Efficacy and safety of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-course radiation therapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II clinical trial with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-26 DOI:10.3857/roj.2021.00654
Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Akbar Hafezi, NamPhong Nguyen, Shapour Omidvari, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Mansour Ansari, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-course radiation therapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II clinical trial with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients.","authors":"Alimohammad Bananzadeh,&nbsp;Ali Akbar Hafezi,&nbsp;NamPhong Nguyen,&nbsp;Shapour Omidvari,&nbsp;Ahmad Mosalaei,&nbsp;Niloofar Ahmadloo,&nbsp;Mansour Ansari,&nbsp;Mohammad Mohammadianpanah","doi":"10.3857/roj.2021.00654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advancer rectal cancer with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-arm phase II clinical trial, eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-4 and/or N1-2) were enrolled. All the patients received a median three sequential cycles of neoadjuvant CAPEOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. A total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions during 1 week was prescribed to the gross tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surgery was performed about 8 weeks following radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and grade 3-4 toxicity were compared between older patients (≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. There were 32 older patients and 64 younger patients. Overall pCR was 20.8% for all the patients. Older patients achieved similar pCR rate (18.7% vs. 21.8; p = 0.795) compared to younger patients. There was no statistically significance in terms of the tumor and the node downstaging or treatment-related toxicity between older patients and younger ones; however, the rate of sphincter-saving surgery was significantly more frequent in younger patients (73% vs. 53%; p=0.047) compared to older ones. All treatment-related toxicities were manageable and tolerable among older patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant SCRT and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery was safe and effective in older patients compared to young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":"39 4","pages":"270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/2e/roj-2021-00654.PMC8743455.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advancer rectal cancer with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients.

Materials and methods: In this single-arm phase II clinical trial, eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-4 and/or N1-2) were enrolled. All the patients received a median three sequential cycles of neoadjuvant CAPEOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. A total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions during 1 week was prescribed to the gross tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surgery was performed about 8 weeks following radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and grade 3-4 toxicity were compared between older patients (≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years).

Results: Ninety-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. There were 32 older patients and 64 younger patients. Overall pCR was 20.8% for all the patients. Older patients achieved similar pCR rate (18.7% vs. 21.8; p = 0.795) compared to younger patients. There was no statistically significance in terms of the tumor and the node downstaging or treatment-related toxicity between older patients and younger ones; however, the rate of sphincter-saving surgery was significantly more frequent in younger patients (73% vs. 53%; p=0.047) compared to older ones. All treatment-related toxicities were manageable and tolerable among older patients.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant SCRT and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery was safe and effective in older patients compared to young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

顺序新辅助化疗和短期放疗后延迟手术治疗局部晚期直肠癌的疗效和安全性:一项单臂II期临床试验,老年和年轻患者的亚组分析
目的:本研究通过对老年和年轻直肠癌患者的亚组分析,探讨短期放射治疗(SCRT)和序贯化疗后延迟手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:在这项单臂II期临床试验中,纳入了符合条件的局部晚期直肠癌(T3-4和/或N1-2)患者。所有患者均接受新辅助CAPEOX(卡培他滨+奥沙利铂)化疗的中位连续3个周期。总剂量为25 Gy,分5次,在1周内给予肿瘤和局部淋巴结。放疗后约8周行手术。比较老年患者(≥65岁)和年轻患者的病理完全缓解率(pCR)和3-4级毒性(结果:96例局部晚期直肠癌患者入组)。老年患者32例,年轻患者64例。所有患者的总pCR为20.8%。老年患者的pCR率相似(18.7% vs. 21.8;P = 0.795)。老年患者与年轻患者在肿瘤和淋巴结降期或治疗相关毒性方面无统计学意义;然而,保留括约肌的手术率在年轻患者中明显更频繁(73%对53%;P =0.047)。所有治疗相关的毒性在老年患者中都是可控和可耐受的。结论:与年轻的局部晚期直肠癌患者相比,老年患者新辅助SCRT和序贯化疗后延迟手术是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信