The curious case of left-wing authoritarianism: When authoritarian persons meet anti-authoritarian norms

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lucian Gideon Conway III, James D. McFarland, Thomas H. Costello, Scott O. Lilienfeld
{"title":"The curious case of left-wing authoritarianism: When authoritarian persons meet anti-authoritarian norms","authors":"Lucian Gideon Conway III,&nbsp;James D. McFarland,&nbsp;Thomas H. Costello,&nbsp;Scott O. Lilienfeld","doi":"10.1002/jts5.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives by proposing that ideologically based authoritarian <i>norms</i> are sometimes in conflict with the processes that create authoritarian <i>individuals</i>. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms <i>are</i> more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian attributes can occur in both conservatives <i>and</i> liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in <i>conflict</i>. We review existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by considering the model's place in current research on the complexities of ideology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"423-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.108","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives by proposing that ideologically based authoritarian norms are sometimes in conflict with the processes that create authoritarian individuals. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms are more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian attributes can occur in both conservatives and liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in conflict. We review existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by considering the model's place in current research on the complexities of ideology.

左翼威权主义的奇特案例:当威权主义者遇到反威权主义规范时
左翼威权主义(LWA)在心理学上有着争议的历史。一些研究人员对LWA的存在表示怀疑,而另一些人则认为LWA是一个有效的结构。在本文中,我们通过提出基于意识形态的专制规范有时与创造专制个体的过程相冲突,提供了一个框架来调和这两种观点。在西方政治背景下,威权主义规范更有可能出现在政治光谱的保守一方;但威权主义的特质可能出现在保守派和自由派身上。因此,在我们的模型中,左翼威权主义者经常占据影响威权主义的力量发生冲突的空间。我们回顾了与模型相关的现有证据,提出了与模型相关的新证据,从模型中得出了四个假设,并讨论了模型证伪的标准。最后,我们考虑了该模型在当前意识形态复杂性研究中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信