Optic Nerve Lesion Length at the Acute Phase of Optic Neuritis Is Predictive of Retinal Neuronal Loss.

IF 7.5
Mickael Denis, Jean-Philippe Woillez, Vasily M Smirnov, Elodie Drumez, Julien Lannoy, Julie Boucher, Mickael Zedet, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Julien Labreuche, Helene Zephir, Xavier Leclerc, Olivier Outteryck
{"title":"Optic Nerve Lesion Length at the Acute Phase of Optic Neuritis Is Predictive of Retinal Neuronal Loss.","authors":"Mickael Denis,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Woillez,&nbsp;Vasily M Smirnov,&nbsp;Elodie Drumez,&nbsp;Julien Lannoy,&nbsp;Julie Boucher,&nbsp;Mickael Zedet,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Pruvo,&nbsp;Julien Labreuche,&nbsp;Helene Zephir,&nbsp;Xavier Leclerc,&nbsp;Olivier Outteryck","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000001135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Acute optic neuritis (ON) is a classical presenting symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and anti-MOG-associated disorders. The resulting visual impairment is variable and can be severe. Clinicians are in need of predictive biomarkers to optimize the management of acute ON. In this longitudinal study (IRMANO, NCT03651662), we evaluated the ability of optic nerve lesion length measured on MRI at the acute phase of ON to predict retinal neuro-axonal loss and visual impairment at a chronic stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal study (IRMANO, NCT03651662) of patients who presented a clinical episode of ON (≤8 weeks). All patients underwent a retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) and a brain/optic nerve MRI, including 3D double-inversion recovery (DIR) sequence at the acute phase of ON and 12 months later. Primary outcomes were optic nerve DIR hypersignal lesion length, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) volume measured on OCT, and low-contrast monocular visual acuity (LCMVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group included 51 patients (33 women, mean age of 32.4 years ± 7.9). We recruited patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (n = 20), a relapsing-remitting MS (n = 23), an isolated ON (n = 6), and a first clinical episode of NMOSD (n = 2). Optic nerve DIR hypersignal was observed in all but 1 symptomatic optic nerves. At inclusion, the mean optic nerve lesion length (in mm) was 12.35 ± 5.98. The mean GCIPL volume (in mm<sup>3</sup>) significantly decreased between inclusion (1.90 ± 0.18) and M<sub>12</sub> (1.67 ± 0.21; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Optic nerve lesion length at inclusion was significantly associated with GCIPL thinning (estimate ± SD; -0.012 ± 0.004; <i>p</i> = 0.0016) and LCMVA at M<sub>12</sub> (0.016 ± 0.003; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Optic nerve lesion length significantly increased at M<sub>12</sub> (15.76 ± 8.70; <i>p</i> = 0.0007). The increase in optic nerve lesion length was significantly associated with the GCIPL thinning between inclusion and M<sub>12</sub> (-0.012 ± 0.003; <i>p</i> = 0.0011).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>At the acute phase of ON, optic nerve lesion length is an imaging biomarker predictive of retinal neuro-axonal loss and chronic visual impairment, which can help to stratify future therapeutic strategies in acute ON.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class I evidence that optic nerve lesion length measured on MRI during the acute phase of a first episode of ON is associated with long-term retinal neuro-axonal loss and visual impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520720,"journal":{"name":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/d0/NEURIMMINFL2021039451.PMC8802684.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background and objectives: Acute optic neuritis (ON) is a classical presenting symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and anti-MOG-associated disorders. The resulting visual impairment is variable and can be severe. Clinicians are in need of predictive biomarkers to optimize the management of acute ON. In this longitudinal study (IRMANO, NCT03651662), we evaluated the ability of optic nerve lesion length measured on MRI at the acute phase of ON to predict retinal neuro-axonal loss and visual impairment at a chronic stage.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study (IRMANO, NCT03651662) of patients who presented a clinical episode of ON (≤8 weeks). All patients underwent a retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) and a brain/optic nerve MRI, including 3D double-inversion recovery (DIR) sequence at the acute phase of ON and 12 months later. Primary outcomes were optic nerve DIR hypersignal lesion length, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) volume measured on OCT, and low-contrast monocular visual acuity (LCMVA).

