First responder systems can stay operational under pandemic conditions: results of a European survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Camilla Metelmann, Bibiana Metelmann, Michael P Müller, Bernd W Böttiger, Georg Trummer, Karl Christian Thies
{"title":"First responder systems can stay operational under pandemic conditions: results of a European survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Camilla Metelmann,&nbsp;Bibiana Metelmann,&nbsp;Michael P Müller,&nbsp;Bernd W Böttiger,&nbsp;Georg Trummer,&nbsp;Karl Christian Thies","doi":"10.1186/s13049-022-00998-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dispatching first responders (FR) to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in addition to the emergency medical service has shown to increase survival. The promising development of FR systems over the past years has been challenged by the outbreak of COVID-19. Whilst increased numbers and worse outcomes of cardiac arrests during the pandemic suggest a need for expansion of FR schemes, appropriate risk management is required to protect first responders and patients from contracting COVID-19. This study investigated how European FR schemes were affected by the pandemic and what measures were taken to protect patients and responders from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify FR schemes in Europe we conducted a literature search and a web search. The schemes were contacted and invited to answer an online questionnaire during the second wave of the pandemic (December 2020/ January 2021) in Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have identified 135 FR schemes in 28 countries and included responses from 47 FR schemes in 16 countries. 25 schemes reported deactivation due to COVID-19 at some point, whilst 22 schemes continued to operate throughout the pandemic. 39 schemes communicated a pandemic-specific algorithm to their first responders. Before the COVID-19 outbreak 20 FR systems did not provide any personal protective equipment (PPE). After the outbreak 19 schemes still did not provide any PPE. The majority of schemes experienced falling numbers of accepted call outs and decreasing registrations of new volunteers. Six schemes reported of FR having contracted COVID-19 on a mission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>European FR schemes were considerably affected by the pandemic and exhibited a range of responses to protect patients and responders. Overall, FR schemes saw a decrease in activity, which was in stark contrast to the high demand caused by the increased incidence and mortality of OHCA during the pandemic. Given the important role FR play in the chain of survival, a balanced approach upholding the safety of patients and responders should be sought to keep FR schemes operational.</p>","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857892/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-00998-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Dispatching first responders (FR) to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in addition to the emergency medical service has shown to increase survival. The promising development of FR systems over the past years has been challenged by the outbreak of COVID-19. Whilst increased numbers and worse outcomes of cardiac arrests during the pandemic suggest a need for expansion of FR schemes, appropriate risk management is required to protect first responders and patients from contracting COVID-19. This study investigated how European FR schemes were affected by the pandemic and what measures were taken to protect patients and responders from COVID-19.

Methods: To identify FR schemes in Europe we conducted a literature search and a web search. The schemes were contacted and invited to answer an online questionnaire during the second wave of the pandemic (December 2020/ January 2021) in Europe.

Results: We have identified 135 FR schemes in 28 countries and included responses from 47 FR schemes in 16 countries. 25 schemes reported deactivation due to COVID-19 at some point, whilst 22 schemes continued to operate throughout the pandemic. 39 schemes communicated a pandemic-specific algorithm to their first responders. Before the COVID-19 outbreak 20 FR systems did not provide any personal protective equipment (PPE). After the outbreak 19 schemes still did not provide any PPE. The majority of schemes experienced falling numbers of accepted call outs and decreasing registrations of new volunteers. Six schemes reported of FR having contracted COVID-19 on a mission.

Conclusions: European FR schemes were considerably affected by the pandemic and exhibited a range of responses to protect patients and responders. Overall, FR schemes saw a decrease in activity, which was in stark contrast to the high demand caused by the increased incidence and mortality of OHCA during the pandemic. Given the important role FR play in the chain of survival, a balanced approach upholding the safety of patients and responders should be sought to keep FR schemes operational.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

第一反应系统可以在大流行条件下保持运行:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的欧洲调查结果。
背景:除了紧急医疗服务外,向院外心脏骤停派遣第一响应者(FR)已被证明可以提高生存率。过去几年,FR系统的发展前景受到COVID-19疫情的挑战。虽然大流行期间心脏骤停人数的增加和结果的恶化表明有必要扩大应急计划,但需要进行适当的风险管理,以保护急救人员和患者免受COVID-19感染。本研究调查了欧洲FR计划如何受到大流行的影响,以及采取了哪些措施来保护患者和响应者免受COVID-19的影响。方法:为了确定欧洲的FR方案,我们进行了文献检索和网络检索。在欧洲大流行第二波(2020年12月/ 2021年1月)期间,联系了这些计划,并邀请他们回答一份在线问卷。结果:我们确定了28个国家的135个FR计划,并纳入了16个国家的47个FR计划的响应。据报告,有25个计划因COVID-19在某个时候停止运作,而22个计划在整个大流行期间继续运作。39个方案向其第一响应者传达了特定于大流行的算法。在2019冠状病毒病暴发之前,20个FR系统未提供任何个人防护装备(PPE)。疫情爆发后,19个计划仍未提供任何个人防护装备。大多数计划都经历了接受征集的人数下降和新志愿者登记人数减少的情况。六个计划报告FR在执行任务时感染了COVID-19。结论:欧洲FR计划受到大流行的严重影响,并表现出一系列保护患者和应答者的反应。总体而言,FR计划的活动减少,这与大流行期间OHCA发病率和死亡率增加造成的高需求形成鲜明对比。鉴于FR在生存链中发挥的重要作用,应寻求一种平衡的方法来维护患者和应答者的安全,以保持FR计划的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信