Clinical Performance of a Standardized Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Interferon-γ Release Assay for Simple Detection of T-Cell Responses After Infection or Vaccination.

Marta Fernández-González, Vanesa Agulló, Sergio Padilla, José Alberto García, Javier García-Abellán, Ángela Botella, Paula Mascarell, Montserrat Ruiz-García, Mar Masiá, Félix Gutiérrez
{"title":"Clinical Performance of a Standardized Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Interferon-γ Release Assay for Simple Detection of T-Cell Responses After Infection or Vaccination.","authors":"Marta Fernández-González,&nbsp;Vanesa Agulló,&nbsp;Sergio Padilla,&nbsp;José Alberto García,&nbsp;Javier García-Abellán,&nbsp;Ángela Botella,&nbsp;Paula Mascarell,&nbsp;Montserrat Ruiz-García,&nbsp;Mar Masiá,&nbsp;Félix Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated a standardized interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) for detection of T-cell immune response after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with different severity of illness and follow-up (FU), vaccinated subjects, and healthy unvaccinated persons. SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was measured using a specific quantitative IGRA in whole blood (Euroimmun, Germany) and TrimericS-IgG and neutralizing antibodies with validated serological platforms. Positivity of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or vaccination was considered as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 239 individuals were included (152 convalescent, 54 vaccinated, and 33 uninfected unvaccinated). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values (95% confidence interval) of the IGRA were 81.1% (74.9-86%), 90.9% (74.5-97.6%), 98.2% (94.5-99.5%), and 43.5% (31.8-55.9%), respectively. All vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naive subjects had positive IGRA at 3 months. In convalescent subjects the magnitude of IFN-γ responses and IGRA accuracy varied according to disease severity and duration of FU, with the best performance in patients with severe COVID-19 at 3 months and the worst in those with mild disease at 12 months. The greatest contribution of IGRA to serological tests was observed in patients with mild disease and long-term FU (incremental difference, 30.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IGRA was a reliable method of quantifying T-cell response after SARS-COV-2 infection or vaccination. In convalescent patients, the sensitivity is largely dependent on disease severity and time since primary infection. The assay is more likely to add clinical value to serology in patients with mild infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e338-e346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689778/pdf/ciab1021.pdf","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: We evaluated a standardized interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) for detection of T-cell immune response after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination.

Methods: This prospective study included patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with different severity of illness and follow-up (FU), vaccinated subjects, and healthy unvaccinated persons. SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was measured using a specific quantitative IGRA in whole blood (Euroimmun, Germany) and TrimericS-IgG and neutralizing antibodies with validated serological platforms. Positivity of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or vaccination was considered as the reference standard.

Results: A total of 239 individuals were included (152 convalescent, 54 vaccinated, and 33 uninfected unvaccinated). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values (95% confidence interval) of the IGRA were 81.1% (74.9-86%), 90.9% (74.5-97.6%), 98.2% (94.5-99.5%), and 43.5% (31.8-55.9%), respectively. All vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naive subjects had positive IGRA at 3 months. In convalescent subjects the magnitude of IFN-γ responses and IGRA accuracy varied according to disease severity and duration of FU, with the best performance in patients with severe COVID-19 at 3 months and the worst in those with mild disease at 12 months. The greatest contribution of IGRA to serological tests was observed in patients with mild disease and long-term FU (incremental difference, 30.4%).

Conclusions: The IGRA was a reliable method of quantifying T-cell response after SARS-COV-2 infection or vaccination. In convalescent patients, the sensitivity is largely dependent on disease severity and time since primary infection. The assay is more likely to add clinical value to serology in patients with mild infections.

标准化严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)干扰素γ释放法检测感染或接种后t细胞反应的临床表现
背景:我们评估了一种标准化的干扰素-γ (IFN-γ)释放试验(IGRA),用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染或接种后的t细胞免疫反应。方法:本前瞻性研究包括不同病情严重程度的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者、接种疫苗者和未接种疫苗的健康人群。使用全血特异性定量IGRA (euroimmune,德国)和经过验证的血清学平台的TrimericS-IgG和中和抗体来测量SARS-CoV-2 t细胞反应。以逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性或接种疫苗为参考标准。结果:共纳入239人(恢复期152人,接种疫苗54人,未接种疫苗33人)。IGRA的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(95%置信区间)分别为81.1%(74.9 ~ 86%)、90.9%(74.5 ~ 97.6%)、98.2%(94.5 ~ 99.5%)和43.5%(31.8 ~ 55.9%)。所有未接种sars - cov -2疫苗的受试者在3个月时IGRA均呈阳性。在恢复期受试者中,IFN-γ反应的大小和IGRA准确性根据疾病严重程度和FU持续时间而变化,重症COVID-19患者在3个月时表现最佳,轻度疾病患者在12个月时表现最差。IGRA对血清学测试的贡献最大的是在轻度疾病和长期FU患者中(增量差异为30.4%)。结论:IGRA是一种可靠的定量SARS-COV-2感染或接种后t细胞反应的方法。在恢复期患者中,敏感性很大程度上取决于疾病严重程度和初次感染后的时间。该检测更有可能为轻度感染患者的血清学增加临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书