Results: The study group included 51 patients (33 women, mean age of 32.4 years ± 7.9). We recruited patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (n = 20), a relapsing-remitting MS (n = 23), an isolated ON (n = 6), and a first clinical episode of NMOSD (n = 2). Optic nerve DIR hypersignal was observed in all but 1 symptomatic optic nerves. At inclusion, the mean optic nerve lesion length (in mm) was 12.35 ± 5.98. The mean GCIPL volume (in mm3) significantly decreased between inclusion (1.90 ± 0.18) and M12 (1.67 ± 0.21; p < 0.0001). Optic nerve lesion length at inclusion was significantly associated with GCIPL thinning (estimate ± SD; -0.012 ± 0.004; p = 0.0016) and LCMVA at M12 (0.016 ± 0.003; p < 0.001). Optic nerve lesion length significantly increased at M12 (15.76 ± 8.70; p = 0.0007). The increase in optic nerve lesion length was significantly associated with the GCIPL thinning between inclusion and M12 (-0.012 ± 0.003; p = 0.0011).

Discussion: At the acute phase of ON, optic nerve lesion length is an imaging biomarker predictive of retinal neuro-axonal loss and chronic visual impairment, which can help to stratify future therapeutic strategies in acute ON.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that optic nerve lesion length measured on MRI during the acute phase of a first episode of ON is associated with long-term retinal neuro-axonal loss and visual impairment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

视神经炎急性期视神经损伤长度预测视网膜神经元损失。
背景和目的:急性视神经炎(ON)是多发性硬化症(MS)、视谱神经脊髓炎(NMOSD)和抗mog相关疾病的典型表现。由此产生的视力损害是可变的,可能很严重。临床医生需要预测性生物标志物来优化急性ON的管理。在这项纵向研究(IRMANO, NCT03651662)中,我们评估了视神经病变在急性期MRI测量视神经损伤长度的能力,以预测慢性期视网膜神经轴突损失和视力损害。方法:我们对出现临床发作(≤8周)的ON患者进行了一项纵向研究(IRMANO, NCT03651662)。所有患者均接受视网膜光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和脑/视神经MRI,包括急性期和12个月后的3D双反转恢复(DIR)序列。主要观察视神经DIR高信号病变长度、OCT测量黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)体积、低对比单眼视力(LCMVA)。结果:研究组纳入51例患者,其中女性33例,平均年龄32.4岁±7.9岁。我们招募了临床孤立综合征(n = 20)、复发缓解型MS (n = 23)、孤立性ON (n = 6)和首次临床NMOSD发作(n = 2)的患者。除了1例症状性视神经外,所有患者均观察到视神经DIR高信号。纳入时视神经损伤平均长度(mm)为12.35±5.98。GCIPL的平均体积(mm3)在入组(1.90±0.18)和M12(1.67±0.21)之间显著降低;P < 0.0001)。视神经病变长度与GCIPL变薄显著相关(估计±SD;-0.012±0.004;p = 0.0016), M12时LCMVA(0.016±0.003;P < 0.001)。M12时视神经损伤长度显著增加(15.76±8.70);P = 0.0007)。视神经病变长度的增加与GCIPL在M12和包埋之间变薄显著相关(-0.012±0.003;P = 0.0011)。讨论:在急性期,视神经损伤长度是预测视网膜神经轴突丧失和慢性视力损害的成像生物标志物,这有助于对急性视神经病变的未来治疗策略进行分层。证据分类:本研究提供了I级证据,证明视神经病变长度在视神经炎首次发作急性期的MRI测量与长期视网膜神经轴突丧失和视力损害有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信