The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results.

Fabrice Vallée, Hélène Nougue, Jérome Cartailler, Paul Robert Koundé, Alexandre Mebazaa, Etienne Gayat, Philippe Azouvi, Joaquim Mateo
{"title":"The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results.","authors":"Fabrice Vallée,&nbsp;Hélène Nougue,&nbsp;Jérome Cartailler,&nbsp;Paul Robert Koundé,&nbsp;Alexandre Mebazaa,&nbsp;Etienne Gayat,&nbsp;Philippe Azouvi,&nbsp;Joaquim Mateo","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000003515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing neurological prognoses in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains challenging. To help physicians in the early management of severe TBI, we have designed a visual score (ICEBERG score) including multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria. We evaluated the ICEBERG scores among patients with severe TBI to predict the 28-day mortality and long-term disability (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score at 3 years). In addition, we made a preliminary assessment of the nurses and doctors on the uptake and reception to the use of the ICEBERG visual tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was part of a larger prospective cohort study of 207 patients with severe TBI in the Parisian region (PariS-TBI study). The ICEBERG score included six variables from multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria: cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, body temperature, sedation depth, arterial partial pressure of CO 2 , and blood osmolarity. The primary outcome measures included the ICEBERG score and its relationship with hospital mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hospital mortality was 21% (45/207). The ICEBERG score baseline value and changes during the 72nd first hours were more strongly associated with TBI prognosis than the ICEBERG parameters measured individually. Interestingly, when the clinical and computed tomography parameters at admission were combined with the ICEBERG score at 48 hours using a multimodal approach, the predictive value was significantly increased (area under the curve = 0.92). Furthermore, comparing the ICEBERG visual representation with the traditional numerical readout revealed that changes in patient vitals were more promptly detected using ICEBERG representation ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICEBERG score could represent a simple and effective method to describe severity in TBI patients, where a high score is associated with increased mortality and disability. In addition, ICEBERG representation could enhance the recognition of unmet therapeutic goals and dynamic evolution of the patient's condition. These preliminary results must be confirmed in a prospective manner.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"229-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Establishing neurological prognoses in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains challenging. To help physicians in the early management of severe TBI, we have designed a visual score (ICEBERG score) including multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria. We evaluated the ICEBERG scores among patients with severe TBI to predict the 28-day mortality and long-term disability (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score at 3 years). In addition, we made a preliminary assessment of the nurses and doctors on the uptake and reception to the use of the ICEBERG visual tool.

Methods: This study was part of a larger prospective cohort study of 207 patients with severe TBI in the Parisian region (PariS-TBI study). The ICEBERG score included six variables from multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria: cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, body temperature, sedation depth, arterial partial pressure of CO 2 , and blood osmolarity. The primary outcome measures included the ICEBERG score and its relationship with hospital mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Score.

Results: The hospital mortality was 21% (45/207). The ICEBERG score baseline value and changes during the 72nd first hours were more strongly associated with TBI prognosis than the ICEBERG parameters measured individually. Interestingly, when the clinical and computed tomography parameters at admission were combined with the ICEBERG score at 48 hours using a multimodal approach, the predictive value was significantly increased (area under the curve = 0.92). Furthermore, comparing the ICEBERG visual representation with the traditional numerical readout revealed that changes in patient vitals were more promptly detected using ICEBERG representation ( p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The ICEBERG score could represent a simple and effective method to describe severity in TBI patients, where a high score is associated with increased mortality and disability. In addition, ICEBERG representation could enhance the recognition of unmet therapeutic goals and dynamic evolution of the patient's condition. These preliminary results must be confirmed in a prospective manner.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.

冰山:追踪创伤性脑损伤严重程度的评分和视觉表现:设计原则和初步结果。
背景:建立创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的神经预后仍然具有挑战性。为了帮助医生在早期处理严重的TBI,我们设计了一个视觉评分(冰山评分),包括多模式监测和治疗相关标准。我们评估了严重TBI患者的ICEBERG评分,以预测28天死亡率和长期残疾(3年扩展格拉斯哥结局量表评分)。此外,我们对护士和医生对ICEBERG可视化工具的使用和接受情况进行了初步评估。方法:该研究是巴黎地区207例严重TBI患者的大型前瞻性队列研究(PariS-TBI研究)的一部分。ICEBERG评分包括来自多模式监测和治疗相关标准的六个变量:脑灌注压、颅内压、体温、镇静深度、动脉CO 2分压和血液渗透压。主要结局指标包括ICEBERG评分及其与医院死亡率的关系和扩展格拉斯哥结局评分。结果:住院死亡率为21%(45/207)。与单独测量的ICEBERG参数相比,ICEBERG评分基线值和第72小时内的变化与TBI预后的相关性更强。有趣的是,当使用多模式方法将入院时的临床和计算机断层扫描参数与48小时时的ICEBERG评分相结合时,预测值显着增加(曲线下面积= 0.92)。此外,将ICEBERG可视化表示与传统的数字读数进行比较,发现使用ICEBERG表示可以更及时地检测到患者生命体征的变化(p < 0.05)。结论:ICEBERG评分可以作为一种简单有效的方法来描述TBI患者的严重程度,其中高分与死亡率和致残率增加有关。此外,ICEBERG表征可以增强对未实现治疗目标和患者病情动态演变的认识。这些初步结果必须以一种前瞻性的方式加以证实。证据水平:诊断测试或标准;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信