Associations of centralization with health care quality for gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy in China.

Jiafu Ji, Leiyu Shi, Xiangji Ying, Xinpu Lu, Fei Shan, Haibo Wang
{"title":"Associations of centralization with health care quality for gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy in China.","authors":"Jiafu Ji,&nbsp;Leiyu Shi,&nbsp;Xiangji Ying,&nbsp;Xinpu Lu,&nbsp;Fei Shan,&nbsp;Haibo Wang","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited evidence is available regarding the associations of centralization with gastric cancer patients' quality of care in high surgical volume settings. The current study aimed to explore the effects of hospital volume and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) on in-hospital mortality, total cost, and length of stay for Chinese gastrectomy patients in a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data on gastrectomy for gastric cancer from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System Database between 2013 and 2018. Hospital volume was divided into 4 quartiles: low (1-83 cases per year), medium (84-238 cases), high (239-579 cases), and very high (580-1,193 cases). The HHI was divided into 3 categories: highly concentrated (>2,500), moderately concentrated (1,500-2,500), and unconcentrated (<1,500). We used mixed-effects models to analyze the data while accounting for data clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 125,683 patients in 515 institutions. In the multivariable analyses, hospital volume was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [medium <i>vs.</i> low: odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.43-0.84, P=0.003; high: OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.87, P=0.009; and very high: OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.18-0.61, P<0.001) and length of stay (high<i>vs</i>. low: β=-0.036, 95% CI=-0.071--0.002, P=0.039) but not with total cost. Hospitals located in unconcentrated provinces had higher in-hospital mortality (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.26, P=0.036) and longer lengths of stay (β=0.024, 95% CI=0.001-0.047, P=0.041) than hospitals located in highly concentrated provinces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Centralization of gastrectomy, measured by hospital volume and the HHI, was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and shortened length of stay without increasing total cost. These results support the strategy of centralizing gastrectomy in high-volume settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9830,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","volume":"33 6","pages":"659-670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/3a/cjcr-33-6-659.PMC8742175.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Limited evidence is available regarding the associations of centralization with gastric cancer patients' quality of care in high surgical volume settings. The current study aimed to explore the effects of hospital volume and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) on in-hospital mortality, total cost, and length of stay for Chinese gastrectomy patients in a nationwide database.

Methods: We extracted data on gastrectomy for gastric cancer from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System Database between 2013 and 2018. Hospital volume was divided into 4 quartiles: low (1-83 cases per year), medium (84-238 cases), high (239-579 cases), and very high (580-1,193 cases). The HHI was divided into 3 categories: highly concentrated (>2,500), moderately concentrated (1,500-2,500), and unconcentrated (<1,500). We used mixed-effects models to analyze the data while accounting for data clustering.

Results: We analyzed 125,683 patients in 515 institutions. In the multivariable analyses, hospital volume was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [medium vs. low: odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.43-0.84, P=0.003; high: OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.87, P=0.009; and very high: OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.18-0.61, P<0.001) and length of stay (highvs. low: β=-0.036, 95% CI=-0.071--0.002, P=0.039) but not with total cost. Hospitals located in unconcentrated provinces had higher in-hospital mortality (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.26, P=0.036) and longer lengths of stay (β=0.024, 95% CI=0.001-0.047, P=0.041) than hospitals located in highly concentrated provinces.

Conclusions: Centralization of gastrectomy, measured by hospital volume and the HHI, was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and shortened length of stay without increasing total cost. These results support the strategy of centralizing gastrectomy in high-volume settings.

Abstract Image

中国胃癌切除术患者集中与医疗保健质量的关系
目的:在高手术量环境下,关于集中治疗与胃癌患者护理质量的关系的证据有限。本研究旨在探讨医院容量和赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI)对中国胃切除术患者住院死亡率、总成本和住院时间的影响。方法:从2013 - 2018年医院质量监测系统数据库中提取胃癌切除术数据。医院容量分为4个四分位数:低(每年1-83例)、中(84-238例)、高(239-579例)和高(580- 1193例)。HHI分为3类:高度集中(> 2500)、中度集中(1500 - 2500)和非集中(结果:我们分析了515家机构的125683例患者。在多变量分析中,医院容量与院内死亡率显著相关[中、低:优势比(OR)=0.61, 95%可信区间(95% CI)=0.43-0.84, P=0.003;高:OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.87, P=0.009;非常高:OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.18-0.61, pv。低:β=-0.036, 95% CI=-0.071- 0.002, P=0.039),但与总成本无关。非集中省份医院的住院死亡率(OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.26, P=0.036)和住院时间(β=0.024, 95% CI=0.001-0.047, P=0.041)高于高度集中省份的医院。结论:通过医院容量和HHI测量胃切除术的中心化与住院死亡率降低和住院时间缩短有关,而不增加总费用。这些结果支持在大容量环境下集中胃切除术的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信