A protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of thigmotactic behaviour in the open field test in rodent models associated with persistent pain.

Q1 Medicine
BMJ Open Science Pub Date : 2021-01-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjos-2020-100135
Xue Ying Zhang, Jan Vollert, Emily S Sena, Andrew Sc Rice, Nadia Soliman
{"title":"A protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of thigmotactic behaviour in the open field test in rodent models associated with persistent pain.","authors":"Xue Ying Zhang,&nbsp;Jan Vollert,&nbsp;Emily S Sena,&nbsp;Andrew Sc Rice,&nbsp;Nadia Soliman","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2020-100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thigmotaxis is an innate predator avoidance behaviour of rodents and is enhanced when animals are under stress. It is characterised by the preference of a rodent to seek shelter, rather than expose itself to the aversive open area. The behaviour has been proposed to be a measurable construct that can address the impact of pain on rodent behaviour. This systematic review will assess whether thigmotaxis can be influenced by experimental persistent pain and attenuated by pharmacological interventions in rodents.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We will conduct search on three electronic databases to identify studies in which thigmotaxis was used as an outcome measure contextualised to a rodent model associated with persistent pain. All studies published until the date of the search will be considered.</p><p><strong>Screening and annotation: </strong>Two independent reviewers will screen studies based on the order of (1) titles and abstracts, and (2) full texts.</p><p><strong>Data management and reporting: </strong>For meta-analysis, we will extract thigmotactic behavioural data and calculate effect sizes. Effect sizes will be combined using a random-effects model. We will assess heterogeneity and identify sources of heterogeneity. A risk-of-bias assessment will be conducted to evaluate study quality. Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots, Egger's regression and trim-and-fill analysis. We will also extract stimulus-evoked limb withdrawal data to assess its correlation with thigmotaxis in the same animals. The evidence obtained will provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of using thigmotactic outcome measure in animal pain research so that future experimental designs can be optimised. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and disseminate the review findings through publication and conference presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":" ","pages":"e100135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100135","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Thigmotaxis is an innate predator avoidance behaviour of rodents and is enhanced when animals are under stress. It is characterised by the preference of a rodent to seek shelter, rather than expose itself to the aversive open area. The behaviour has been proposed to be a measurable construct that can address the impact of pain on rodent behaviour. This systematic review will assess whether thigmotaxis can be influenced by experimental persistent pain and attenuated by pharmacological interventions in rodents.

Search strategy: We will conduct search on three electronic databases to identify studies in which thigmotaxis was used as an outcome measure contextualised to a rodent model associated with persistent pain. All studies published until the date of the search will be considered.

Screening and annotation: Two independent reviewers will screen studies based on the order of (1) titles and abstracts, and (2) full texts.

Data management and reporting: For meta-analysis, we will extract thigmotactic behavioural data and calculate effect sizes. Effect sizes will be combined using a random-effects model. We will assess heterogeneity and identify sources of heterogeneity. A risk-of-bias assessment will be conducted to evaluate study quality. Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots, Egger's regression and trim-and-fill analysis. We will also extract stimulus-evoked limb withdrawal data to assess its correlation with thigmotaxis in the same animals. The evidence obtained will provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of using thigmotactic outcome measure in animal pain research so that future experimental designs can be optimised. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and disseminate the review findings through publication and conference presentation.

在与持续性疼痛相关的啮齿类动物模型的野外试验中,对移动性行为进行系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案。
目的:趋动性是啮齿类动物一种天生的躲避捕食者的行为,当动物处于应激状态时,趋动性会增强。它的特点是啮齿动物倾向于寻求庇护,而不是暴露在令人厌恶的开放区域。这种行为被认为是一种可测量的结构,可以解决疼痛对啮齿动物行为的影响。本系统综述将评估实验性持续性疼痛是否会影响鼠的吸血性,并通过药物干预来减弱。搜索策略:我们将在三个电子数据库中进行搜索,以确定在与持续疼痛相关的啮齿动物模型中,将移动性用作结果测量的研究。在检索日期之前发表的所有研究将被考虑。筛选和注释:两名独立审稿人将根据(1)标题和摘要以及(2)全文的顺序筛选研究。数据管理和报告:在荟萃分析中,我们将提取策略行为数据并计算效应量。效应大小将使用随机效应模型进行组合。我们将评估异质性并确定异质性的来源。将进行风险偏倚评估以评估研究质量。发表偏倚将使用漏斗图、艾格回归和补齐分析进行评估。我们还将提取刺激诱发的肢体退缩数据,以评估其与相同动物的心脏趋动性的相关性。获得的证据将提供对在动物疼痛研究中使用趋势性结果测量的优势和局限性的全面理解,以便未来的实验设计可以优化。我们将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目,并通过出版物和会议报告传播审查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Science
BMJ Open Science Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信