QEEG Biomarkers for ECT Treatment Response in Schizophrenia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-18 DOI:10.1177/15500594211058260
Jiayue Cheng, Yanyan Ren, Qiumeng Gu, Yongguang He, Zhen Wang
{"title":"QEEG Biomarkers for ECT Treatment Response in Schizophrenia.","authors":"Jiayue Cheng,&nbsp;Yanyan Ren,&nbsp;Qiumeng Gu,&nbsp;Yongguang He,&nbsp;Zhen Wang","doi":"10.1177/15500594211058260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a clinically effective treatment for schizophrenia (SZD). However, studies have shown that only about 50 to 80% of patients show response to ECT. To identify the most suitable patients for ECT, developing biomarkers predicting ECT response remains an important goal. This study aimed to explore the quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers to predict ECT efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty patients who met DSM-5 criteria for SZD and had been assigned to ECT were recruited. 32-lead Resting-EEG recordings were collected one hour before the initial ECT treatment. Positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS) was assessed at baseline and after the eighth ECT session. EEG data were analyzed using mutual information. <b>Results:</b> In the brain network density threshold range of 0.05 to 0.2, the assortativity of the right temporal, right parietal, and right occipital cortex in the response group was significantly higher than that in the non-response group (<i>p</i> <i><</i> <i>.05</i>) in the beta band. In the theta band, the left frontal, parietal, right occipital cortex, and central area assortativity were higher in the response group than in the non-response group (<i>p</i> <i><</i> <i>.05</i>). <b>Conclusions:</b> QEEG might be a useful approach to identify the candidate biomarker for ECT in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":"53 6","pages":"499-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594211058260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a clinically effective treatment for schizophrenia (SZD). However, studies have shown that only about 50 to 80% of patients show response to ECT. To identify the most suitable patients for ECT, developing biomarkers predicting ECT response remains an important goal. This study aimed to explore the quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers to predict ECT efficacy. Methods: Thirty patients who met DSM-5 criteria for SZD and had been assigned to ECT were recruited. 32-lead Resting-EEG recordings were collected one hour before the initial ECT treatment. Positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS) was assessed at baseline and after the eighth ECT session. EEG data were analyzed using mutual information. Results: In the brain network density threshold range of 0.05 to 0.2, the assortativity of the right temporal, right parietal, and right occipital cortex in the response group was significantly higher than that in the non-response group (p<.05) in the beta band. In the theta band, the left frontal, parietal, right occipital cortex, and central area assortativity were higher in the response group than in the non-response group (p<.05). Conclusions: QEEG might be a useful approach to identify the candidate biomarker for ECT in clinical practice.

精神分裂症ECT治疗反应的QEEG生物标志物。
背景:电痉挛治疗(ECT)是一种临床有效的治疗精神分裂症(SZD)的方法。然而,研究表明,只有大约50%到80%的患者对ECT有反应。为了确定最适合ECT的患者,开发预测ECT反应的生物标志物仍然是一个重要的目标。本研究旨在探讨定量脑电图(QEEG)生物标志物预测ECT疗效。方法:招募30例符合DSM-5标准的SZD患者,并分配电痉挛治疗。32导联静息脑电图记录采集于ECT治疗前1小时。在基线和第八次电痉挛治疗后评估阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)。利用互信息分析脑电数据。结果:在0.05 ~ 0.2的脑网络密度阈值范围内,反应组的右颞叶、右顶叶和右枕叶皮质在β波段的匹配性显著高于非反应组(p . 0.05)。在θ波段,反应组的左额叶、顶叶、右枕叶皮层和中央区域的协调性高于无反应组(p . 0.05)。结论:在临床实践中,QEEG可能是确定ECT候选生物标志物的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信