{"title":"An <i>In Vitro</i> Comparative Study of Three Drug-Eluting Beads Loaded with Raltitrexed.","authors":"Enhao Lu, Jun Tie, Lingxiao Liu, Dong Lu, Weifu Lv, Xianyi Sha","doi":"10.1089/cbr.2021.0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study investigated the raltitrexed loading method, compatible stability with contrast agent, release profiles, and morphological properties of CalliSpheres, DC Bead, and HepaSphere. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The amounts of raltitrexed added, loading medium, loading condition, and drug concentrations were investigated as factors influencing drug loading efficiency. Compatible stability with iopamidol was tested. Release profiles were accessed by a flowthrough apparatus system. Morphological properties were evaluated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Diameters were measured by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer. <b><i>Results:</i></b> With the optimized method, the amount of raltitrexed loading to a marketed drug-eluting beads (DEBs) package was 2.67 mg for CalliSpheres, 2.34 mg for DC Bead, and 3.19 mg for HepaSphere. For all three DEBs, the drug leak rate was >50% within 2 h after mixing with iopamidol, and the time to reach 75% of the release plateau was within 10 min. Diameters increased after drug loading. Drug crystals were observed on the surface of DEBs in SEM. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The amount of drug loading could meet clinical requirements by the optimized method. All three raltitrexed-loaded DEBs showed poor compatible stability with iopamidol, as well as rapid drug release performance, which should be noticed in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55277,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2021.0251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the raltitrexed loading method, compatible stability with contrast agent, release profiles, and morphological properties of CalliSpheres, DC Bead, and HepaSphere. Materials and Methods: The amounts of raltitrexed added, loading medium, loading condition, and drug concentrations were investigated as factors influencing drug loading efficiency. Compatible stability with iopamidol was tested. Release profiles were accessed by a flowthrough apparatus system. Morphological properties were evaluated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Diameters were measured by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer. Results: With the optimized method, the amount of raltitrexed loading to a marketed drug-eluting beads (DEBs) package was 2.67 mg for CalliSpheres, 2.34 mg for DC Bead, and 3.19 mg for HepaSphere. For all three DEBs, the drug leak rate was >50% within 2 h after mixing with iopamidol, and the time to reach 75% of the release plateau was within 10 min. Diameters increased after drug loading. Drug crystals were observed on the surface of DEBs in SEM. Conclusions: The amount of drug loading could meet clinical requirements by the optimized method. All three raltitrexed-loaded DEBs showed poor compatible stability with iopamidol, as well as rapid drug release performance, which should be noticed in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals is the established peer-reviewed journal, with over 25 years of cutting-edge content on innovative therapeutic investigations to ultimately improve cancer management. It is the only journal with the specific focus of cancer biotherapy and is inclusive of monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapy, cancer gene therapy, cell-based therapies, and other forms of immunotherapies.
The Journal includes extensive reporting on advancements in radioimmunotherapy, and the use of radiopharmaceuticals and radiolabeled peptides for the development of new cancer treatments.