Informatics Competency Measurement Instruments for Nursing Students: A Rapid Review.

Kalpana Raghunathan, Lisa McKenna, Monica Peddle
{"title":"Informatics Competency Measurement Instruments for Nursing Students: A Rapid Review.","authors":"Kalpana Raghunathan,&nbsp;Lisa McKenna,&nbsp;Monica Peddle","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000000860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital transformation in healthcare impacts curricula preparation and work readiness of future health professionals. Informatics capabilities are essential practice attributes. Therefore, measurement of these competencies is important as students transition from education to practice. This rapid review, conducted according to Cochrane and World Health Organization guidelines, examined validity and reliability measurements of existing instruments used to self-assess nursing informatics competencies. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched. Empirical studies with the primary aim of measuring informatics competencies reporting psychometric assessment were included. Methodological quality appraisal involved predetermined criteria based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments taxonomy. Data extraction and critical appraisal of six studies from four countries identified five instruments. Study characteristics, constructs measured, population, instrument type, and psychometric properties of interest were examined. There were some similarities and differences with instrumentation. Two important measurement properties, content validity and reliability, were underreported. Gaps in key measurement properties were identified, which require further research. Selection of a practical evaluative instrument to implement should also consider the constructs measured, and practicality and feasibility of the instrument for its suitability in different settings. A larger investigation comparing more informatics competency assessment instruments is necessary for an exhaustive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":"466-477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Digital transformation in healthcare impacts curricula preparation and work readiness of future health professionals. Informatics capabilities are essential practice attributes. Therefore, measurement of these competencies is important as students transition from education to practice. This rapid review, conducted according to Cochrane and World Health Organization guidelines, examined validity and reliability measurements of existing instruments used to self-assess nursing informatics competencies. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched. Empirical studies with the primary aim of measuring informatics competencies reporting psychometric assessment were included. Methodological quality appraisal involved predetermined criteria based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments taxonomy. Data extraction and critical appraisal of six studies from four countries identified five instruments. Study characteristics, constructs measured, population, instrument type, and psychometric properties of interest were examined. There were some similarities and differences with instrumentation. Two important measurement properties, content validity and reliability, were underreported. Gaps in key measurement properties were identified, which require further research. Selection of a practical evaluative instrument to implement should also consider the constructs measured, and practicality and feasibility of the instrument for its suitability in different settings. A larger investigation comparing more informatics competency assessment instruments is necessary for an exhaustive analysis.

护生信息学能力测量工具:快速回顾。
医疗保健领域的数字化转型影响着未来卫生专业人员的课程准备和工作准备。信息学能力是基本的实践属性。因此,在学生从教育过渡到实践的过程中,测量这些能力是很重要的。根据Cochrane和世界卫生组织指南进行的快速回顾,检查了用于自我评估护理信息学能力的现有工具的有效性和可靠性测量。检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE和PubMed数据库。以测量信息学能力报告心理测量评估为主要目的的实证研究包括在内。方法学质量评价涉及基于基于共识的卫生测量仪器分类选择标准的预定标准。对来自四个国家的六项研究的数据提取和批判性评价确定了五种工具。研究特征、测量结构、人口、工具类型和感兴趣的心理测量特性进行了检查。在仪表方面有一些相似之处和不同之处。两个重要的测量属性,内容效度和信度,被低估了。确定了关键测量特性的差距,需要进一步研究。选择实用的评估工具还应考虑测量的结构,以及该工具在不同环境中的适用性的实用性和可行性。一个更大的调查比较更多的信息学能力评估工具是必要的详尽的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信