Lift the Veil of Breast Cancers Using 4 or Fewer Critical Genes.

IF 2.5 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2022-02-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11769351221076360
Zhengjun Zhang
{"title":"Lift the Veil of Breast Cancers Using 4 or Fewer Critical Genes.","authors":"Zhengjun Zhang","doi":"10.1177/11769351221076360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Known genes in the breast cancer study literature could not be confirmed whether they are vital to breast cancer formations due to lack of convincing accuracy, although they may be biologically directly related to breast cancer based on present biological knowledge. It is hoped vital genes can be identified with the highest possible accuracy, for example, 100% accuracy and convincing causal patterns beyond what has been known in breast cancer. One hope is that finding gene-gene interaction signatures and functional effects may solve the puzzle. This research uses a recently developed competing linear factor analysis method in differentially expressed gene detection to advance the study of breast cancer formation. Surprisingly, 3 genes are detected to be differentially expressed in TNBC and non-TNBC (Her2, Luminal A, Luminal B) samples with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 study of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC, with 54 675 genes and 265 samples). These 3 genes show a clear signature pattern of how TNBC patients can be grouped. For another TNBC study (with 54 673 genes and 66 samples), 4 genes bring the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Four genes are found to have the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 breast cancer study (with 54 675 genes and 121 samples), and the same 4 genes bring an accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity in the fourth breast cancer study (with 60 483 genes and 1217 samples). These results show the 4-gene-based classifiers are robust and accurate. The detected genes naturally classify patients into subtypes, for example, 7 subtypes. These findings demonstrate the clearest gene-gene interaction patterns and functional effects with the smallest numbers of genes and the highest accuracy compared with findings reported in the literature. The 4 genes are considered to be essential for breast cancer studies and practice. They can provide focused, targeted researches and precision medicine for each subtype of breast cancer. New breast cancer disease types may be detected using the classified subtypes, and hence new effective therapies can be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":35418,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"11769351221076360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/27/10.1177_11769351221076360.PMC8851495.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11769351221076360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Known genes in the breast cancer study literature could not be confirmed whether they are vital to breast cancer formations due to lack of convincing accuracy, although they may be biologically directly related to breast cancer based on present biological knowledge. It is hoped vital genes can be identified with the highest possible accuracy, for example, 100% accuracy and convincing causal patterns beyond what has been known in breast cancer. One hope is that finding gene-gene interaction signatures and functional effects may solve the puzzle. This research uses a recently developed competing linear factor analysis method in differentially expressed gene detection to advance the study of breast cancer formation. Surprisingly, 3 genes are detected to be differentially expressed in TNBC and non-TNBC (Her2, Luminal A, Luminal B) samples with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 study of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC, with 54 675 genes and 265 samples). These 3 genes show a clear signature pattern of how TNBC patients can be grouped. For another TNBC study (with 54 673 genes and 66 samples), 4 genes bring the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Four genes are found to have the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 breast cancer study (with 54 675 genes and 121 samples), and the same 4 genes bring an accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity in the fourth breast cancer study (with 60 483 genes and 1217 samples). These results show the 4-gene-based classifiers are robust and accurate. The detected genes naturally classify patients into subtypes, for example, 7 subtypes. These findings demonstrate the clearest gene-gene interaction patterns and functional effects with the smallest numbers of genes and the highest accuracy compared with findings reported in the literature. The 4 genes are considered to be essential for breast cancer studies and practice. They can provide focused, targeted researches and precision medicine for each subtype of breast cancer. New breast cancer disease types may be detected using the classified subtypes, and hence new effective therapies can be developed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用4个或更少的关键基因揭开乳腺癌的面纱。
乳腺癌研究文献中的已知基因由于缺乏令人信服的准确性,无法证实它们是否对乳腺癌的形成至关重要,尽管根据现有的生物学知识,它们可能与乳腺癌有生物学上的直接关系。人们希望能够尽可能准确地识别关键基因,例如,100%的准确率和令人信服的因果模式,而不是已知的乳腺癌。一个希望是,找到基因-基因相互作用的特征和功能效应可能会解决这个难题。本研究采用一种最新发展的线性因子分析方法在差异表达基因检测中推进乳腺癌形成的研究。令人惊讶的是,在一项三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC, 54 675个基因,265个样本)的研究中,有3个基因在TNBC和非TNBC中差异表达(Her2, Luminal A, Luminal B),其敏感性为100%,特异性为100%。这3个基因显示了TNBC患者如何分组的明确特征模式。在另一项TNBC研究中(54 673个基因和66个样本),4个基因带来100%敏感性和100%特异性的相同准确性。在1项乳腺癌研究(54 675个基因,121个样本)中发现4个基因具有100%敏感性和100%特异性的相同准确性,在第4项乳腺癌研究(60 483个基因,1217个样本)中发现相同的4个基因具有100%敏感性和96.5%特异性的准确性。这些结果表明,基于4基因的分类器具有鲁棒性和准确性。检测到的基因自然地将患者分为亚型,例如7个亚型。与文献报道的结果相比,这些发现以最少的基因数量和最高的准确性展示了最清晰的基因-基因相互作用模式和功能效应。这四种基因被认为对乳腺癌的研究和实践至关重要。他们可以为每一种乳腺癌亚型提供有针对性的研究和精准医疗。使用分类亚型可以发现新的乳腺癌疾病类型,从而可以开发新的有效治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Informatics
Cancer Informatics Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The field of cancer research relies on advances in many other disciplines, including omics technology, mass spectrometry, radio imaging, computer science, and biostatistics. Cancer Informatics provides open access to peer-reviewed high-quality manuscripts reporting bioinformatics analysis of molecular genetics and/or clinical data pertaining to cancer, emphasizing the use of machine learning, artificial intelligence, statistical algorithms, advanced imaging techniques, data visualization, and high-throughput technologies. As the leading journal dedicated exclusively to the report of the use of computational methods in cancer research and practice, Cancer Informatics leverages methodological improvements in systems biology, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and molecular biochemistry into the fields of cancer detection, treatment, classification, risk-prediction, prevention, outcome, and modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信