ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES AND GHG EMISSIONS.

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 0 ECONOMICS
Jared Creason, Jameel Alsalam, Kong Chiu, Allen A Fawcett
{"title":"ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES AND GHG EMISSIONS.","authors":"Jared Creason,&nbsp;Jameel Alsalam,&nbsp;Kong Chiu,&nbsp;Allen A Fawcett","doi":"10.1142/s201000782150010x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyzes changes in U.S. energy-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) manufacturing over the past decade, through the lens of previously proposed climate policy measures. The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 defined measures and thresholds for EITE eligibility and proposed compensatory allowances designed to reduce negative competitive impacts to domestic industry and to prevent emissions leakage. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the 2009 eligibility criteria, using the same methods with more recent data to examine trends over the 2004-2017 period. We find that energy intensity, emissions intensity, output, and emissions have fluctuated with economic conditions, and defining measures and thresholds that remain informative is challenging. Had ACES been enacted as written and not revised, the number of sectors qualifying for rebates would have decreased from 39 to 26, after adjustment for the changes in North American Industry Classification System definitions. Emissions from the eligible sectors fell 26% across the three periods of analysis, while emissions from manufacturing as a whole fell 5%. We decompose the changes in emissions into scale and intensity measures based on a hybrid measure derived from Grossman and Krueger [(1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, PM Garber (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] and Kaya and Yokoburi [(1997). Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. Tokyo: United Nations University Press]. As an alternative, we perform the same analyses using the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program data. These data, not available when ACES was written, offer annual greenhouse gas estimates for facilities that emit more than 25,000 tons CO<sub>2</sub>e annually. Finally, we draw some recommendations for future policy including (1) using measures that make price level adjustments straightforward or unnecessary, (2) keeping EITE policy focused on a small group of industries to minimize sectoral reclassification problems, (3) identifying industries prone to emissions leakage rather than just changes in output and (4) consider spatial heterogeneity of emissions and trade patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":45922,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8687101/pdf/nihms-1752224.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Change Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s201000782150010x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper analyzes changes in U.S. energy-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) manufacturing over the past decade, through the lens of previously proposed climate policy measures. The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 defined measures and thresholds for EITE eligibility and proposed compensatory allowances designed to reduce negative competitive impacts to domestic industry and to prevent emissions leakage. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the 2009 eligibility criteria, using the same methods with more recent data to examine trends over the 2004-2017 period. We find that energy intensity, emissions intensity, output, and emissions have fluctuated with economic conditions, and defining measures and thresholds that remain informative is challenging. Had ACES been enacted as written and not revised, the number of sectors qualifying for rebates would have decreased from 39 to 26, after adjustment for the changes in North American Industry Classification System definitions. Emissions from the eligible sectors fell 26% across the three periods of analysis, while emissions from manufacturing as a whole fell 5%. We decompose the changes in emissions into scale and intensity measures based on a hybrid measure derived from Grossman and Krueger [(1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, PM Garber (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] and Kaya and Yokoburi [(1997). Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. Tokyo: United Nations University Press]. As an alternative, we perform the same analyses using the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program data. These data, not available when ACES was written, offer annual greenhouse gas estimates for facilities that emit more than 25,000 tons CO2e annually. Finally, we draw some recommendations for future policy including (1) using measures that make price level adjustments straightforward or unnecessary, (2) keeping EITE policy focused on a small group of industries to minimize sectoral reclassification problems, (3) identifying industries prone to emissions leakage rather than just changes in output and (4) consider spatial heterogeneity of emissions and trade patterns.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

能源密集型制造业和温室气体排放。
本文通过先前提出的气候政策措施,分析了美国能源密集型、贸易暴露(EITE)制造业在过去十年中的变化。2009年的《美国清洁能源和安全法》规定了EITE资格的措施和门槛,并提出了补偿性津贴,旨在减少对国内工业的负面竞争影响,防止排放泄漏。我们对2009年的资格标准进行了回顾性分析,使用相同的方法和最近的数据来检查2004-2017年期间的趋势。我们发现,能源强度、排放强度、产出和排放量随着经济状况的变化而波动,确定仍然具有信息量的度量和阈值是具有挑战性的。如果ACES以书面形式颁布而不进行修订,在调整了北美工业分类系统定义的变化后,有资格获得退税的行业数量将从39个减少到26个。在三个分析期间,符合条件的行业的排放量下降了26%,而整个制造业的排放量下降了5%。我们根据Grossman和Krueger[(1993)]提出的混合度量方法,将排放变化分解为尺度和强度度量。北美自由贸易协定对环境的影响。《美墨自由贸易协定》,加伯总理主编。剑桥,马萨诸塞州:麻省理工学院出版社]和Kaya和Yokoburi[(1997)。环境、能源和经济:可持续发展战略。东京:联合国大学出版社。作为替代方案,我们使用EPA的温室气体报告计划数据执行相同的分析。这些数据提供了每年排放超过2.5万吨二氧化碳当量的设施的年度温室气体排放量,在ACES编写时还无法获得。最后,我们对未来的政策提出了一些建议,包括:(1)使用使价格水平调整变得直接或不必要的措施;(2)将EITE政策的重点放在一小部分行业上,以尽量减少部门重新分类问题;(3)识别容易发生排放泄漏的行业,而不仅仅是产出的变化;(4)考虑排放和贸易模式的空间异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Climate Change Economics (CCE) publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to analyses of mitigation, adaptation, impacts, and other issues related to the policy and management of greenhouse gases. CCE is specifically devoted to papers in economics although it is understood that authors may need to rely on other fields for important insights. The journal is interested in papers examining the issue at every scale from local to global and papers from around the world are encouraged. CCE is also interested in both original research and review papers and welcomes comments discussing previous articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信