Documentation of the patient's smoking status in common chronic diseases - analysis of medical narrative reports using the ULMFiT based text classification.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-23 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2021.2004664
Eveliina Hirvonen, Antti Karlsson, Tarja Saaresranta, Tarja Laitinen
{"title":"Documentation of the patient's smoking status in common chronic diseases - analysis of medical narrative reports using the ULMFiT based text classification.","authors":"Eveliina Hirvonen,&nbsp;Antti Karlsson,&nbsp;Tarja Saaresranta,&nbsp;Tarja Laitinen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2021.2004664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking cessation is essential part of a successful treatment in many chronic diseases. Our aim was to analyse how actively clinicians discuss and document patients' smoking status into electronic health records (EHR) and deliver smoking cessation assistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed the results using a combination of rule and deep learning-based algorithms. Narrative reports of all adult patients, whose treatment started between years 2010 and 2016 for one of seven common chronic diseases, were followed for two years. Smoking related sentences were first extracted with a rule-based algorithm. Subsequently, pre-trained ULMFiT-based algorithm classified each patient's smoking status as a current smoker, ex-smoker, or never smoker. A rule-based algorithm was then again used to analyse the physician-patient discussions on smoking cessation among current smokers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35,650 patients were studied. Of all patients, 60% were found to have a smoking status in EHR and the documentation improved over time. Smoking status was documented more actively among COPD (86%) and sleep apnoea (83%) patients compared to patients with asthma, type 1&2 diabetes, cerebral infarction and ischemic heart disease (range 44-61%). Of the current smokers (N=7,105), 49% had discussed smoking cessation with their physician. The performance of ULMFiT-based classifier was good with F-scores 79-92.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ee found that smoking status was documented in 60% of patients with chronic disease and that the clinician had discussed smoking cessation in 49% of patients who were current smokers. ULMFiT-based classifier showed good/excellent performance and allowed us to efficiently study a large number of patients' medical narratives.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/48/ZECR_8_2004664.PMC8635564.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2021.2004664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation is essential part of a successful treatment in many chronic diseases. Our aim was to analyse how actively clinicians discuss and document patients' smoking status into electronic health records (EHR) and deliver smoking cessation assistance.

Methods: We analysed the results using a combination of rule and deep learning-based algorithms. Narrative reports of all adult patients, whose treatment started between years 2010 and 2016 for one of seven common chronic diseases, were followed for two years. Smoking related sentences were first extracted with a rule-based algorithm. Subsequently, pre-trained ULMFiT-based algorithm classified each patient's smoking status as a current smoker, ex-smoker, or never smoker. A rule-based algorithm was then again used to analyse the physician-patient discussions on smoking cessation among current smokers.

Results: A total of 35,650 patients were studied. Of all patients, 60% were found to have a smoking status in EHR and the documentation improved over time. Smoking status was documented more actively among COPD (86%) and sleep apnoea (83%) patients compared to patients with asthma, type 1&2 diabetes, cerebral infarction and ischemic heart disease (range 44-61%). Of the current smokers (N=7,105), 49% had discussed smoking cessation with their physician. The performance of ULMFiT-based classifier was good with F-scores 79-92.

Conclusion: Ee found that smoking status was documented in 60% of patients with chronic disease and that the clinician had discussed smoking cessation in 49% of patients who were current smokers. ULMFiT-based classifier showed good/excellent performance and allowed us to efficiently study a large number of patients' medical narratives.

记录常见慢性病患者的吸烟状况——使用基于ULMFiT的文本分类分析医学叙事报告。
引言:戒烟是许多慢性病成功治疗的重要组成部分。我们的目的是分析临床医生如何积极讨论患者的吸烟状况并将其记录在电子健康记录(EHR)中,并提供戒烟帮助。方法:我们使用基于规则和深度学习的算法相结合的方法来分析结果。对2010年至2016年间开始治疗七种常见慢性病之一的所有成年患者的叙述性报告进行了两年的随访。与吸烟有关的句子首先是用基于规则的算法提取的。随后,预先训练的基于ULMFiT的算法将每个患者的吸烟状态分类为当前吸烟者、前吸烟者或从未吸烟者。然后再次使用基于规则的算法来分析当前吸烟者中关于戒烟的医患讨论。结果:共对35650例患者进行了研究。在所有患者中,60%的患者在EHR中有吸烟状态,并且随着时间的推移,记录有所改善。与哮喘、1型和2型糖尿病、脑梗死和缺血性心脏病患者(范围44-61%)相比,COPD(86%)和睡眠呼吸暂停(83%)患者的吸烟状况更为活跃。在目前的吸烟者(N=7105)中,49%的人曾与医生讨论过戒烟问题。基于ULMFiT的分类器的性能良好,F评分为79-92。结论:Ee发现60%的慢性病患者记录了吸烟状态,49%的当前吸烟者曾讨论过戒烟问题。基于ULMFiT的分类器表现出良好/卓越的性能,使我们能够有效地研究大量患者的医疗叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信