Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.

Kerstin Fröber, Vanessa Jurczyk, Gesine Dreisbach
{"title":"Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.","authors":"Kerstin Fröber,&nbsp;Vanessa Jurczyk,&nbsp;Gesine Dreisbach","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frequent forced switching between tasks has been shown to reduce switch costs and increase voluntary switch rates. So far, however, the boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching are unknown. Thus, the present study was aimed to test different aspects of generalizability (across items, tasks, and time) of switching-induced flexibility established in forced-choice trials on voluntary switching in free-choice trials. To this end, stimuli and tasks were systematically varied between forced- and free-choice trials in a hybrid task-switching paradigm. In a series of three experiments, we manipulated forced-choice switch probability (25% vs. 75%) and found that switching-induced flexibility generalizes to new items, but arguably not to new tasks. This task-specific effect is rather short-lived, limited to the first free-choice trial following a forced-choice trial. Underlying mechanisms of switching-induced flexibility, the versatility of flexibility and implications for the trainability of cognitive flexibility are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1249-1262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Frequent forced switching between tasks has been shown to reduce switch costs and increase voluntary switch rates. So far, however, the boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching are unknown. Thus, the present study was aimed to test different aspects of generalizability (across items, tasks, and time) of switching-induced flexibility established in forced-choice trials on voluntary switching in free-choice trials. To this end, stimuli and tasks were systematically varied between forced- and free-choice trials in a hybrid task-switching paradigm. In a series of three experiments, we manipulated forced-choice switch probability (25% vs. 75%) and found that switching-induced flexibility generalizes to new items, but arguably not to new tasks. This task-specific effect is rather short-lived, limited to the first free-choice trial following a forced-choice trial. Underlying mechanisms of switching-induced flexibility, the versatility of flexibility and implications for the trainability of cognitive flexibility are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

保持灵活——保持切换?强制任务切换对自愿任务切换影响的边界条件。
频繁地在不同任务之间进行强制转换已被证明可以降低转换成本并增加自愿转换率。然而,到目前为止,强制任务切换对自愿任务切换影响的边界条件是未知的。因此,本研究旨在测试在强迫选择试验中建立的切换诱导灵活性的不同方面(跨项目、任务和时间)。为此,在混合任务切换范式中,在强迫和自由选择试验中系统地改变刺激和任务。在一系列的三个实验中,我们操纵了强制选择切换概率(25% vs. 75%),发现切换导致的灵活性适用于新道具,但不适用于新任务。这种特定任务的效果相当短暂,仅限于强制选择之后的第一次自由选择试验。讨论了转换诱导灵活性的潜在机制、灵活性的多功能性以及对认知灵活性可训练性的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信