SUPPORT FOR GENERAL PRACTITONERS DURING COVID-19.

Q3 Medicine
Ulster Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-11
Mark Davies, Davina Carr, Joe Dugan, Nigel Hart, Ruth Kirkpatrick, Claire Loughrey, Paul Loughrey, George O'Neill
{"title":"SUPPORT FOR GENERAL PRACTITONERS DURING COVID-19.","authors":"Mark Davies,&nbsp;Davina Carr,&nbsp;Joe Dugan,&nbsp;Nigel Hart,&nbsp;Ruth Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Claire Loughrey,&nbsp;Paul Loughrey,&nbsp;George O'Neill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of initiatives to support General Practitioners (GPs) during the Covid-19 pandemic is scant.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the impact of a novel method of providing support in the early stages of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study of GPs working in a socially deprived area of Belfast.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was distributed to GPs who had attended a series of educational meetings at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey incorporated the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and questions about the virtual meetings. Follow-up interviews were undertaken with five GPs to further explore their lived experiences and their perceptions of the virtual support forum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a measurable diminution of emotional well-being in GPs in North and West Belfast. Attendees rated a series of virtual meetings highly and described the following themes (<i>and subthemes</i>): a sudden traumatic change (<i>emotional response, fight or flight, painful reminders of the status of general practice in the NHS</i>); a coming together (<i>stepping up to take responsibility, sharing of information, feeling of affirmation</i>); reflections on what worked (<i>calming facilitation, careful selection of speakers, creating the right atmosphere, ownership and autonomy</i>) and building future direction (<i>defining future direction, capitalising on lesson learned</i>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The virtual meetings harnessed the instinct to come together witnessed at the beginning of the pandemic, and as well as sharing valuable information, also provided emotional support along with a sense of comradeship, ownership and autonomy.</p><p><strong>How this fits in: </strong>GPs did not feel included or supported at the outset of the pandemic. Coming together with fellow professionals was a welcome source of support. Professional support can be delivered using a virtual platform. Continued professional development is more acceptable than explicit emotional support, but when done well can bolster resilience and emotional well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":38815,"journal":{"name":"Ulster Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/8c/umj-90-03-151.PMC8581688.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulster Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence of initiatives to support General Practitioners (GPs) during the Covid-19 pandemic is scant.

Aim: To understand the impact of a novel method of providing support in the early stages of the pandemic.

Design and setting: A mixed-methods study of GPs working in a socially deprived area of Belfast.

Method: A survey was distributed to GPs who had attended a series of educational meetings at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey incorporated the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and questions about the virtual meetings. Follow-up interviews were undertaken with five GPs to further explore their lived experiences and their perceptions of the virtual support forum.

Results: The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a measurable diminution of emotional well-being in GPs in North and West Belfast. Attendees rated a series of virtual meetings highly and described the following themes (and subthemes): a sudden traumatic change (emotional response, fight or flight, painful reminders of the status of general practice in the NHS); a coming together (stepping up to take responsibility, sharing of information, feeling of affirmation); reflections on what worked (calming facilitation, careful selection of speakers, creating the right atmosphere, ownership and autonomy) and building future direction (defining future direction, capitalising on lesson learned).

Conclusion: The virtual meetings harnessed the instinct to come together witnessed at the beginning of the pandemic, and as well as sharing valuable information, also provided emotional support along with a sense of comradeship, ownership and autonomy.

How this fits in: GPs did not feel included or supported at the outset of the pandemic. Coming together with fellow professionals was a welcome source of support. Professional support can be delivered using a virtual platform. Continued professional development is more acceptable than explicit emotional support, but when done well can bolster resilience and emotional well-being.

在covid-19期间为全科医生提供支持。
背景:在Covid-19大流行期间支持全科医生(gp)的举措证据不足。目的:了解在大流行早期阶段提供支持的新方法的影响。设计和设置:对在贝尔法斯特社会贫困地区工作的全科医生进行混合方法研究。方法:对在COVID-19大流行开始时参加过一系列教育会议的全科医生进行调查。该调查结合了华威爱丁堡心理健康量表和有关虚拟会议的问题。对五名全科医生进行了后续访谈,以进一步探讨他们的生活经历和他们对虚拟支持论坛的看法。结果:新冠肺炎大流行导致贝尔法斯特北部和西部全科医生的情绪幸福感明显下降。与会者对一系列虚拟会议进行了高度评价,并描述了以下主题(和副主题):突然的创伤性变化(情绪反应,战斗或逃跑,对NHS全科医疗状况的痛苦提醒);一起走到一起(站出来承担责任,分享信息,获得肯定);反思什么是有效的(平静的促进,仔细选择演讲者,创造合适的氛围,所有权和自主权)和构建未来的方向(定义未来的方向,利用经验教训)。结论:虚拟会议利用了大流行开始时人们齐心协力的本能,并分享了宝贵的信息,还提供了情感支持以及同志情谊、所有权和自主权。如何适应:在大流行开始时,全科医生没有感到被纳入或得到支持。与同行的专业人士聚在一起是一个受欢迎的支持来源。可以使用虚拟平台提供专业支持。持续的专业发展比明确的情感支持更容易被接受,但如果做得好,可以增强韧性和情感健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ulster Medical Journal
Ulster Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信