[The Productive Ward programme to provide high quality care: findings from a scoping review].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Elisa Ruatti, Matteo Danielis, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"[The Productive Ward programme to provide high quality care: findings from a scoping review].","authors":"Elisa Ruatti,&nbsp;Matteo Danielis,&nbsp;Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1702/3743.37261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>. The Productive Ward programme to provide high quality care: findings from a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to CareTM is a ward processes- and environments- improvement program intended to help nurses to spend more time on patient care, thus promoting patient safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To define the state-of-science in research on the Productive Ward (PW) program, the set of outcomes documented to date, as well as the factors facilitating or hindering its implementation in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review based on the framework proposed by Levac et al. in 2010, further refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute in 2017, was performed on 2021. Methods and findings have been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Reviews statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 studies have been published from 2014 to 2021, mainly in Europe and England. According to the findings, the PW program has an impact on nurses, patients and the organization. Factors facilitating the PW programme implementation rely on engaging communication, the leadership, the organizational and the managerial support, the additional human and financial resources as well as on the feature of the context and its culture. Resistance to change is the most investigated barrier of PW implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although limited, the evidence suggests that the PW experiences are positive. Factors facilitating and hindering the implementation suggest a map of possible elements to consider before and during the implementation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55447,"journal":{"name":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","volume":"40 4","pages":"221-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1702/3743.37261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

. The Productive Ward programme to provide high quality care: findings from a scoping review.

Introduction: The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to CareTM is a ward processes- and environments- improvement program intended to help nurses to spend more time on patient care, thus promoting patient safety.

Aims: To define the state-of-science in research on the Productive Ward (PW) program, the set of outcomes documented to date, as well as the factors facilitating or hindering its implementation in practice.

Methods: A scoping review based on the framework proposed by Levac et al. in 2010, further refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute in 2017, was performed on 2021. Methods and findings have been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Reviews statement.

Results: 11 studies have been published from 2014 to 2021, mainly in Europe and England. According to the findings, the PW program has an impact on nurses, patients and the organization. Factors facilitating the PW programme implementation rely on engaging communication, the leadership, the organizational and the managerial support, the additional human and financial resources as well as on the feature of the context and its culture. Resistance to change is the most investigated barrier of PW implementation.

Conclusions: Although limited, the evidence suggests that the PW experiences are positive. Factors facilitating and hindering the implementation suggest a map of possible elements to consider before and during the implementation process.

[提供高质量护理的生产性病房计划:范围审查的结果]。
。提供高质量护理的生产性病房方案:范围审查的结果。介绍:高效病房:为护理腾出时间tm是一项病房流程和环境改善计划,旨在帮助护士花更多时间护理患者,从而促进患者安全。目的:定义生产病房(PW)项目研究的科学现状,迄今为止记录的一系列成果,以及促进或阻碍其在实践中实施的因素。方法:基于Levac等人于2010年提出的框架(Joanna Briggs Institute于2017年进一步完善),于2021年进行范围审查。方法和发现已根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目-范围评价声明进行报告。结果:2014 - 2021年共发表研究11篇,主要集中在欧洲和英国。根据调查结果,PW项目对护士、患者和组织都有影响。促进PW方案实施的因素依赖于参与沟通、领导、组织和管理支持、额外的人力和财政资源以及环境及其文化的特点。抗拒改变是PW实施中被调查最多的障碍。结论:尽管有限,证据表明PW的经历是积极的。促进和阻碍执行的因素为在执行过程之前和过程中可能考虑的因素提供了一个地图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca (AIR) è una rivista scientifica che si propone l''obiettivo di promuovere e sviluppare il confronto sulle conoscenze che hanno un impatto sulla pratica, sulla formazione e sulla direzione dell''assistenza infermieristica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信