Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1111/pace.14462
Marco Valerio Mariani, Agostino Piro, Michele Magnocavallo, Cristina Chimenti, Domenico Della Rocca, Pasquale Santangeli, Andrea Natale, Francesco Fedele, Carlo Lavalle
{"title":"Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review.","authors":"Marco Valerio Mariani,&nbsp;Agostino Piro,&nbsp;Michele Magnocavallo,&nbsp;Cristina Chimenti,&nbsp;Domenico Della Rocca,&nbsp;Pasquale Santangeli,&nbsp;Andrea Natale,&nbsp;Francesco Fedele,&nbsp;Carlo Lavalle","doi":"10.1111/pace.14462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM-VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long-term procedural outcomes are not well established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the available data in the literature assessing efficacy and safety of PM-VAs catheter ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search of PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to March 1, 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Twenty-one observational noncontrolled case-series were considered eligible for the systematic review, including 536 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postero-medial PM harbored 60.8% of PM-VAs, while antero-lateral PM and right ventricular PMs 34.9% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The mean acute success rate of the index ablation procedure was 88.1% (95% CI 82.8% to 91.9%, p < .001, I<sup>2</sup> 0%). After a mean follow-up period of 15.5 ± 17.4 months, pooled long-term arrhythmia-free rate was 69.2%, while the pooled long-term success rate after multiple ablation procedure was 84.9%. Overall, procedure complications occurred in nine patients (1.7%) and no procedure-related deaths were reported. The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as well as contact force sensing (CFS) and irrigated catheters during ablation was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PM-VAs, with an acute success rate of 88.1%, a long-term success rate of 69.2%, with a relatively low procedural complication rate. The use of ICE, irrigated catheters and catheters with CFS capability was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"519-531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/22/PACE-45-519.PMC9302647.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM-VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long-term procedural outcomes are not well established.

Objective: To systematically review the available data in the literature assessing efficacy and safety of PM-VAs catheter ablation.

Methods: An online search of PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to March 1, 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Twenty-one observational noncontrolled case-series were considered eligible for the systematic review, including 536 patients.

Results: Postero-medial PM harbored 60.8% of PM-VAs, while antero-lateral PM and right ventricular PMs 34.9% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The mean acute success rate of the index ablation procedure was 88.1% (95% CI 82.8% to 91.9%, p < .001, I2 0%). After a mean follow-up period of 15.5 ± 17.4 months, pooled long-term arrhythmia-free rate was 69.2%, while the pooled long-term success rate after multiple ablation procedure was 84.9%. Overall, procedure complications occurred in nine patients (1.7%) and no procedure-related deaths were reported. The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as well as contact force sensing (CFS) and irrigated catheters during ablation was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Catheter ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PM-VAs, with an acute success rate of 88.1%, a long-term success rate of 69.2%, with a relatively low procedural complication rate. The use of ICE, irrigated catheters and catheters with CFS capability was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

导管消融治疗乳头状肌性心律失常:系统综述。
背景:导管消融治疗乳头状肌室性心律失常(PM-VAs)的效果并不理想。可能影响急性和长期手术结果的特征尚未得到很好的确定。目的:系统回顾评价PM-VAs导管消融疗效和安全性的文献资料。方法:除了人工筛选外,还在线检索PubMed、Cochrane Registry、Web of Science、Scopus和EMBASE库(从成立到2021年3月1日)。21例观察性非对照病例系列纳入系统评价,包括536例患者。结果:PM后内侧区占60.8%,前外侧区占34.9%,右室区占4.3%。指数消融手术的平均急性成功率为88.1% (95% CI为82.8%至91.9%,p为2%)。平均随访15.5±17.4个月,合并长期无心律失常率为69.2%,合并多次消融术后长期成功率为84.9%。总体而言,9例患者(1.7%)发生手术并发症,无手术相关死亡报告。在长期随访中,心内超声心动图(ICE)以及接触力传感(CFS)和冲洗导管的使用与较高的心律失常无发生率相关。结论:导管消融治疗PM-VAs是一种安全有效的治疗策略,急性成功率为88.1%,长期成功率为69.2%,手术并发症发生率较低。在长期随访中,使用ICE、冲洗导管和具有CFS功能的导管与较高的心律失常无发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信