Development of a Telemedicine Screening Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Eileen J Kim, Inna Kaminecki, Emily A Gaid, Michael Lopez, Megha Kalia, Jesse Zheng, Alexander Oliver, Hongyan Xu, Thomas J Kim, Desiree Seeyave, Phillip Coule, Matt Lyon
{"title":"Development of a Telemedicine Screening Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Eileen J Kim,&nbsp;Inna Kaminecki,&nbsp;Emily A Gaid,&nbsp;Michael Lopez,&nbsp;Megha Kalia,&nbsp;Jesse Zheng,&nbsp;Alexander Oliver,&nbsp;Hongyan Xu,&nbsp;Thomas J Kim,&nbsp;Desiree Seeyave,&nbsp;Phillip Coule,&nbsp;Matt Lyon","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to concerns for patient and provider safety. Given the lack of testing resources initially and the large geographical range served by Augusta University (AU), a telemedicine platform with up-to-date screening guidelines was implemented for COVID-19 testing in March 2020. Our objective was to understand the level of adherence to telemedicine screening guidelines for COVID-19. <b>Methods:</b> The study population included health care providers and population who participated in an encounter in the AU Health Express Care virtual care program from March 22 to May 21, 2020. All encounters were intended to be for COVID-19 screening, free, and available 24 h per day, 7 days per week. Screening guidelines were developed by AU based on information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Georgia Department of Public Health. <b>Results:</b> Among 17,801 total encounters, 13,600 were included in the final analysis. Overall adherence to screening guidelines was 71% in the adult population and 57% in the pediatric population. When providers did not follow guidelines, 72% determined that the patient should have a positive screen. Guidelines themselves determined that only 52% of encounters should have a positive screen. Providers' specialty significantly correlated with guideline adherence (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Departments with the highest adherence were psychiatry, neurology, and ophthalmology. No significant correlation was found between guideline adherence and provider degree/position. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides proof of concept of a free telehealth screening platform during an ongoing pandemic. Our screening experience was effective and different specialties participated. Our patient population lived in lower than average income zip codes, suggesting that our free telemedicine screening program successfully reached populations with higher financial barriers to health care. Early training and a posteriori knowledge of telemedicine was likely key to screening guideline adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1199-1205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to concerns for patient and provider safety. Given the lack of testing resources initially and the large geographical range served by Augusta University (AU), a telemedicine platform with up-to-date screening guidelines was implemented for COVID-19 testing in March 2020. Our objective was to understand the level of adherence to telemedicine screening guidelines for COVID-19. Methods: The study population included health care providers and population who participated in an encounter in the AU Health Express Care virtual care program from March 22 to May 21, 2020. All encounters were intended to be for COVID-19 screening, free, and available 24 h per day, 7 days per week. Screening guidelines were developed by AU based on information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Georgia Department of Public Health. Results: Among 17,801 total encounters, 13,600 were included in the final analysis. Overall adherence to screening guidelines was 71% in the adult population and 57% in the pediatric population. When providers did not follow guidelines, 72% determined that the patient should have a positive screen. Guidelines themselves determined that only 52% of encounters should have a positive screen. Providers' specialty significantly correlated with guideline adherence (p = 0.002). Departments with the highest adherence were psychiatry, neurology, and ophthalmology. No significant correlation was found between guideline adherence and provider degree/position. Conclusions: This study provides proof of concept of a free telehealth screening platform during an ongoing pandemic. Our screening experience was effective and different specialties participated. Our patient population lived in lower than average income zip codes, suggesting that our free telemedicine screening program successfully reached populations with higher financial barriers to health care. Early training and a posteriori knowledge of telemedicine was likely key to screening guideline adherence.

在COVID-19大流行期间制定远程医疗筛查计划。
背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,由于对患者和提供者安全的担忧,远程医疗的使用有所增加。鉴于最初缺乏检测资源以及奥古斯塔大学服务的大地理范围,2020年3月实施了一个具有最新筛查指南的远程医疗平台,用于COVID-19检测。我们的目标是了解COVID-19远程医疗筛查指南的遵守程度。方法:研究人群包括2020年3月22日至5月21日参加非盟健康快速护理虚拟护理计划会议的卫生保健提供者和人群。所有接触均为COVID-19筛查,免费,每周7天,每天24小时提供服务。非盟根据疾病控制和预防中心以及乔治亚州公共卫生部提供的信息制定了筛查指南。结果:在总共17801次接触中,有13600次被纳入最终分析。总体上,成人对筛查指南的遵守率为71%,儿童为57%。当提供者没有遵循指导方针时,72%的人认为患者应该进行阳性筛查。指导方针本身确定,只有52%的接触应该是阳性的。医师专业与指南依从性显著相关(p = 0.002)。依从性最高的科室是精神科、神经科和眼科。指南依从性与提供者学位/职位之间无显著相关性。结论:本研究证明了在持续大流行期间建立免费远程医疗筛查平台的概念。我们的筛选经验是有效的,不同的专业都参与了。我们的患者居住在收入低于平均水平的地区,这表明我们的免费远程医疗筛查项目成功地覆盖了那些在医疗保健方面有较高经济障碍的人群。早期培训和事后远程医疗知识可能是筛选指南依从性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信