This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White.

IF 1.1 4区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1353/ken.2021.0029

Eric Winsberg, Jason Brennan, Chris Surprenant

引用次数: 4

Abstract

We reply to van Basshuysen and White's criticism of our paper. We argue that they have misconstrued what our original claims were. Nevertheless, we maintain that their arguments against the position they incorrectly attribute to us fail.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论文攻击稻草人，但稻草人赢了:对范·巴什森和怀特的回应。

我们对van Basshuysen和White对我们论文的批评作出回应。我们认为他们误解了我们最初的主张。尽管如此，我们认为他们反对他们错误地归咎于我们的立场的论点是失败的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal offers a scholarly forum for diverse views on major issues in bioethics, such as analysis and critique of principlism, feminist perspectives in bioethics, the work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, active euthanasia, genetics, health care reform, and organ transplantation. Each issue includes "Scope Notes," an overview and extensive annotated bibliography on a specific topic in bioethics, and "Bioethics Inside the Beltway," a report written by a Washington insider updating bioethics activities on the federal level.