{"title":"Surveying over 100 predictors of intrinsic disorder in proteins.","authors":"Bi Zhao, Lukasz Kurgan","doi":"10.1080/14789450.2021.2018304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrinsic disorder prediction field develops, assesses, and deploys computational predictors of disorder in protein sequences and constructs and disseminates databases of these predictions. Over 40 years of research resulted in the release of numerous resources.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We identify and briefly summarize the most comprehensive to date collection of over 100 disorder predictors. We focus on their predictive models, availability and predictive performance. We categorize and study them from a historical point of view to highlight informative trends.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We find a consistent trend of improvements in predictive quality as newer and more advanced predictors are developed. The original focus on machine learning methods has shifted to meta-predictors in early 2010s, followed by a recent transition to deep learning. The use of deep learners will continue in foreseeable future given recent and convincing success of these methods. Moreover, a broad range of resources that facilitate convenient collection of accurate disorder predictions is available to users. They include web servers and standalone programs for disorder prediction, servers that combine prediction of disorder and disorder functions, and large databases of pre-computed predictions. We also point to the need to address the shortage of accurate methods that predict disordered binding regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50463,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2021.2018304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Introduction: Intrinsic disorder prediction field develops, assesses, and deploys computational predictors of disorder in protein sequences and constructs and disseminates databases of these predictions. Over 40 years of research resulted in the release of numerous resources.
Areas covered: We identify and briefly summarize the most comprehensive to date collection of over 100 disorder predictors. We focus on their predictive models, availability and predictive performance. We categorize and study them from a historical point of view to highlight informative trends.
Expert opinion: We find a consistent trend of improvements in predictive quality as newer and more advanced predictors are developed. The original focus on machine learning methods has shifted to meta-predictors in early 2010s, followed by a recent transition to deep learning. The use of deep learners will continue in foreseeable future given recent and convincing success of these methods. Moreover, a broad range of resources that facilitate convenient collection of accurate disorder predictions is available to users. They include web servers and standalone programs for disorder prediction, servers that combine prediction of disorder and disorder functions, and large databases of pre-computed predictions. We also point to the need to address the shortage of accurate methods that predict disordered binding regions.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Proteomics (ISSN 1478-9450) seeks to collect together technologies, methods and discoveries from the field of proteomics to advance scientific understanding of the many varied roles protein expression plays in human health and disease.
The journal coverage includes, but is not limited to, overviews of specific technological advances in the development of protein arrays, interaction maps, data archives and biological assays, performance of new technologies and prospects for future drug discovery.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies and a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale
Article highlights - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points.