Evaluation of a Telemedicine Model for Following Keratoconus Patients in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dana Barequet, Shay Gutfreund, Michaella Goldstein, Anat Loewenstein, Ronni Gamzu, David Varssano
{"title":"Evaluation of a Telemedicine Model for Following Keratoconus Patients in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Dana Barequet,&nbsp;Shay Gutfreund,&nbsp;Michaella Goldstein,&nbsp;Anat Loewenstein,&nbsp;Ronni Gamzu,&nbsp;David Varssano","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of a telemedicine approach for detecting keratoconus patients' progression in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective study, comparing the office and telemedicine evaluations in determining whether keratoconus patients were at risk of progression and indicated for further treatment of corneal crosslinking, was conducted. The clinic examination included best spectacle corrected visual acuity measurement and manifest refraction, full ophthalmic examination, and corneal topography, which provided with the gold-standard diagnosis. The remote assessment included two decisions of keratoconus progression or stability: the first evaluation after revealing patient demographics and topography images, and the second with the manifest refraction and clinical findings as documented in the outpatient clinic visit. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two-hundred and four eyes of 102 keratoconus patients were included. There was an agreement of assessment between the in-person and the remote diagnostic decisions in 192 (94%) of the eyes. Among the remaining 12 eyes, a false-positive diagnosis was made in 8 (3.9%) eyes, whereas a false-negative diagnosis was made in 4 (1.9%) eyes. The remote assessment showed a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 96%, respectively. In no case was remote diagnostic decision 2 different from remote decision 1. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The telemedicine model yielded high specificity, but low sensitivity values, therefore, not suitable as an alternative for keratoconus patient follow-up (Clinical trial number TLV-0363-20).</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1023-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of a telemedicine approach for detecting keratoconus patients' progression in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study, comparing the office and telemedicine evaluations in determining whether keratoconus patients were at risk of progression and indicated for further treatment of corneal crosslinking, was conducted. The clinic examination included best spectacle corrected visual acuity measurement and manifest refraction, full ophthalmic examination, and corneal topography, which provided with the gold-standard diagnosis. The remote assessment included two decisions of keratoconus progression or stability: the first evaluation after revealing patient demographics and topography images, and the second with the manifest refraction and clinical findings as documented in the outpatient clinic visit. Results: Two-hundred and four eyes of 102 keratoconus patients were included. There was an agreement of assessment between the in-person and the remote diagnostic decisions in 192 (94%) of the eyes. Among the remaining 12 eyes, a false-positive diagnosis was made in 8 (3.9%) eyes, whereas a false-negative diagnosis was made in 4 (1.9%) eyes. The remote assessment showed a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 96%, respectively. In no case was remote diagnostic decision 2 different from remote decision 1. Conclusions: The telemedicine model yielded high specificity, but low sensitivity values, therefore, not suitable as an alternative for keratoconus patient follow-up (Clinical trial number TLV-0363-20).

新型冠状病毒病疫情下圆锥角膜患者随访远程医疗模式评价
目的:评价新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时期远程医疗检测圆锥角膜患者进展的诊断准确性和可靠性。材料和方法:进行回顾性研究,比较办公室和远程医疗评估,以确定圆锥角膜患者是否有进展风险,是否需要进一步治疗角膜交联。临床检查包括最佳眼镜矫正视力测量和明显屈光,全眼检查和角膜地形图,提供金标准诊断。远程评估包括圆锥角膜进展或稳定性的两项决定:第一次评估是在揭示患者人口统计学和地形图像后进行的,第二次评估是根据门诊就诊记录的明显屈光和临床表现进行的。结果:纳入102例圆锥角膜患者的224只眼。在192只(94%)眼睛的现场诊断和远程诊断之间的评估是一致的。在其余12只眼中,假阳性诊断8只(3.9%)眼,假阴性诊断4只(1.9%)眼。远程评估的敏感性和特异性分别为69%和96%。在任何情况下,远程诊断决策2都与远程决策1不同。结论:远程医疗模型特异性高,敏感性低,不适合作为圆锥角膜患者随访的替代方法(临床试验号TLV-0363-20)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信