From Office-Based Treatment to Telehealth: Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Patient Participation in a Psychiatric Intensive Outpatient Program with a Large Transdiagnostic Sample.

Jessica M Gannon, Jaspreet S Brar, Susanna Zawacki, Tiffany Painter, Kelly O'Toole, K N Roy Chengappa
{"title":"From Office-Based Treatment to Telehealth: Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Patient Participation in a Psychiatric Intensive Outpatient Program with a Large Transdiagnostic Sample.","authors":"Jessica M Gannon,&nbsp;Jaspreet S Brar,&nbsp;Susanna Zawacki,&nbsp;Tiffany Painter,&nbsp;Kelly O'Toole,&nbsp;K N Roy Chengappa","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Patient participation and clinical outcomes of a precoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) office-based transdiagnostic psychiatric intensive outpatient program (IOP) were compared with those of telehealth IOP during COVID-19. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Weeks of enrollment, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) assessments, and sociodemographic and clinical factors (including group track and diagnosis) were collected during pre-COVID-19 (n = 191) and during COVID-19 (<i>n</i> = 200). Continuous and categorical measures of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 were analyzed; potential sociodemographic and clinical covariates to scores were also explored. <b>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant differences in participation between time periods. Associations were observed between PHQ-9/GAD-7 score improvement and number of assessments. Significant score reductions occurred in both periods, and differences in change scores were not significant. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were not significantly different between time periods. Patients with commercial insurance had significantly higher improvement in both mean and categorical PHQ-9 scores (<i>t</i> = 2.77, <i>p</i> = 0.006; χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.47, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and GAD-7 scores (<i>t</i> = 2.29, <i>p</i> = 0.023; χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.58, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than those with public insurance. Patients with anxiety disorders had significantly greater improvements (<i>F</i> = 4.49, <i>p</i> = 0.004; χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.15, df = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.027) in GAD-7 during COVID-19. <b>Discussion:</b> Significant improvements in PHQ-9/GAD-7 scores and measures of participation were not significantly different between telehealth and office-based IOP, nor were they greatly influenced by clinical or sociodemographic factors. Further study is needed of possible care disparities for publicly insured patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite some limitations, telehealth IOP appears to be a clinically appropriate option for a diverse sociodemographic and diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1126-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Patient participation and clinical outcomes of a precoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) office-based transdiagnostic psychiatric intensive outpatient program (IOP) were compared with those of telehealth IOP during COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Weeks of enrollment, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) assessments, and sociodemographic and clinical factors (including group track and diagnosis) were collected during pre-COVID-19 (n = 191) and during COVID-19 (n = 200). Continuous and categorical measures of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 were analyzed; potential sociodemographic and clinical covariates to scores were also explored. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in participation between time periods. Associations were observed between PHQ-9/GAD-7 score improvement and number of assessments. Significant score reductions occurred in both periods, and differences in change scores were not significant. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were not significantly different between time periods. Patients with commercial insurance had significantly higher improvement in both mean and categorical PHQ-9 scores (t = 2.77, p = 0.006; χ2 = 10.47, df = 1, p = 0.001) and GAD-7 scores (t = 2.29, p = 0.023; χ2 = 8.58, df = 1, p = 0.003) than those with public insurance. Patients with anxiety disorders had significantly greater improvements (F = 4.49, p = 0.004; χ2 = 9.15, df = 3, p = 0.027) in GAD-7 during COVID-19. Discussion: Significant improvements in PHQ-9/GAD-7 scores and measures of participation were not significantly different between telehealth and office-based IOP, nor were they greatly influenced by clinical or sociodemographic factors. Further study is needed of possible care disparities for publicly insured patients. Conclusion: Despite some limitations, telehealth IOP appears to be a clinically appropriate option for a diverse sociodemographic and diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric population.

从以办公室为基础的治疗到远程医疗:比较临床结果和患者参与精神病学密集门诊项目与大型跨诊断样本。
前言:将2019冠状病毒前期疾病(COVID-19)基于办公室的跨诊断精神科强化门诊项目(IOP)与远程医疗IOP的患者参与情况和临床结果进行比较。材料与方法:入组数周,收集患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)评估,以及在COVID-19前(n = 191)和COVID-19期间(n = 200)的社会人口学和临床因素(包括小组跟踪和诊断)。分析GAD-7和PHQ-9的连续和分类测量值;潜在的社会人口统计学和临床协变量的得分也进行了探讨。结果:不同时间段的参与情况无统计学差异。观察PHQ-9/GAD-7评分改善与评估次数之间的关联。两个时期的得分都有显著下降,变化得分的差异不显著。不同时期的社会人口学和临床因素无显著差异。商业保险患者的PHQ-9平均评分和分类评分均有显著提高(t = 2.77, p = 0.006;χ2 = 10.47,df = 1, p = 0.001)和GAD-7分数(t = 2.29, p = 0.023;χ2 = 8.58, df = 1, p = 0.003)。焦虑障碍患者的改善明显更大(F = 4.49, p = 0.004;χ2 = 9.15,df = 3,在COVID-19 GAD-7 p = 0.027)。讨论:PHQ-9/GAD-7评分和参与程度的显著改善在远程医疗和基于办公室的IOP之间没有显著差异,也没有受到临床或社会人口因素的很大影响。需要进一步研究公共参保患者可能存在的护理差异。结论:尽管有一些限制,远程医疗IOP似乎是一个临床适当的选择,不同的社会人口和诊断异质精神病人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信