Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Nursing Staff at an Academic Medical Center: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 NURSING

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1177/10783903211066125

Amanda B Lykins, Natalie W Seroka, Mark Mayor, Sarret Seng, Jacob T Higgins, Chizimuzo T C Okoli

{"title":"Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Nursing Staff at an Academic Medical Center: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Amanda B Lykins, Natalie W Seroka, Mark Mayor, Sarret Seng, Jacob T Higgins, Chizimuzo T C Okoli","doi":"10.1177/10783903211066125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although several studies have recently described compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in nurses, few to date have examined these issues across nursing specialties. Such examination is needed to inform future nursing-subspecialty tailored interventions.Aims: To examine (1) differences in CS, BO, and STS across nursing specialties and (2) differences associated with demographic, work-related, and behavioral factors among nurses.Method: A secondary analysis of survey responses from nurses (N = 350) at an academic medical center. Demographic, behavioral, work-related, and professional quality of life variables were analyzed using hierarchical regression analyses.Results: CS, BO, and STS scores significantly varied across specialties with emergency nurses experiencing significantly elevated rates of BO and STS, and lowest rates of CS; scores were also differentially associated with demographic, work-related, behavioral, and workplace violence variables.Conclusions: Key differences in CS, BO, and STS by nursing specialty suggests the importance of tailoring BO and STS mitigative interventions. BO and STS risk factors should be assessed in nurses (e.g., behavioral health problems and poor sleep quality) and specialty-specific interventions (e.g., reducing workplace violence exposure in emergency settings) may be considered to improve CS while reducing BO and STS among nurses.","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903211066125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although several studies have recently described compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in nurses, few to date have examined these issues across nursing specialties. Such examination is needed to inform future nursing-subspecialty tailored interventions.

Aims: To examine (1) differences in CS, BO, and STS across nursing specialties and (2) differences associated with demographic, work-related, and behavioral factors among nurses.

Method: A secondary analysis of survey responses from nurses (N = 350) at an academic medical center. Demographic, behavioral, work-related, and professional quality of life variables were analyzed using hierarchical regression analyses.

Results: CS, BO, and STS scores significantly varied across specialties with emergency nurses experiencing significantly elevated rates of BO and STS, and lowest rates of CS; scores were also differentially associated with demographic, work-related, behavioral, and workplace violence variables.

Conclusions: Key differences in CS, BO, and STS by nursing specialty suggests the importance of tailoring BO and STS mitigative interventions. BO and STS risk factors should be assessed in nurses (e.g., behavioral health problems and poor sleep quality) and specialty-specific interventions (e.g., reducing workplace violence exposure in emergency settings) may be considered to improve CS while reducing BO and STS among nurses.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术医疗中心护理人员的同情心满意度、职业倦怠和继发性创伤压力：横断面分析

背景：尽管最近有几项研究对护士的同情心满意度（CS）、职业倦怠（BO）和继发性创伤压力（STS）进行了描述，但迄今为止，很少有研究对这些问题进行跨护理专业的研究。目的：研究（1）不同护理专业护士在同情心满意度（CS）、职业倦怠（BO）和继发性创伤压力（STS）方面的差异；（2）与护士人口统计、工作相关和行为因素有关的差异：对一家学术医疗中心的护士（N = 350）的调查回复进行二次分析。采用分层回归分析法对人口统计学、行为学、工作相关和职业生活质量变量进行了分析：CS、BO和STS得分在不同专业之间存在显著差异，急诊护士的BO和STS得分率显著升高，而CS得分率最低；得分还与人口统计学、工作相关、行为和工作场所暴力等变量存在不同关联：结论：不同护理专业在 CS、BO 和 STS 方面的主要差异表明，有针对性地采取减轻 BO 和 STS 的干预措施非常重要。应评估护士的BO和STS风险因素（如行为健康问题和睡眠质量差），并考虑采取针对具体专业的干预措施（如减少急救环境中的工作场所暴力暴露），以改善CS，同时减少护士的BO和STS。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association NURSING-PSYCHIATRY

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).