Management of severe renal disease in anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody-associated vasculitis: the place of rituximab and plasma exchange?

Pauline Morel, Alexandre Karras, Raphaël Porcher, Xavier Belenfant, Vincent Audard, Cédric Rafat, Guillaume Hanouna, Séverine Beaudreuil, Cédric Vilain, Aurélie Hummel, Benjamin Terrier, Evangeline Pillebout, Matthieu Groh, Romain Jouenne, Robin Dhote, Olivier Fain, Matthieu Ponsoye, Nicolas Noel, Nicolas Limal, Xavier Puéchal, Claire Le Jeunne, Loïc Guillevin, Luc Mouthon, Alexis Régent
{"title":"Management of severe renal disease in anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody-associated vasculitis: the place of rituximab and plasma exchange?","authors":"Pauline Morel,&nbsp;Alexandre Karras,&nbsp;Raphaël Porcher,&nbsp;Xavier Belenfant,&nbsp;Vincent Audard,&nbsp;Cédric Rafat,&nbsp;Guillaume Hanouna,&nbsp;Séverine Beaudreuil,&nbsp;Cédric Vilain,&nbsp;Aurélie Hummel,&nbsp;Benjamin Terrier,&nbsp;Evangeline Pillebout,&nbsp;Matthieu Groh,&nbsp;Romain Jouenne,&nbsp;Robin Dhote,&nbsp;Olivier Fain,&nbsp;Matthieu Ponsoye,&nbsp;Nicolas Noel,&nbsp;Nicolas Limal,&nbsp;Xavier Puéchal,&nbsp;Claire Le Jeunne,&nbsp;Loïc Guillevin,&nbsp;Luc Mouthon,&nbsp;Alexis Régent","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keac046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal induction therapy for severe glomerulonephritis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is debated. We compared the efficacy of glucocorticoid and rituximab (RTX) or CYC induction therapy for severe AAV-related glomerulonephritis and evaluated the potential benefit of plasma exchange (PE) as adjunct therapy to CYC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre study included AAV patients with severe renal active disease (serum creatinine level ≥350 µmol/l and/or estimated glomerular filtration ratio ≤15 ml/min/1.73 m2). Propensity-score analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2005 and 2017, 153 patients with AAV-related glomerulonephritis were studied (96 [60%] men; mean [s.d.] age 63 [13.1] years): 19 (12%) were treated with RTX and 134 (88%) with CYC. Remission rates did not differ between RTX- and CYC-treated groups. Although more patients with RTX than CYC were dialysis-free at month (M) 12 (79% vs 68%), the difference was not significant after adjustment. Among 134 patients with CYC-treated glomerulonephritis, 76 (57%) also had PE. M3 and M6 remission rates were comparable for weighted CYC groups with or without PE. For weighted groups, the dialysis-free survival rate with CYC was higher with than without PE at M6 (72% vs 64%; odds ratio 2.58) and M12 (74% vs 60%; odds ratio 2.78) reaching statistical significance at M12.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could not find any difference between RTX and CYC as induction therapy for patients with severe AAV-related glomerulonephritis. In patients receiving CYC induction regimen, the addition of PE conferred short-term benefits with higher dialysis-free rate at M12.</p>","PeriodicalId":379078,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"4056-4064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The optimal induction therapy for severe glomerulonephritis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is debated. We compared the efficacy of glucocorticoid and rituximab (RTX) or CYC induction therapy for severe AAV-related glomerulonephritis and evaluated the potential benefit of plasma exchange (PE) as adjunct therapy to CYC.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentre study included AAV patients with severe renal active disease (serum creatinine level ≥350 µmol/l and/or estimated glomerular filtration ratio ≤15 ml/min/1.73 m2). Propensity-score analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Results: Between 2005 and 2017, 153 patients with AAV-related glomerulonephritis were studied (96 [60%] men; mean [s.d.] age 63 [13.1] years): 19 (12%) were treated with RTX and 134 (88%) with CYC. Remission rates did not differ between RTX- and CYC-treated groups. Although more patients with RTX than CYC were dialysis-free at month (M) 12 (79% vs 68%), the difference was not significant after adjustment. Among 134 patients with CYC-treated glomerulonephritis, 76 (57%) also had PE. M3 and M6 remission rates were comparable for weighted CYC groups with or without PE. For weighted groups, the dialysis-free survival rate with CYC was higher with than without PE at M6 (72% vs 64%; odds ratio 2.58) and M12 (74% vs 60%; odds ratio 2.78) reaching statistical significance at M12.

Conclusion: We could not find any difference between RTX and CYC as induction therapy for patients with severe AAV-related glomerulonephritis. In patients receiving CYC induction regimen, the addition of PE conferred short-term benefits with higher dialysis-free rate at M12.

抗中性粒细胞-细胞质-抗体相关血管炎患者重症肾病的治疗:利妥昔单抗和血浆置换的位置?
目的:探讨anca相关性血管炎(AAV)重症肾小球肾炎的最佳诱导治疗方案。我们比较了糖皮质激素和利妥昔单抗(RTX)或CYC诱导治疗对严重av相关性肾小球肾炎的疗效,并评估了血浆置换(PE)作为CYC辅助治疗的潜在益处。方法:这项回顾性、多中心研究纳入了伴有严重肾活动性疾病的AAV患者(血清肌酐水平≥350µmol/l和/或肾小球滤过率≤15 ml/min/1.73 m2)。倾向得分分析用于调整潜在的混杂因素。结果:2005年至2017年,研究了153例aav相关性肾小球肾炎患者(96例[60%]男性;的意思是[其中。[63][13.1]岁]:RTX治疗19例(12%),CYC治疗134例(88%)。RTX组和cyc组的缓解率没有差异。虽然RTX患者比CYC患者在第12个月无透析(79% vs 68%),但调整后差异不显著。在134例cyc治疗的肾小球肾炎患者中,76例(57%)同时发生PE。有或没有PE的加权CYC组的M3和M6缓解率相当。对于加权组,在M6时,CYC组的无透析生存率高于未PE组(72% vs 64%;优势比2.58)和M12 (74% vs 60%;优势比为2.78),在M12时达到统计学意义。结论:RTX与CYC诱导治疗严重aav相关性肾小球肾炎无明显差异。在接受CYC诱导方案的患者中,在M12时,PE的增加带来了更高的无透析率的短期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书