Plant-based diets and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in African Americans: A cohort study.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003863
Leah J Weston, Hyunju Kim, Sameera A Talegawkar, Katherine L Tucker, Adolfo Correa, Casey M Rebholz
{"title":"Plant-based diets and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in African Americans: A cohort study.","authors":"Leah J Weston,&nbsp;Hyunju Kim,&nbsp;Sameera A Talegawkar,&nbsp;Katherine L Tucker,&nbsp;Adolfo Correa,&nbsp;Casey M Rebholz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1003863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies have documented lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among people with a higher adherence to a plant-based dietary pattern. Non-Hispanic black Americans are an understudied group with high burden of CVD, yet studies of plant-based diets have been limited in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We conducted an analysis of prospectively collected data from a community-based cohort of African American adults (n = 3,635) in the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) aged 21-95 years, living in the Jackson, Mississippi, metropolitan area, US, who were followed from 2000 to 2018. Using self-reported dietary data, we assigned scores to participants' adherence to 3 plant-based dietary patterns: an overall plant-based diet index (PDI), a healthy PDI (hPDI), and an unhealthy PDI (uPDI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between plant-based diet scores and CVD incidence and all-cause mortality. Over a median follow-up of 13 and 15 years, there were 293 incident CVD cases and 597 deaths, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, and education) and health behaviors (smoking, alcohol intake, margarine intake, physical activity, and total energy intake), no significant association was observed between plant-based diets and incident CVD for overall PDI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.42, p-trend = 0.72), hPDI (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80-1.42, p-trend = 0.67), and uPDI (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.28, p-trend = 0.76). Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality risk with overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 0.96 (0.78-1.18), 0.94 (0.76-1.16), and 1.06 (0.86-1.30), respectively. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for incident coronary heart disease with overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 1.09 (0.74-1.61), 1.11 (0.76-1.61), and 0.79 (0.52-1.18), respectively. For incident total stroke, HRs (95% CIs) for overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 1.00 (0.66-1.52), 0.91 (0.61-1.36), and 1.26 (0.84-1.89) (p-trend for all tests > 0.05). Limitations of the study include use of self-reported dietary intake, residual confounding, potential for reverse causation, and that the study did not capture those who exclusively consume plant-derived foods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of black Americans, we observed that, unlike in prior studies, greater adherence to a plant-based diet was not associated with CVD or all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20368,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"e1003863"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730418/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003863","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have documented lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among people with a higher adherence to a plant-based dietary pattern. Non-Hispanic black Americans are an understudied group with high burden of CVD, yet studies of plant-based diets have been limited in this population.

Methods and findings: We conducted an analysis of prospectively collected data from a community-based cohort of African American adults (n = 3,635) in the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) aged 21-95 years, living in the Jackson, Mississippi, metropolitan area, US, who were followed from 2000 to 2018. Using self-reported dietary data, we assigned scores to participants' adherence to 3 plant-based dietary patterns: an overall plant-based diet index (PDI), a healthy PDI (hPDI), and an unhealthy PDI (uPDI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between plant-based diet scores and CVD incidence and all-cause mortality. Over a median follow-up of 13 and 15 years, there were 293 incident CVD cases and 597 deaths, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, and education) and health behaviors (smoking, alcohol intake, margarine intake, physical activity, and total energy intake), no significant association was observed between plant-based diets and incident CVD for overall PDI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.42, p-trend = 0.72), hPDI (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80-1.42, p-trend = 0.67), and uPDI (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.28, p-trend = 0.76). Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality risk with overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 0.96 (0.78-1.18), 0.94 (0.76-1.16), and 1.06 (0.86-1.30), respectively. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for incident coronary heart disease with overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 1.09 (0.74-1.61), 1.11 (0.76-1.61), and 0.79 (0.52-1.18), respectively. For incident total stroke, HRs (95% CIs) for overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI were 1.00 (0.66-1.52), 0.91 (0.61-1.36), and 1.26 (0.84-1.89) (p-trend for all tests > 0.05). Limitations of the study include use of self-reported dietary intake, residual confounding, potential for reverse causation, and that the study did not capture those who exclusively consume plant-derived foods.

Conclusions: In this study of black Americans, we observed that, unlike in prior studies, greater adherence to a plant-based diet was not associated with CVD or all-cause mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非裔美国人植物性饮食与心血管疾病发病率和全因死亡率:一项队列研究
背景:先前的研究表明,在坚持植物性饮食模式的人群中,心血管疾病(CVD)的风险较低。非西班牙裔美国黑人是一个未被充分研究的CVD高负担群体,然而植物性饮食的研究在这一人群中有限。方法和发现:我们对杰克逊心脏研究(JHS)中年龄21-95岁的非裔美国成年人(n = 3,635)的前瞻性数据进行了分析,这些成年人居住在美国密西西比州杰克逊大都会区,从2000年到2018年进行了随访。使用自我报告的饮食数据,我们对参与者坚持三种植物性饮食模式进行了评分:总体植物性饮食指数(PDI),健康PDI (hPDI)和不健康PDI (uPDI)。Cox比例风险模型用于估计植物性饮食评分与心血管疾病发病率和全因死亡率之间的关系。在13年和15年的中位随访中,分别有293例心血管疾病病例和597例死亡。在调整了社会人口统计学特征(年龄、性别和受教育程度)和健康行为(吸烟、饮酒、人造黄油摄入、体力活动和总能量摄入)后,在总体PDI(风险比[HR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.42, p-trend = 0.72)、hPDI(风险比[HR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.80-1.42, p-trend = 0.67)和uPDI(风险比[HR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.28, p-trend = 0.76)方面,植物性饮食与CVD发生率之间没有显著关联。与总PDI、hPDI和uPDI相关的全因死亡风险hr (95% ci)分别为0.96(0.78-1.18)、0.94(0.76-1.16)和1.06(0.86-1.30)。冠心病发生率与总PDI、hPDI和uPDI的相应hr (95% ci)分别为1.09(0.74-1.61)、1.11(0.76-1.61)和0.79(0.52-1.18)。对于事件总卒中,总PDI、hPDI和uPDI的hr (95% ci)分别为1.00(0.66-1.52)、0.91(0.61-1.36)和1.26 (0.84-1.89)(p趋势均> 0.05)。该研究的局限性包括使用自我报告的饮食摄入量,残留混淆,反向因果关系的可能性,以及该研究没有捕获那些只食用植物性食物的人。结论:在这项针对美国黑人的研究中,我们观察到,与之前的研究不同,坚持植物性饮食与心血管疾病或全因死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine aims to be a leading platform for research and analysis on the global health challenges faced by humanity. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedicine, the environment, society, and politics, that affect the well-being of individuals worldwide. It particularly highlights studies that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or our understanding of disease mechanisms, with the ultimate goal of improving health outcomes in diverse settings. Unwavering in its commitment to ethical standards, PLOS Medicine ensures integrity in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and transparently disclosing any conflicts of interest during the reporting, peer review, and publication processes. The journal promotes transparency by providing visibility into the review and publication procedures. It also encourages data sharing and the reuse of published work. Author rights are upheld, allowing them to retain copyright. Furthermore, PLOS Medicine strongly supports Open Access publishing, making research articles freely available to all without restrictions, facilitating widespread dissemination of knowledge. The journal does not endorse drug or medical device advertising and refrains from exclusive sales of reprints to avoid conflicts of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信