Patient-held health IT adoption across the primary-secondary care interface: a Normalisation Process Theory perspective.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Systems Pub Date : 2020-09-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146
Stephen McCarthy, Ciara Fitzgerald, Laura Sahm, Colin Bradley, Elaine K Walsh
{"title":"Patient-held health IT adoption across the primary-secondary care interface: a Normalisation Process Theory perspective.","authors":"Stephen McCarthy,&nbsp;Ciara Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Laura Sahm,&nbsp;Colin Bradley,&nbsp;Elaine K Walsh","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-held Health Information Technologies (HIT) can reduce medical error by improving communication between patients and the healthcare team. Despite the proposed benefits, the roll-out of patient-held HIT solutions remains nascent, leaving considerable gaps in our understanding of the adoption challenges inherent. This paper adopts Normalisation Process Theory to study the factors which support or impede the adoption and \"normalisation\" of patient-held HIT, particularly across the primary-secondary care interface. The authors conducted an in-depth case study of HIT adoption across four GP practices, and the wards of a 350 bed hospital. 35 semi-structured interviews were completed. Findings point towards both user-specific and network-specific factors as significant challenges to normalisation across primary-secondary care. This includes factors related to interactional workability, skill set workability, relational integration, and contextual integration. We also discuss challenges specific to patient-held HIT adoption e.g., understanding the patient/clinician experience, supporting informal clinician networks, and spanning across IT boundaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Patient-held Health Information Technologies (HIT) can reduce medical error by improving communication between patients and the healthcare team. Despite the proposed benefits, the roll-out of patient-held HIT solutions remains nascent, leaving considerable gaps in our understanding of the adoption challenges inherent. This paper adopts Normalisation Process Theory to study the factors which support or impede the adoption and "normalisation" of patient-held HIT, particularly across the primary-secondary care interface. The authors conducted an in-depth case study of HIT adoption across four GP practices, and the wards of a 350 bed hospital. 35 semi-structured interviews were completed. Findings point towards both user-specific and network-specific factors as significant challenges to normalisation across primary-secondary care. This includes factors related to interactional workability, skill set workability, relational integration, and contextual integration. We also discuss challenges specific to patient-held HIT adoption e.g., understanding the patient/clinician experience, supporting informal clinician networks, and spanning across IT boundaries.

患者持有的医疗信息技术在初级-二级护理界面的采用:标准化过程理论视角。
患者持有的医疗信息技术(HIT)可以通过改善患者和医疗团队之间的沟通来减少医疗错误。尽管提出了这些好处,但患者持有的医疗保健解决方案的推广仍处于起步阶段,在我们对采用固有挑战的理解上留下了相当大的差距。本文采用正常化过程理论来研究支持或阻碍采用和“正常化”的患者持有的HIT的因素,特别是在初级和二级保健界面。作者进行了一个深入的案例研究,在四个全科医生的做法,和350个床位的医院病房采用HIT。完成了35次半结构化访谈。研究结果指出,用户特定因素和网络特定因素都是初级和二级保健正常化的重大挑战。这包括与交互可操作性、技能集可操作性、关系集成和上下文集成相关的因素。我们还讨论了采用患者持有的医疗信息技术所面临的具体挑战,例如,理解患者/临床医生的经验,支持非正式的临床医生网络,以及跨越IT边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信