Matthew J Singleton, Lin Y Chen, S Patrick Whalen, Prashant D Bhave, Elijah H Beaty, Joseph Yeboah, Elsayed Z Soliman
{"title":"Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Matthew J Singleton, Lin Y Chen, S Patrick Whalen, Prashant D Bhave, Elijah H Beaty, Joseph Yeboah, Elsayed Z Soliman","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure (BP) lowering on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. Intensive BP lowering is associated with a lower risk of AF among patients with hypertension. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception to June 5, 2020) for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of intensive versus standard (target systolic BP < 140 mmHg) BP lowering on incident AF. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic then used fixed-effects meta-analysis models to report pooled treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals. We also tested for publication bias by three funnel plot-based methods. The quality of each study was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We assessed 16 candidate studies for eligibility from 2,312 published articles, but only three randomized clinical trials were eligible for inclusion and included a combined 12,219 participants with hypertension: Cardio-Sis (Studio Italiano Sugli Effetti Cardiovascolari del Controllo della Pressione Arteriosa Sistolica), ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial), and SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). The target systolic BP in the intensive BP arm was <120 mmHg for participants in SPRINT and ACCORD-BP, but <130 mmHg for participants in Cardio-Sis. Participants randomized to intensive BP lowering had significantly lower risk of incident AF compared with those randomized to standard BP lowering (AF incidence 2.2% vs. 3.0%, respectively; pooled hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.74 (0.59 - 0.93)). Intensive BP lowering is associated with a significantly lower risk of incident AF in patients with hypertension. These findings add to the current evidence supporting the benefits of intensive BP control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"13 4","pages":"2401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691291/pdf/jafib-13-02401.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure (BP) lowering on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. Intensive BP lowering is associated with a lower risk of AF among patients with hypertension. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception to June 5, 2020) for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of intensive versus standard (target systolic BP < 140 mmHg) BP lowering on incident AF. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic then used fixed-effects meta-analysis models to report pooled treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals. We also tested for publication bias by three funnel plot-based methods. The quality of each study was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We assessed 16 candidate studies for eligibility from 2,312 published articles, but only three randomized clinical trials were eligible for inclusion and included a combined 12,219 participants with hypertension: Cardio-Sis (Studio Italiano Sugli Effetti Cardiovascolari del Controllo della Pressione Arteriosa Sistolica), ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial), and SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). The target systolic BP in the intensive BP arm was <120 mmHg for participants in SPRINT and ACCORD-BP, but <130 mmHg for participants in Cardio-Sis. Participants randomized to intensive BP lowering had significantly lower risk of incident AF compared with those randomized to standard BP lowering (AF incidence 2.2% vs. 3.0%, respectively; pooled hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.74 (0.59 - 0.93)). Intensive BP lowering is associated with a significantly lower risk of incident AF in patients with hypertension. These findings add to the current evidence supporting the benefits of intensive BP control.
强化降压与标准降压对房颤(AF)风险的影响尚不确定。在高血压患者中,强化降压与房颤风险降低相关。我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和CENTRAL(从开始到2020年6月5日)的随机对照试验,以评估强化降压与标准降压(目标收缩压< 140 mmHg)对AF事件的影响。我们使用I2统计量评估异质性,然后使用固定效应荟萃分析模型报告合并治疗效果和95%置信区间。我们还通过三种基于漏斗图的方法测试了发表偏倚。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估每项研究的质量。我们从2312篇已发表的文章中评估了16项候选研究,但只有3项随机临床试验符合纳入条件,共纳入了12219名高血压患者:Cardio-Sis (Studio Italiano Sugli Effetti Cardiovascular colari del Controllo della Pressione Arteriosa Sistolica)、ACCORD-BP(控制糖尿病心血管风险的行动血压试验)和SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)。强化血压组目标收缩压为