Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Heather Nelson-Brantley, Edward F Ellerbeck, Stacy McCrea-Robertson, Jennifer Brull, Jennifer Bacani McKenney, K Allen Greiner, Christie Befort
{"title":"Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study.","authors":"Heather Nelson-Brantley,&nbsp;Edward F Ellerbeck,&nbsp;Stacy McCrea-Robertson,&nbsp;Jennifer Brull,&nbsp;Jennifer Bacani McKenney,&nbsp;K Allen Greiner,&nbsp;Christie Befort","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2021-001326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe common strategies and practice-specific barriers, adaptations and determinants of cancer screening implementation in eight rural primary care practices in the Midwestern United States after joining an accountable care organisation (ACO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a multiple case study design. Purposive sampling was used to identify a diverse group of practices within the ACO. Data were collected from focus group interviews and workflow mapping. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were cross-analysed by clinic and CFIR domains to identify common themes and practice-specific determinants of cancer screening implementation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study included eight rural primary care practices, defined as Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 5-9, in one ACO in the Midwestern United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Providers, staff and administrators who worked in the primary care practices participated in focus groups. 28 individuals participated including 10 physicians; one doctor of osteopathic medicine; three advanced practice registered nurses; eight registered nurses, quality assurance and licensed practical nurses; one medical assistant; one care coordination manager; and four administrators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With integration into the ACO, practices adopted four new strategies to support cancer screening: care gap lists, huddle sheets, screening via annual wellness visits and information spread. Cross-case analysis revealed that all practices used both visit-based and population-based cancer screening strategies, although workflows varied widely across practices. Each of the four strategies was adapted for fit to the local context of the practice. Participants shared that joining the ACO provided a strong external incentive for increasing cancer screening rates. Two predominant determinants of cancer screening success at the clinic level were use of the electronic health record (EHR) and fully engaging nurses in the screening process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Joining an ACO can be a positive driver for increasing cancer screening practices in rural primary care practices. Characteristics of the practice can impact the success of ACO-related cancer screening efforts; engaging nurses to the fullest extent of their education and training and integrating cancer screening into the EHR can optimise the cancer screening workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/df/fmch-2021-001326.PMC8710423.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To describe common strategies and practice-specific barriers, adaptations and determinants of cancer screening implementation in eight rural primary care practices in the Midwestern United States after joining an accountable care organisation (ACO).

Design: This study used a multiple case study design. Purposive sampling was used to identify a diverse group of practices within the ACO. Data were collected from focus group interviews and workflow mapping. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were cross-analysed by clinic and CFIR domains to identify common themes and practice-specific determinants of cancer screening implementation.

Setting: The study included eight rural primary care practices, defined as Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 5-9, in one ACO in the Midwestern United States.

Participants: Providers, staff and administrators who worked in the primary care practices participated in focus groups. 28 individuals participated including 10 physicians; one doctor of osteopathic medicine; three advanced practice registered nurses; eight registered nurses, quality assurance and licensed practical nurses; one medical assistant; one care coordination manager; and four administrators.

Results: With integration into the ACO, practices adopted four new strategies to support cancer screening: care gap lists, huddle sheets, screening via annual wellness visits and information spread. Cross-case analysis revealed that all practices used both visit-based and population-based cancer screening strategies, although workflows varied widely across practices. Each of the four strategies was adapted for fit to the local context of the practice. Participants shared that joining the ACO provided a strong external incentive for increasing cancer screening rates. Two predominant determinants of cancer screening success at the clinic level were use of the electronic health record (EHR) and fully engaging nurses in the screening process.

Conclusions: Joining an ACO can be a positive driver for increasing cancer screening practices in rural primary care practices. Characteristics of the practice can impact the success of ACO-related cancer screening efforts; engaging nurses to the fullest extent of their education and training and integrating cancer screening into the EHR can optimise the cancer screening workflow.

加入一个负责任的医疗机构后,在农村初级保健实践中实施癌症筛查:一个多案例研究。
目的:描述在加入一个问责制医疗组织(ACO)后,美国中西部八个农村初级保健实践中癌症筛查实施的共同策略和实践特异性障碍、适应和决定因素。设计:本研究采用多案例研究设计。有目的的抽样用于确定ACO内不同的实践组。数据收集自焦点小组访谈和工作流映射。实施研究综合框架(CFIR)用于指导数据收集和分析。通过临床和CFIR领域交叉分析数据,以确定癌症筛查实施的共同主题和实践特异性决定因素。环境:该研究包括美国中西部一个ACO的8个农村初级保健实践,定义为农村-城市连续代码5-9。参与者:在初级保健实践中工作的提供者、工作人员和管理人员参加了焦点小组。28人参与,其中医生10人;一名骨科医生;高级执业注册护士3名;8名注册护士,质量保证和持牌执业护士;一名医疗助理;1名护理协调经理;还有四位管理员。结果:与ACO整合后,实践采用了四种新的策略来支持癌症筛查:护理差距清单,会议表,通过年度健康访问进行筛查和信息传播。跨病例分析显示,尽管工作流程在各个实践中差异很大,但所有实践都使用基于就诊和基于人群的癌症筛查策略。这四种策略中的每一种都适合当地的实践环境。与会者都认为,加入癌检协为提高癌症筛检率提供了强大的外部诱因。在诊所层面,癌症筛查成功的两个主要决定因素是电子健康记录(EHR)的使用和筛查过程中护士的充分参与。结论:加入ACO可以积极推动农村初级保健实践中增加癌症筛查实践。实践的特点可以影响aco相关癌症筛查工作的成功;充分利用护士的教育和培训,并将癌症筛查纳入电子病历,可以优化癌症筛查工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信