Impact of Variableorientation and Flow Rates on Radiofrequency Ablation Lesions Created by Externally Irrigated Catheters: An Ex-Vivo Study.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of atrial fibrillation Pub Date : 2020-10-31 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.4022/jafib.2353
Nishaki Mehta, Katerina Morgaenko, William Sauer, William Stevenson, David Haines
{"title":"Impact of Variableorientation and Flow Rates on Radiofrequency Ablation Lesions Created by Externally Irrigated Catheters: An Ex-Vivo Study.","authors":"Nishaki Mehta,&nbsp;Katerina Morgaenko,&nbsp;William Sauer,&nbsp;William Stevenson,&nbsp;David Haines","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of variability in irrigation rates and catheter orientation on radiofrequency ablation (RF) lesion creation has not been studied systematically for the uniformly irrigated 56-pore (56P) catheter. This study aimed to analyze the impact of irrigation flow rates (IFRs) and catheter orientation (CO) settings on RF lesions sizes produced by a 56P irrigation catheter in a power-controlled mode using an ex-vivo model. RF lesions were created in strips of chicken muscle in a saline bath heated to 37°C with 56P and 6P catheters using low flow rate (LFR) at 2 cc/min and standard flow (SFR) irrigation rates at 8 cc/min for 56P and 17 cc/min for 6P with horizontal (HO) and vertical (VO) catheter orientations. Ablation power of 20W was delivered for 30 seconds with a mean contact force of 10 g. Sixty RF lesions were analyzed. For the 56P catheter, in contrast to the 6P catheter lesion geometry was independent of CO and IFR in our model. Although 6P catheter had slightly deeper lesions, the overall lesion volumes were similar for 6P and 56P catheters. CO and IFR appeared to have minimal impact on lesion volume creation with 56P catheter. In head-to-head comparison the 6P and 56P irrigated catheters performed similarly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"13 3","pages":"2353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691337/pdf/jafib-13-02353.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impact of variability in irrigation rates and catheter orientation on radiofrequency ablation (RF) lesion creation has not been studied systematically for the uniformly irrigated 56-pore (56P) catheter. This study aimed to analyze the impact of irrigation flow rates (IFRs) and catheter orientation (CO) settings on RF lesions sizes produced by a 56P irrigation catheter in a power-controlled mode using an ex-vivo model. RF lesions were created in strips of chicken muscle in a saline bath heated to 37°C with 56P and 6P catheters using low flow rate (LFR) at 2 cc/min and standard flow (SFR) irrigation rates at 8 cc/min for 56P and 17 cc/min for 6P with horizontal (HO) and vertical (VO) catheter orientations. Ablation power of 20W was delivered for 30 seconds with a mean contact force of 10 g. Sixty RF lesions were analyzed. For the 56P catheter, in contrast to the 6P catheter lesion geometry was independent of CO and IFR in our model. Although 6P catheter had slightly deeper lesions, the overall lesion volumes were similar for 6P and 56P catheters. CO and IFR appeared to have minimal impact on lesion volume creation with 56P catheter. In head-to-head comparison the 6P and 56P irrigated catheters performed similarly.

可变取向和流速对体外冲洗导管射频消融病变的影响:一项离体研究。
对于均匀冲洗56孔(56P)导管,冲洗速率和导管方向的变化对射频消融(RF)病变形成的影响尚未进行系统研究。本研究旨在利用离体模型分析56P灌洗导管在功率控制模式下对射频病变大小的影响,分析灌洗流速(IFRs)和导管定向(CO)设置。将鸡肌肉条置于加热至37°C的盐水浴中,使用56P和6P导管,低流量(LFR)为2 cc/min,标准流量(SFR)为8 cc/min, 56P为17 cc/min,水平(HO)和垂直(VO)导管定向。消融功率为20W,持续30秒,平均接触力为10g。分析60例射频病变。对于56P导管,与6P导管相反,在我们的模型中,病变几何与CO和IFR无关。虽然6P导管病变略深,但6P导管和56P导管的总体病变体积相似。CO和IFR似乎对56P导管的病变体积产生最小的影响。在头对头比较中,6P和56P冲洗导管的表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信