Reduced Effective Oxygen Delivery and Ventilation with a Surgical Facemask Placed under Compared to over an Oxygen Mask: A Comparative Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4798993
Marvin G Chang, Takashi Sakano, Benjamin S Levin, David Convissar, Edward A Bittner
{"title":"Reduced Effective Oxygen Delivery and Ventilation with a Surgical Facemask Placed under Compared to over an Oxygen Mask: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Marvin G Chang,&nbsp;Takashi Sakano,&nbsp;Benjamin S Levin,&nbsp;David Convissar,&nbsp;Edward A Bittner","doi":"10.1155/2022/4798993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Consensus guidelines for perioperative anesthesia management during the COVID-19 pandemic recommend that patients wear a facemask in addition to their oxygen mask or nasal cannulae following tracheal extubation, where this is practical. The effects on effective oxygen delivery and ventilation of a surgical facemask under compared to over an oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) mask are unclear.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, comparative pilot study. <i>Setting</i>. Endoscopy procedure room at a major academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Five healthy anesthesiologists. <i>Interventions</i>. Using a carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) sampling line positioned at the lips, the fraction of inspired O<sub>2</sub> (FiO<sub>2</sub>), fraction of expiratory O<sub>2</sub> (FeO<sub>2</sub>), expiratory end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), and respiratory rate (RR) were measured under the following conditions: (1) a surgical facemask only, (2) a surgical facemask under an O<sub>2</sub> mask, (3) an O<sub>2</sub> mask only, and (4) a surgical facemask over an O<sub>2</sub> mask. <i>Measurements and Main Results</i>. The sampled fractional expired oxygen (FeO<sub>2</sub>) at the lips was significantly lower when the surgical facemask was under compared to when over the O<sub>2</sub> mask (27.9± 1.68 vs. 49.9 ± 6.27, <i>p</i> = 0.001), while there was no significant difference in inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>). The sampled expiratory EtCO<sub>2</sub> was significantly higher when the surgical facemask was under the O<sub>2</sub> mask compared to when over the O<sub>2</sub> mask (28.3 ± 8.5 vs. 23.5 ± 7.6, <i>p</i> = 0.026). The RR was not significantly different when the surgical facemask was under compared to over the O<sub>2</sub> mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective oxygen delivery and ventilation was reduced (lower FeO<sub>2</sub> and increased EtCO<sub>2</sub>) when a surgical facemask was placed under compared to over an O<sub>2</sub> mask.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"4798993"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4798993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Consensus guidelines for perioperative anesthesia management during the COVID-19 pandemic recommend that patients wear a facemask in addition to their oxygen mask or nasal cannulae following tracheal extubation, where this is practical. The effects on effective oxygen delivery and ventilation of a surgical facemask under compared to over an oxygen (O2) mask are unclear.

Design: Single-center, comparative pilot study. Setting. Endoscopy procedure room at a major academic hospital.

Subjects: Five healthy anesthesiologists. Interventions. Using a carbon dioxide (CO2) sampling line positioned at the lips, the fraction of inspired O2 (FiO2), fraction of expiratory O2 (FeO2), expiratory end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), and respiratory rate (RR) were measured under the following conditions: (1) a surgical facemask only, (2) a surgical facemask under an O2 mask, (3) an O2 mask only, and (4) a surgical facemask over an O2 mask. Measurements and Main Results. The sampled fractional expired oxygen (FeO2) at the lips was significantly lower when the surgical facemask was under compared to when over the O2 mask (27.9± 1.68 vs. 49.9 ± 6.27, p = 0.001), while there was no significant difference in inspired oxygen (FiO2). The sampled expiratory EtCO2 was significantly higher when the surgical facemask was under the O2 mask compared to when over the O2 mask (28.3 ± 8.5 vs. 23.5 ± 7.6, p = 0.026). The RR was not significantly different when the surgical facemask was under compared to over the O2 mask.

Conclusions: Effective oxygen delivery and ventilation was reduced (lower FeO2 and increased EtCO2) when a surgical facemask was placed under compared to over an O2 mask.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外科手术面罩下与面罩上的有效供氧和通气减少:一项比较研究。
目的:COVID-19大流行期间围手术期麻醉管理的共识指南建议,在可行的情况下,患者在气管拔管后除了佩戴氧气罩或鼻插管外,还应佩戴口罩。与氧气(O2)面罩相比,外科口罩对有效氧气输送和通气的影响尚不清楚。设计:单中心、比较试点研究。设置。一家大型学术医院的内窥镜检查室。受试者:5名健康的麻醉师。干预措施。使用位于嘴唇处的二氧化碳(CO2)采样线,在以下条件下测量吸入O2 (FiO2)分数,呼气O2 (FeO2)分数,呼气末CO2 (EtCO2)和呼吸速率(RR):(1)仅使用外科口罩,(2)外科口罩下使用O2面罩,(3)仅使用O2面罩,(4)外科口罩上使用O2面罩。测量和主要结果。唇部缺氧分数(FeO2)在手术面罩下明显低于面罩上(27.9±1.68∶49.9±6.27,p = 0.001),而吸入氧分数(FiO2)在手术面罩下无显著差异。面罩下呼气EtCO2明显高于面罩上呼气EtCO2(28.3±8.5 vs. 23.5±7.6,p = 0.026)。手术面罩下与氧气面罩上的RR无显著差异。结论:与戴上氧气面罩相比,戴下外科口罩降低了有效的氧气输送和通气(FeO2降低,EtCO2增加)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信