Ergonomic risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in bank staff: an interventional follow-up study in Iran.

Q1 Nursing
Majid Motamedzadeh, Mahdi Jalali, Rostam Golmohammadi, Javad Faradmal, Hamid Reza Zakeri, Iman Nasiri
{"title":"Ergonomic risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in bank staff: an interventional follow-up study in Iran.","authors":"Majid Motamedzadeh,&nbsp;Mahdi Jalali,&nbsp;Rostam Golmohammadi,&nbsp;Javad Faradmal,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Zakeri,&nbsp;Iman Nasiri","doi":"10.1186/s42506-021-00097-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term use of computer in a static mode may cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in bank staff. Considering the high number of bank employees in different countries, such as Iran, the risk factors of these disorders should be investigated in order to implement interventions required to reduce the risk factors. This study aimed to examine the risk factors of MSDs using the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) method and to perform an ergonomic intervention program with banking staff in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interventional study was conducted on 277 bank employees in Iran. Subjects were randomly divided into three groups, including a control group (without any intervention), an educational intervention (EI) group, and a group receiving both educational and physical intervention (EPI). Before and after the intervention, the ROSA method and Nordic questionnaire were used to assess the risk factors of MSDs in office jobs and to investigate the prevalence of MSDs. Data were collected 2 weeks before and 9 months following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the intervention, the mean score of ROSA at workstations of all groups was above five with high risk. Nine months after the start of the intervention, there was a significant decrease in the mean ROSA score and its components in the two groups that received the intervention, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The results of the study of the prevalence of MSDs in the employees-before the intervention-indicate that the highest prevalence of MSDs in the control group was in areas of the neck (67.1%), back (64.4%), and lower back (63%). In the EI group, the highest prevalence of MSDs was in the neck (65.2%), lower back (61.6%), and back (60.7%) areas. In the EPI group, the discomfort areas were the neck (68.5%), shoulders (66.3%), and lower back (60.9%). Nine months after the intervention, there was a significant decrease in the prevalence of MSDs in the neck, shoulders, and lumbar regions of staff who received the intervention (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nine months after performing the interventions, there was a relative improvement in workstations and prevalence of MSDs in various areas within the bodies of the bank staff. This study showed that using the ROSA method is appropriate for assessing the risk factors of office work and that it can identify deficiencies in workstations. These defects can be addressed by designing and implementing an EI program together with physical interventions according to the components of the ROSA method.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"96 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665913/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-021-00097-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Long-term use of computer in a static mode may cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in bank staff. Considering the high number of bank employees in different countries, such as Iran, the risk factors of these disorders should be investigated in order to implement interventions required to reduce the risk factors. This study aimed to examine the risk factors of MSDs using the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) method and to perform an ergonomic intervention program with banking staff in Iran.

Methods: This interventional study was conducted on 277 bank employees in Iran. Subjects were randomly divided into three groups, including a control group (without any intervention), an educational intervention (EI) group, and a group receiving both educational and physical intervention (EPI). Before and after the intervention, the ROSA method and Nordic questionnaire were used to assess the risk factors of MSDs in office jobs and to investigate the prevalence of MSDs. Data were collected 2 weeks before and 9 months following the intervention.

Results: Before the intervention, the mean score of ROSA at workstations of all groups was above five with high risk. Nine months after the start of the intervention, there was a significant decrease in the mean ROSA score and its components in the two groups that received the intervention, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The results of the study of the prevalence of MSDs in the employees-before the intervention-indicate that the highest prevalence of MSDs in the control group was in areas of the neck (67.1%), back (64.4%), and lower back (63%). In the EI group, the highest prevalence of MSDs was in the neck (65.2%), lower back (61.6%), and back (60.7%) areas. In the EPI group, the discomfort areas were the neck (68.5%), shoulders (66.3%), and lower back (60.9%). Nine months after the intervention, there was a significant decrease in the prevalence of MSDs in the neck, shoulders, and lumbar regions of staff who received the intervention (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Nine months after performing the interventions, there was a relative improvement in workstations and prevalence of MSDs in various areas within the bodies of the bank staff. This study showed that using the ROSA method is appropriate for assessing the risk factors of office work and that it can identify deficiencies in workstations. These defects can be addressed by designing and implementing an EI program together with physical interventions according to the components of the ROSA method.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

银行工作人员的人体工程学危险因素和肌肉骨骼疾病:伊朗的一项干预性随访研究。
背景:长期在静态模式下使用计算机可能会导致银行工作人员的肌肉骨骼疾病。考虑到不同国家(如伊朗)的银行员工人数众多,应调查这些疾病的风险因素,以便实施减少风险因素所需的干预措施。本研究旨在使用快速办公室应变评估(ROSA)方法检查MSDs的危险因素,并对伊朗的银行工作人员进行人体工程学干预计划。方法:对277名伊朗银行从业人员进行干预研究。研究对象随机分为三组,包括对照组(不进行干预)、教育干预组(EI)和教育与身体干预相结合组(EPI)。干预前后分别采用ROSA法和Nordic问卷法评估办公室工作中MSDs的危险因素,调查MSDs的患病率。数据收集于干预前2周和干预后9个月。结果:干预前,各组工作站ROSA平均得分均在5分以上,属于高危。干预开始9个月后,两组患者的平均ROSA评分及其成分均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。干预前员工MSDs患病率的研究结果显示,对照组中MSDs患病率最高的部位是颈部(67.1%)、背部(64.4%)和下背部(63%)。在EI组中,MSDs患病率最高的是颈部(65.2%)、下背部(61.6%)和背部(60.7%)。EPI组不适部位依次为颈部(68.5%)、肩部(66.3%)、下背部(60.9%)。干预9个月后,接受干预的员工颈、肩、腰椎MSDs患病率显著降低(P < 0.05)。结论:实施干预9个月后,银行员工体内各区域的工作站和msd患病率均有相对改善。本研究表明,使用ROSA方法评估办公室工作的危险因素是合适的,它可以识别工作站的不足。这些缺陷可以通过根据ROSA方法的组成部分设计和实施EI程序以及物理干预来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信