Real-world HIV diagnostic testing patterns in the United States.

Chakkarin Burudpakdee, Aimee M Near, Jenny Tse, Jillian Faccone, Pedro L Rodriguez, James K Karichu, Mindy M Cheng
{"title":"Real-world HIV diagnostic testing patterns in the United States.","authors":"Chakkarin Burudpakdee,&nbsp;Aimee M Near,&nbsp;Jenny Tse,&nbsp;Jillian Faccone,&nbsp;Pedro L Rodriguez,&nbsp;James K Karichu,&nbsp;Mindy M Cheng","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2022.88826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand real-world implementation of the updated CDC HIV diagnostic testing algorithm.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective database analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Quest Diagnostics, we identified patients with at least 1 HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation test (BioRad Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay [Geenius]) between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Study measures included Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant patient demographics, test results, test frequency, and sequence relative to the CDC HIV diagnostic algorithm, including HIV-1 RNA Qualitative Assay (Aptima) or HIV-2 nucleic acid test (NAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26,319 patients were identified (mean [SD] age, 40.7 [14.3] years; 66.4% male), with 28,954 Geenius tests, 7234 Aptima tests, and 298 HIV-2 NATs. In 26.4% of test sequences, the Geenius results were indeterminate or negative and required subsequent confirmatory NATs. A total of 8.5% of patients had more than 1 Geenius test in 2017, and 11.2% of the time, results of the first and second tests differed. A total of 74.2% of test sequences matched the CDC-recommended algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study findings suggest that the CDC HIV diagnostic algorithm is complex and may pose suboptimal testing efficiency. Opportunities to improve diagnostic efficiency by reducing indeterminate results and repeat tests are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":267832,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of managed care","volume":" ","pages":"e42-e48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of managed care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2022.88826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand real-world implementation of the updated CDC HIV diagnostic testing algorithm.

Study design: Retrospective database analysis.

Methods: Using data from Quest Diagnostics, we identified patients with at least 1 HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation test (BioRad Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay [Geenius]) between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Study measures included Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant patient demographics, test results, test frequency, and sequence relative to the CDC HIV diagnostic algorithm, including HIV-1 RNA Qualitative Assay (Aptima) or HIV-2 nucleic acid test (NAT).

Results: A total of 26,319 patients were identified (mean [SD] age, 40.7 [14.3] years; 66.4% male), with 28,954 Geenius tests, 7234 Aptima tests, and 298 HIV-2 NATs. In 26.4% of test sequences, the Geenius results were indeterminate or negative and required subsequent confirmatory NATs. A total of 8.5% of patients had more than 1 Geenius test in 2017, and 11.2% of the time, results of the first and second tests differed. A total of 74.2% of test sequences matched the CDC-recommended algorithm.

Conclusions: Our study findings suggest that the CDC HIV diagnostic algorithm is complex and may pose suboptimal testing efficiency. Opportunities to improve diagnostic efficiency by reducing indeterminate results and repeat tests are warranted.

真实世界的HIV诊断测试模式在美国。
目的:了解更新后的CDC HIV诊断检测算法在现实世界中的实施情况。研究设计:回顾性数据库分析。方法:使用Quest Diagnostics的数据,我们在2017年1月1日至12月31日期间确定了至少1项HIV-1/HIV-2抗体分化试验(BioRad Geenius HIV 1/2补充测定[Geenius])的患者。研究措施包括符合《健康保险可携带性和责任法案》的患者人口统计数据、检测结果、检测频率和与CDC HIV诊断算法相关的序列,包括HIV-1 RNA定性分析(Aptima)或HIV-2核酸检测(NAT)。结果:共发现26319例患者(平均[SD]年龄40.7[14.3]岁;66.4%男性),进行了28,954次天才检测,7234次Aptima检测和298次HIV-2抗体检测。在26.4%的测试序列中,genius结果为不确定或阴性,需要后续的确认性NATs。2017年,共有8.5%的患者进行了1次以上的天才测试,11.2%的患者第一次和第二次测试的结果不同。共有74.2%的检测序列与cdc推荐的算法匹配。结论:我们的研究结果表明CDC HIV诊断算法是复杂的,可能会造成次优的检测效率。有必要通过减少不确定结果和重复检测来提高诊断效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书