Outcome Comparison of Different Reconstructive Approaches for Axillary Defects Secondary to Radical Excision of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-27 DOI:10.1159/000521573
Vlad Tereshenko, Riccardo Schweizer, Matthias Waldner, Bong-Sung Kim, Pietro Giovanoli, Holger Jan Klein
{"title":"Outcome Comparison of Different Reconstructive Approaches for Axillary Defects Secondary to Radical Excision of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.","authors":"Vlad Tereshenko,&nbsp;Riccardo Schweizer,&nbsp;Matthias Waldner,&nbsp;Bong-Sung Kim,&nbsp;Pietro Giovanoli,&nbsp;Holger Jan Klein","doi":"10.1159/000521573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical excision of debilitating hidradenitis suppurativa lesions is the only curative approach in the advanced stages of the disease. Different concepts for axillary reconstruction do exist, but data on their clinical outcome are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of two reconstructive methods (posterior arm flap vs. vacuum-assisted closure [VAC] + split-thickness skin graft [STSG]) for axillary defects in patients with severe axillary hidradenitis suppurativa treated at the University Hospital Zurich between 2005 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients (mean age 36 ± 10 years, mean BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m2, Hurley stage II-III) with 67 operated axillae were stratified according to their type of reconstruction. Median operation time in the flap group was 144 min (IQR 114-207) (cumulative 181 min [IQR 124-300]) and 50 min (IQR 40-81) in the VAC + STSG group (cumulative 151 min [IQR 94-194], p < 0.01; p = 0.20 [cumulative time]). The cumulative length of stay was 6 ± 3 days in the flap group and 14 ± 7 days in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Time to complete wound healing was 27 days (IQR 20-49) in the flap group and 62 days (IQR 41-75) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Vancouver Scar Scale score was 6 (IQR 4-9) in the flap group and 11 (IQR 9-12) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Protective sensory recovery was most satisfactory in the flap group (p < 0.01). Forty-four percent of patients of the VAC + STSG group demonstrated functional impairment of arm abduction. Time to return to work was less in group A with 42 days (IQR 27-57) needed as compared to group B with 48 days (IQR 34-55) needed (p = 0.32). The average cost saving was 25% higher for the flap group than for the VAC + STSG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite an increased operation time, axillary reconstruction by the posterior arm flap yields a reduced length of stay, less time to complete wound healing along with restoration of a protective sensibility, and less axillary scarring avoiding functional deficits - eventually allowing earlier return to work.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"851-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501727/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Radical excision of debilitating hidradenitis suppurativa lesions is the only curative approach in the advanced stages of the disease. Different concepts for axillary reconstruction do exist, but data on their clinical outcome are scarce.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of two reconstructive methods (posterior arm flap vs. vacuum-assisted closure [VAC] + split-thickness skin graft [STSG]) for axillary defects in patients with severe axillary hidradenitis suppurativa treated at the University Hospital Zurich between 2005 and 2020.

Results: A total of 35 patients (mean age 36 ± 10 years, mean BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m2, Hurley stage II-III) with 67 operated axillae were stratified according to their type of reconstruction. Median operation time in the flap group was 144 min (IQR 114-207) (cumulative 181 min [IQR 124-300]) and 50 min (IQR 40-81) in the VAC + STSG group (cumulative 151 min [IQR 94-194], p < 0.01; p = 0.20 [cumulative time]). The cumulative length of stay was 6 ± 3 days in the flap group and 14 ± 7 days in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Time to complete wound healing was 27 days (IQR 20-49) in the flap group and 62 days (IQR 41-75) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Vancouver Scar Scale score was 6 (IQR 4-9) in the flap group and 11 (IQR 9-12) in the VAC + STSG group (p < 0.01). Protective sensory recovery was most satisfactory in the flap group (p < 0.01). Forty-four percent of patients of the VAC + STSG group demonstrated functional impairment of arm abduction. Time to return to work was less in group A with 42 days (IQR 27-57) needed as compared to group B with 48 days (IQR 34-55) needed (p = 0.32). The average cost saving was 25% higher for the flap group than for the VAC + STSG group.

Conclusion: Despite an increased operation time, axillary reconstruction by the posterior arm flap yields a reduced length of stay, less time to complete wound healing along with restoration of a protective sensibility, and less axillary scarring avoiding functional deficits - eventually allowing earlier return to work.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

化脓性汗腺炎根治术后腋窝缺损不同重建入路的疗效比较。
背景:对退行性化脓性汗腺炎进行根治性切除是该疾病晚期的唯一治疗方法。腋窝重建的概念不同,但临床结果的资料很少。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对2005年至2020年在苏黎世大学医院治疗的严重腋窝化脓性汗腺炎患者腋窝缺损的两种重建方法(后臂皮瓣与真空辅助闭合[VAC] +裂厚皮肤移植[STSG])进行了回顾性队列研究。结果:35例患者(平均年龄36±10岁,平均BMI 29±5 kg/m2, Hurley分期II-III期)67个腋部按重建类型进行分层。皮瓣组中位手术时间144 min (IQR 114 ~ 207)(累计181 min [IQR 124 ~ 300]), VAC + STSG组中位手术时间50 min (IQR 40 ~ 81)(累计151 min [IQR 94 ~ 194]), p < 0.01;P = 0.20[累积时间])。皮瓣组和VAC + STSG组的累计住院时间分别为(6±3)d和(14±7)d (p < 0.01)。皮瓣组创面愈合时间为27 d (IQR 20 ~ 49), VAC + STSG组创面愈合时间为62 d (IQR 41 ~ 75) (p < 0.01)。皮瓣组温哥华疤痕评分为6分(IQR 4 ~ 9分),VAC + STSG组为11分(IQR 9 ~ 12分),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。皮瓣组保护感觉恢复最满意(p < 0.01)。VAC + STSG组44%的患者表现出手臂外展的功能障碍。A组需要42天(IQR 27-57),而B组需要48天(IQR 34-55),返回工作岗位的时间更短(p = 0.32)。皮瓣组比VAC + STSG组平均节省的费用高25%。结论:尽管手术时间增加,但采用后臂皮瓣重建腋窝可以缩短住院时间,减少伤口愈合时间,恢复保护敏感性,减少腋窝瘢痕,避免功能缺陷,最终允许更早地重返工作岗位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信