality.

Project aim: The purpose of this program evaluation was to determine the impact of methenamine on recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant recipients.

Design: This retrospective review included patients > 18 years of age who received a kidney or liver-kidney transplant. Patients were divided into the following groups: (1) Methenamine therapy initiation received methenamine for ≥ 180 days or (2) Non-methenamine therapy: did not receive recurrent urinary tract infection prophylaxis. A total of 60 patients were included.

Results: When comparing outcomes between methenamine therapy initiation and non-methenamine therapy group, a significant reduction in the rate of recurrent urinary tract infection was reported in the methenamine therapy initiation group (0.6 vs 1.3 per 180 patient days follow-up, P = 0.0005). A significant reduction was also noted with rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria, treatment failures, bacteremia, hospitalizations due to recurrent urinary tract infection, multi-drug resistant organism isolated, and the average duration of antibiotic use. A significant difference in the time to failure of methenamine therapy initiation versus non-methenamine therapy is noted up to 180 patient-days follow-up (RR 1.56, P = 0.0019).

Conclusion: This evaluation supported methenamine therapy for recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant. The most significant impact of methenamine recurrent urinary tract infection was seen in the first 30 days after initiation.

甲基苯丙胺治疗实体器官移植术后复发性尿路感染。
导论:复发性尿路感染仍然是实体器官移植的一个挑战,并对发病率/死亡率产生负面影响。项目目的:本项目评估的目的是确定甲基苯丙胺对肾和肝肾移植受者复发性尿路感染的影响。设计:本回顾性研究包括18岁以上接受肾脏或肝肾移植的患者。患者分为以下两组:(1)甲基苯丙胺治疗开始时接受甲基苯丙胺治疗≥180天;(2)非甲基苯丙胺治疗:未接受复发性尿路感染预防。共纳入60例患者。结果:当比较甲基苯丙胺开始治疗组和非甲基苯丙胺治疗组的结果时,甲基苯丙胺开始治疗组的尿路感染复发率显著降低(0.6 vs 1.3 / 180患者天随访,P = 0.0005)。无症状菌尿、治疗失败、菌血症、因复发性尿路感染而住院、分离出的多重耐药菌和抗生素使用的平均持续时间也显著减少。与非甲基苯丙胺治疗相比,甲基苯丙胺治疗开始失败的时间在180患者天的随访中有显著差异(RR 1.56, P = 0.0019)。结论:本评价支持甲基苯丙胺治疗肾脏和肝肾移植术后复发性尿路感染。甲基苯丙胺复发性尿路感染的影响在开始治疗后的前30天最为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信