Assessment and outcomes of firefighter applicants with possible asthma.

T Kabir, S Schofield, B Fitzgerald, J Cannon, J Szram, J Feary
{"title":"Assessment and outcomes of firefighter applicants with possible asthma.","authors":"T Kabir,&nbsp;S Schofield,&nbsp;B Fitzgerald,&nbsp;J Cannon,&nbsp;J Szram,&nbsp;J Feary","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqab162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firefighter applicants (FFAs) with a history of asthma may be refused entry to the fire service because of potentially putting themselves and others at risk.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We undertook a service evaluation to identify respiratory and employment outcomes of FFAs with a history of asthma who had undergone additional respiratory assessment at our specialist occupational lung disease clinic during 2005-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed FFA medical records and categorized them as having either no current asthma or definite/probable asthma at the time of clinic assessment. 'No current asthma' was defined as negative non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) to histamine/methacholine, and no symptoms or treatment within the 2 years before clinic. 'Definite/probable current asthma' was defined as either positive BHR, or negative BHR with symptoms and/or treatment within the previous 2 years. Around 1 year later, we contacted FFAs to enquire about their application outcome and current respiratory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were available on 116 applicants; of whom, 45% (n = 52) had definite/probable current asthma and were significantly more likely to be older, atopic to common aeroallergens, report atopic disease and have a lower forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio compared with applicants with no current asthma. Only two individuals' applications were rejected due to asthma. At follow-up, just 2 (2%) of the 90 operational firefighters reported any recent trouble with asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A history of asthma alone is not sufficient to determine current asthma in FFAs. Even with a diagnosis of current asthma, FFAs are mostly successful in their application to join the fire service.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Firefighter applicants (FFAs) with a history of asthma may be refused entry to the fire service because of potentially putting themselves and others at risk.

Aims: We undertook a service evaluation to identify respiratory and employment outcomes of FFAs with a history of asthma who had undergone additional respiratory assessment at our specialist occupational lung disease clinic during 2005-19.

Methods: We reviewed FFA medical records and categorized them as having either no current asthma or definite/probable asthma at the time of clinic assessment. 'No current asthma' was defined as negative non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) to histamine/methacholine, and no symptoms or treatment within the 2 years before clinic. 'Definite/probable current asthma' was defined as either positive BHR, or negative BHR with symptoms and/or treatment within the previous 2 years. Around 1 year later, we contacted FFAs to enquire about their application outcome and current respiratory symptoms.

Results: Data were available on 116 applicants; of whom, 45% (n = 52) had definite/probable current asthma and were significantly more likely to be older, atopic to common aeroallergens, report atopic disease and have a lower forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio compared with applicants with no current asthma. Only two individuals' applications were rejected due to asthma. At follow-up, just 2 (2%) of the 90 operational firefighters reported any recent trouble with asthma.

Conclusions: A history of asthma alone is not sufficient to determine current asthma in FFAs. Even with a diagnosis of current asthma, FFAs are mostly successful in their application to join the fire service.

可能患有哮喘的消防员申请人的评估和结果。
背景:有哮喘病史的消防员申请人(FFAs)可能会被拒绝进入消防部门,因为他们可能会使自己和他人处于危险之中。目的:我们进行了一项服务评估,以确定2005-19年期间在我们的专业职业肺病诊所接受额外呼吸评估的有哮喘病史的自由职业者的呼吸和就业结果。方法:我们回顾了FFA的医疗记录,并在临床评估时将他们归类为目前没有哮喘或明确/可能患有哮喘。“无当前哮喘”定义为对组胺/甲胆碱非特异性支气管高反应性(BHR)阴性,就诊前2年内无症状或未接受治疗。“明确/可能当前哮喘”定义为BHR阳性,或BHR阴性,且在过去2年内出现症状和/或接受治疗。大约一年后,我们联系了ffa,询问他们的应用结果和目前的呼吸道症状。结果:获得116名申请人的数据;其中,45% (n = 52)患有明确/可能的哮喘,并且与没有哮喘的申请人相比,年龄较大,对常见的空气过敏原有特应性反应,报告有特应性疾病,一秒钟用力呼气量/用力肺活量比较低的可能性更大。只有两个人的申请因哮喘被拒绝。在随访中,90名消防员中只有2人(2%)报告最近有哮喘问题。结论:仅凭哮喘病史不足以确定ffa患者当前的哮喘情况。即使诊断出患有哮喘,FFAs也大多能成功申请加入消防部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信