Prostate weight and prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH cohort study.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1002/pros.24283
Sean Kennedy Barlow, Taofik Oyekunle, Jessica L Janes, Amanda M De Hoedt, William J Aronson, Christopher J Kane, Christopher L Amling, Matthew R Cooperberg, Zachary W Klaassen, Martha K Terris, Stephen J Freedland, Ilona Csizmadi
{"title":"Prostate weight and prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH cohort study.","authors":"Sean Kennedy Barlow,&nbsp;Taofik Oyekunle,&nbsp;Jessica L Janes,&nbsp;Amanda M De Hoedt,&nbsp;William J Aronson,&nbsp;Christopher J Kane,&nbsp;Christopher L Amling,&nbsp;Matthew R Cooperberg,&nbsp;Zachary W Klaassen,&nbsp;Martha K Terris,&nbsp;Stephen J Freedland,&nbsp;Ilona Csizmadi","doi":"10.1002/pros.24283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smaller prostates have been linked to unfavorable clinical characteristics and poor short-term outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP). We examined the relation between prostate weight at RP and prostate cancer (PC) outcomes post-RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men in the SEARCH cohort undergoing RP between 1988 and 2017 (N = 6242) were studied for PC-specific mortality (PCSM) as the primary outcome, and for biochemical recurrence (BCR), castration-resistant PC (CRPC) and metastasis as secondary outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for associations between prostate weight and outcomes using Fine-Gray competing risk regression multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out following exclusion of: (i) men with extreme prostate weights (<20 g and ≥100 g); and (ii) men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median values for age, pre-RP PSA and prostate weight were 63 years, 6.6 ng/ml, and 42.0 g, respectively. During a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 153 (3%) died from PC, 2103 (34%) had BCR, 203 (3%) developed CRPC, and 289 (5%) developed metastases. Prostate weight was not associated with PCSM in the main analyses (multivariable HR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.87-2.34) or in sensitivity analyses. Prostate weight was inversely associated with BCR in the main analyses (multivariable HR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.61-0.79) which was unchanged in sensitivity analyses. HRs for prostate weight and CRPC and metastasis were elevated but statistical significance was not attained. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inconsistent results for prostate weight and short-term vs longer-term outcomes highlight the need to better understand the complex biology leading to prostate size and the relevance of prostate size as a predictor of PC outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Smaller prostates have been linked to unfavorable clinical characteristics and poor short-term outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP). We examined the relation between prostate weight at RP and prostate cancer (PC) outcomes post-RP.

Methods: Men in the SEARCH cohort undergoing RP between 1988 and 2017 (N = 6242) were studied for PC-specific mortality (PCSM) as the primary outcome, and for biochemical recurrence (BCR), castration-resistant PC (CRPC) and metastasis as secondary outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for associations between prostate weight and outcomes using Fine-Gray competing risk regression multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out following exclusion of: (i) men with extreme prostate weights (<20 g and ≥100 g); and (ii) men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels.

Results: Median values for age, pre-RP PSA and prostate weight were 63 years, 6.6 ng/ml, and 42.0 g, respectively. During a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 153 (3%) died from PC, 2103 (34%) had BCR, 203 (3%) developed CRPC, and 289 (5%) developed metastases. Prostate weight was not associated with PCSM in the main analyses (multivariable HR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.87-2.34) or in sensitivity analyses. Prostate weight was inversely associated with BCR in the main analyses (multivariable HR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.61-0.79) which was unchanged in sensitivity analyses. HRs for prostate weight and CRPC and metastasis were elevated but statistical significance was not attained. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Inconsistent results for prostate weight and short-term vs longer-term outcomes highlight the need to better understand the complex biology leading to prostate size and the relevance of prostate size as a predictor of PC outcomes.

根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺体重和前列腺癌预后:来自SEARCH队列研究的结果。
背景:前列腺小与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后不良的临床特征和短期预后有关。我们研究了RP时前列腺重量与RP后前列腺癌(PC)预后之间的关系。方法:研究1988年至2017年间接受RP的SEARCH队列男性(N = 6242)中,PC特异性死亡率(PCSM)作为主要结局,生化复发(BCR)、去势抵抗性PC (CRPC)和转移作为次要结局。使用Fine-Gray竞争风险回归多变量分析确定前列腺体重与预后之间的关联的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。在排除以下因素后,还进行了敏感性分析:(i)前列腺重量异常的男性(结果:年龄、rp前PSA和前列腺重量的中位数分别为63岁、6.6 ng/ml和42.0 g)。在7.9年的中位随访期间,153例(3%)死于PC, 2103例(34%)死于BCR, 203例(3%)死于CRPC, 289例(5%)死于转移瘤。在主要分析中,前列腺体重与PCSM无关(多变量HR = 1.43;95% CI: 0.87-2.34)或敏感性分析。在主要分析中,前列腺体重与BCR呈负相关(多变量HR = 0.70;95%CI: 0.61-0.79),在敏感性分析中没有变化。前列腺重量、CRPC和转移的hr均升高,但无统计学意义。在敏感性分析中也观察到类似的结果。结论:前列腺重量和短期与长期预后的不一致结果突出了需要更好地理解导致前列腺大小的复杂生物学以及前列腺大小作为前列腺癌预后预测因子的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信