Do Black lives matter to clinical neuropsychologists? An introduction to a special issue.

The Clinical neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-28 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2021.2020906
Steven Paul Woods, Marc A Norman
{"title":"Do Black lives matter to clinical neuropsychologists? An introduction to a special issue.","authors":"Steven Paul Woods,&nbsp;Marc A Norman","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2021.2020906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The racial strife that was exacerbated by the murder of George Floyd in the Spring of 2020 prompted many of us to reflect on race as a social justice issue in clinical neuropsychology. As a specialty in which White Americans have historically been over-represented (Sweet et al., 2021), how much do Black lives really matter to clinical neuropsychology? Of course, the broader Civil Rights movement has been active for decades and the racial inequities in psychological science, training, and practice have existed for even longer (Guthrie, 2004). Importantly, they are inextricably linked and relevant to clinical neuropsychology. Black Americans experience marked health disparities and are over-represented in many of the clinical populations that neuropsychologists serve (e.g. vascular disease, dementia, and infectious disease). And yet, fewer than 1% (n = 75) of the nearly 11,000 articles published in our field’s six major journals since 1985 focus specifically on Black Americans. As seen in Figure 1, the limited emphasis on Black Americans in our neuropsychological research has not improved meaningfully in 35 years, as publication frequencies fall reliably below studies focused on other sociodemographic factors such as age, sex/gender, and education/literacy (ps < .0001). A majority of the neuropsychological articles on Black Americans emphasize race-based test score discrepancies, psychometrics, and norms (e.g. Heverly et al., 1986). Although such psychometric studies have value, they are nevertheless fraught with thorny interpretive issues (e.g. Manly & Echemendia, 2007; Possin et al., 2021) and represent only a small part of the brain health needs of Black Americans. Moreover, race is a social, rather than biological, construct, and the issues associated with race and brain health are tremendously complex and cannot be resolved with an exclusive psychometric focus. Inspired by the Black Lives Matter academic strike (Nature, 2020), this special issue was a call to action for clinical neuropsychologists to use their platform as clinician-scientists to promote the brain health and quality of life of Black Americans. The special issue begins with two systematic reviews examining the representation of Black Americans in neuropsychological studies. Historically, well over half of articles in clinical neuropsychology journals fail to include even basic descriptive data on","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"209-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.2020906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The racial strife that was exacerbated by the murder of George Floyd in the Spring of 2020 prompted many of us to reflect on race as a social justice issue in clinical neuropsychology. As a specialty in which White Americans have historically been over-represented (Sweet et al., 2021), how much do Black lives really matter to clinical neuropsychology? Of course, the broader Civil Rights movement has been active for decades and the racial inequities in psychological science, training, and practice have existed for even longer (Guthrie, 2004). Importantly, they are inextricably linked and relevant to clinical neuropsychology. Black Americans experience marked health disparities and are over-represented in many of the clinical populations that neuropsychologists serve (e.g. vascular disease, dementia, and infectious disease). And yet, fewer than 1% (n = 75) of the nearly 11,000 articles published in our field’s six major journals since 1985 focus specifically on Black Americans. As seen in Figure 1, the limited emphasis on Black Americans in our neuropsychological research has not improved meaningfully in 35 years, as publication frequencies fall reliably below studies focused on other sociodemographic factors such as age, sex/gender, and education/literacy (ps < .0001). A majority of the neuropsychological articles on Black Americans emphasize race-based test score discrepancies, psychometrics, and norms (e.g. Heverly et al., 1986). Although such psychometric studies have value, they are nevertheless fraught with thorny interpretive issues (e.g. Manly & Echemendia, 2007; Possin et al., 2021) and represent only a small part of the brain health needs of Black Americans. Moreover, race is a social, rather than biological, construct, and the issues associated with race and brain health are tremendously complex and cannot be resolved with an exclusive psychometric focus. Inspired by the Black Lives Matter academic strike (Nature, 2020), this special issue was a call to action for clinical neuropsychologists to use their platform as clinician-scientists to promote the brain health and quality of life of Black Americans. The special issue begins with two systematic reviews examining the representation of Black Americans in neuropsychological studies. Historically, well over half of articles in clinical neuropsychology journals fail to include even basic descriptive data on
黑人的生命对临床神经心理学家重要吗?特刊的介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书