Optimizing Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Bladder Cancer Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-13 DOI:10.3233/blc-200428
Syed M Alam, Carrie Michel, Hilary Robertson, Juliana T Camargo, Brenda Linares, Jeffrey Holzbeierlein, Jill Hamilton-Reeves
{"title":"Optimizing Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Syed M Alam, Carrie Michel, Hilary Robertson, Juliana T Camargo, Brenda Linares, Jeffrey Holzbeierlein, Jill Hamilton-Reeves","doi":"10.3233/blc-200428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutrition is a modifiable risk factor for patients undergoing multimodal oncologic interventions and plays a major supportive role in the setting of bladder cancer. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), malnutrition is associated with increased postoperative complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review is to characterize the role of nutritional interventions for patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-database systematic scoping review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was performed. Search terms were developed <i>a priori</i> to identify clinical trials that focused on nutritional interventions for patients with bladder cancer undergoing RC. Eligible articles were original research articles or abstracts from clinical trials evaluating nutritional interventions in adult patients undergoing RC. Articles were excluded if they did not focus on a nutritional intervention, if patients did not carry a diagnosis of bladder cancer, or if RC was not performed. Articles were reviewed independently by the authors, and inclusion/exclusion were based on consensus agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 articles were identified, of which 17 were included in the final analysis. A total of 49 articles were excluded during abstract screening. An additional 17 articles were excluded based on the review of full-text articles. Results of the scoping review suggest that data on the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and intervention for patients undergoing RC are scarce. Although parenteral nutrition (PN) appears to be associated with greater complications after RC, early introduction of food postoperatively or feeding enterally offers benefit and immunonutrition supplements with a focus on a high protein diet has the potential to better optimize surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the prevalence and consequences of malnutrition among patients undergoing RC are well-established, there are limited data evaluating the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and interventions for this population. The pursuit of future clinical trials in this space is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"7 4","pages":"449-461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/a0/blc-7-blc200428.PMC8730471.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-200428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nutrition is a modifiable risk factor for patients undergoing multimodal oncologic interventions and plays a major supportive role in the setting of bladder cancer. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), malnutrition is associated with increased postoperative complications and mortality.

Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review is to characterize the role of nutritional interventions for patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.

Methods: A multi-database systematic scoping review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was performed. Search terms were developed a priori to identify clinical trials that focused on nutritional interventions for patients with bladder cancer undergoing RC. Eligible articles were original research articles or abstracts from clinical trials evaluating nutritional interventions in adult patients undergoing RC. Articles were excluded if they did not focus on a nutritional intervention, if patients did not carry a diagnosis of bladder cancer, or if RC was not performed. Articles were reviewed independently by the authors, and inclusion/exclusion were based on consensus agreement.

Results: A total of 83 articles were identified, of which 17 were included in the final analysis. A total of 49 articles were excluded during abstract screening. An additional 17 articles were excluded based on the review of full-text articles. Results of the scoping review suggest that data on the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and intervention for patients undergoing RC are scarce. Although parenteral nutrition (PN) appears to be associated with greater complications after RC, early introduction of food postoperatively or feeding enterally offers benefit and immunonutrition supplements with a focus on a high protein diet has the potential to better optimize surgical outcomes.

Conclusions: Although the prevalence and consequences of malnutrition among patients undergoing RC are well-established, there are limited data evaluating the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and interventions for this population. The pursuit of future clinical trials in this space is critical.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化根治性膀胱切除术患者的营养状况:系统性范围审查。
背景:营养是接受多模式肿瘤干预的患者的一个可改变的风险因素,在膀胱癌的治疗中起着重要的支持作用。对于接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的患者来说,营养不良与术后并发症和死亡率的增加有关:本综述旨在描述营养干预对膀胱癌根治术患者的作用:方法:根据《系统性综述首选报告项目扩展范围综述》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)指南进行多数据库系统性范围综述。事先制定了检索词,以确定针对接受康复治疗的膀胱癌患者进行营养干预的临床试验。符合条件的文章均为原始研究文章或临床试验摘要,这些临床试验对接受膀胱癌手术的成年患者的营养干预措施进行了评估。如果文章的重点不是营养干预,如果患者未确诊为膀胱癌,或者如果未进行 RC,则排除在外。文章由作者独立审阅,纳入/排除以达成一致意见为基础:共发现 83 篇文章,其中 17 篇被纳入最终分析。在摘要筛选过程中,共有 49 篇文章被排除在外。另有 17 篇文章在审查全文时被排除。范围界定审查的结果表明,有关对接受 RC 的患者进行营养筛查、评估和干预的数据很少。虽然肠外营养(PN)似乎与 RC 术后并发症的增加有关,但术后早期进食或肠内喂养可带来益处,而以高蛋白饮食为重点的免疫营养补充剂有可能更好地优化手术效果:尽管接受脊髓灰质炎手术的患者营养不良的发生率和后果已得到证实,但对这一人群进行营养筛查、评估和干预的评估数据却很有限。未来在这一领域开展临床试验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信