Diagnostic Accuracy of e-FAST in Stable Blunt Trauma Chest: A Prospective Analysis of 110 Cases at a Tertiary Care Center.

IF 1.5
Hannock Devadoss, Pawan Sharma, Vipin V Nair, Simarjit S Rehsi, Nilanjan Roy, Pankaj P Rao
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of e-FAST in Stable Blunt Trauma Chest: A Prospective Analysis of 110 Cases at a Tertiary Care Center.","authors":"Hannock Devadoss,&nbsp;Pawan Sharma,&nbsp;Vipin V Nair,&nbsp;Simarjit S Rehsi,&nbsp;Nilanjan Roy,&nbsp;Pankaj P Rao","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is an important adjunct and an extension of the clinical examination in an emergency setting for the last three decades. e-FAST visualizes the lung bases and injuries related to the lungs in addition to the intra-abdominal and pericardial bleed. In trauma patients, time is precious. Noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) chest is the gold standard for the evaluation of blunt trauma chest. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming and leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, evaluation of trauma patients at the trauma bay with e-FAST which is available at all times will not only save time but also the lives of trauma patients. Our endeavor is to find whether e-FAST can be substituted for NCCT for assessing injuries accurately in a stable blunt trauma patient.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>Prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care trauma center during the period of November 2017 to 2019. Of the 197 patients presenting to the trauma surgeon in the trauma center, 110 were included in the study after satisfying the inclusion criteria. Eighty-seven patients being hemodynamically unstable were excluded from the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical significance in the comparative data between the groups and all with \"<i>p</i>\" values more than 0.05. This accepts the null hypothesis and establishes the fact that there is no difference between NCCT chest which is the gold standard for chest blunt trauma and e-FAST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that e-FAST is a better adjunct to the diagnosis and management of blunt trauma chest patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Devadoss H, Sharma P, Nair VV, Rehsi SS, Roy N, Rao PP. Diagnostic Accuracy of e-FAST in Stable Blunt Trauma Chest: A Prospective Analysis of 110 Cases at a Tertiary Care Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1167-1172.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1167-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/4e/ijccm-25-1167.PMC8645814.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is an important adjunct and an extension of the clinical examination in an emergency setting for the last three decades. e-FAST visualizes the lung bases and injuries related to the lungs in addition to the intra-abdominal and pericardial bleed. In trauma patients, time is precious. Noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) chest is the gold standard for the evaluation of blunt trauma chest. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming and leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, evaluation of trauma patients at the trauma bay with e-FAST which is available at all times will not only save time but also the lives of trauma patients. Our endeavor is to find whether e-FAST can be substituted for NCCT for assessing injuries accurately in a stable blunt trauma patient.

Patient and methods: Prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care trauma center during the period of November 2017 to 2019. Of the 197 patients presenting to the trauma surgeon in the trauma center, 110 were included in the study after satisfying the inclusion criteria. Eighty-seven patients being hemodynamically unstable were excluded from the study.

Results: There was no statistical significance in the comparative data between the groups and all with "p" values more than 0.05. This accepts the null hypothesis and establishes the fact that there is no difference between NCCT chest which is the gold standard for chest blunt trauma and e-FAST.

Conclusion: We conclude that e-FAST is a better adjunct to the diagnosis and management of blunt trauma chest patients.

How to cite this article: Devadoss H, Sharma P, Nair VV, Rehsi SS, Roy N, Rao PP. Diagnostic Accuracy of e-FAST in Stable Blunt Trauma Chest: A Prospective Analysis of 110 Cases at a Tertiary Care Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1167-1172.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

e-FAST对稳定钝性胸外伤的诊断准确性:对某三级医疗中心110例病例的前瞻性分析。
背景:在过去的三十年中,创伤超声集中评估(FAST)是紧急情况下临床检查的重要辅助和延伸。e-FAST可以显示肺基底和与肺相关的损伤,以及腹内和心包出血。对于创伤患者来说,时间是宝贵的。胸部非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)是评估钝性创伤胸部的金标准。然而,它既繁琐又耗时,并导致发病率和死亡率增加。因此,使用随时可用的e-FAST在创伤室对创伤患者进行评估,不仅可以节省时间,而且可以挽救创伤患者的生命。我们的努力是寻找e-FAST是否可以代替NCCT来准确评估稳定的钝性创伤患者的损伤。患者与方法:于2017年11月至2019年11月在某三级创伤中心进行前瞻性观察研究。在创伤中心就诊的197例患者中,110例符合纳入标准,纳入研究。87例血流动力学不稳定的患者被排除在研究之外。结果:组间比较资料差异无统计学意义,p值均大于0.05。这就接受了零假设,并确立了NCCT胸与e-FAST之间没有区别的事实,NCCT胸是胸部钝性创伤的金标准。结论:e-FAST是钝性胸外伤患者较好的辅助诊断和治疗手段。引用本文:Devadoss H, Sharma P, Nair VV, Rehsi SS, Roy N, Rao PP. e-FAST在三级医疗中心110例稳定型钝器胸外伤诊断中的准确性分析。中华检验医学杂志;2009;25(10):1177 -1172。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书