Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcomes and their Determinants.

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jeewan Rankothkumbura, Hemantha Gunathilaka, Saman Wadanamby
{"title":"Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcomes and their Determinants.","authors":"Jeewan Rankothkumbura,&nbsp;Hemantha Gunathilaka,&nbsp;Saman Wadanamby","doi":"10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a management option to control raised Intracranial pressure (ICP) in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with inconsistent evidence for its outcomes and their determinants.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes and determinants of outcomes of DC done in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL) at one year and three years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent DC for TBI within 6 months period from 01/02/2016 to 31/07/2016 at Neurotrauma Centre, NHSL were included in the study. Data were retrieved from medical records. Outcomes were evaluated by interviewing patients/relatives over the telephone using standard questionnaire for extended Glasgow Outcome scale (GOS-E).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion and exclusion criteria matched 118 patients were selected and 89 (75.42%) contactable patients were included in the analysis. Majority (86.4%) were males and median age was 45 years. There were 56 primary DCs and 33 secondary DCs. Favorable outcomes (GOS-E 5-8) were seen in 20.2% and in 24.7% at the end of one year and three years respectively. Younger age, good pupillary reaction and higher GCS on admission were associated with statistically significant favorable outcomes (P<0.05). Pupillary symmetry, timing of DC (primary or secondary), time elapsed from time of injury to performing primary DC, type of DC, whether CT shows an isolated lesion or multiple lesions, submission to tracheostomy, having medical comorbidities and post-operative infections were not predictive of the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Favorable functional outcomes following DC for TBI is limited to 20-25%. Younger age, good pupillary reaction and higher GCS are predictors of favorable functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9777,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a management option to control raised Intracranial pressure (ICP) in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with inconsistent evidence for its outcomes and their determinants.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes and determinants of outcomes of DC done in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL) at one year and three years of follow-up.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent DC for TBI within 6 months period from 01/02/2016 to 31/07/2016 at Neurotrauma Centre, NHSL were included in the study. Data were retrieved from medical records. Outcomes were evaluated by interviewing patients/relatives over the telephone using standard questionnaire for extended Glasgow Outcome scale (GOS-E).

Results: Inclusion and exclusion criteria matched 118 patients were selected and 89 (75.42%) contactable patients were included in the analysis. Majority (86.4%) were males and median age was 45 years. There were 56 primary DCs and 33 secondary DCs. Favorable outcomes (GOS-E 5-8) were seen in 20.2% and in 24.7% at the end of one year and three years respectively. Younger age, good pupillary reaction and higher GCS on admission were associated with statistically significant favorable outcomes (P<0.05). Pupillary symmetry, timing of DC (primary or secondary), time elapsed from time of injury to performing primary DC, type of DC, whether CT shows an isolated lesion or multiple lesions, submission to tracheostomy, having medical comorbidities and post-operative infections were not predictive of the outcome.

Conclusion: Favorable functional outcomes following DC for TBI is limited to 20-25%. Younger age, good pupillary reaction and higher GCS are predictors of favorable functional outcomes.

颅脑外伤减压切除术:结果及其决定因素。
背景:减压颅骨切除术(DC)是一种控制外伤性脑损伤(TBI)颅内压升高的治疗选择,其结果及其决定因素的证据不一致。目的:本研究的目的是评估在斯里兰卡国家医院(NHSL)进行的一年和三年随访的DC的结果和决定因素。材料与方法:选取2016年2月1日至2016年7月31日在NHSL神经创伤中心接受DC治疗TBI的患者为研究对象。数据从医疗记录中检索。通过电话采访患者/亲属,使用扩展格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS-E)的标准问卷来评估结果。结果:入选和排除标准匹配的患者118例,纳入接触患者89例(75.42%)。大多数(86.4%)为男性,中位年龄为45岁。主dc 56例,次dc 33例。1年后和3年后的良好预后(GOS-E 5-8)分别为20.2%和24.7%。年龄较小、瞳孔反应良好和入院时GCS较高与统计学上显著的良好预后相关(结论:TBI DC术后良好的功能预后限制在20-25%。较年轻、良好的瞳孔反应和较高的GCS是良好的功能预后的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceylon Medical Journal
Ceylon Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Ceylon Medical Journal, is the oldest surviving medical journal in Australasia. It is the only medical journal in Sri Lanka that is listed in the Index Medicus. The CMJ started life way back in 1887 as the organ of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association. Except for a brief period between 1893 and 1904 when it ceased publication, the CMJ or its forbear, the Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association, has been published without interruption up to now. The journal"s name changed to the CMJ in 1954.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信