Reframing Burkitt lymphoma: virology not epidemiology defines clinical variants.

Annals of lymphoma Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-30 DOI:10.21037/aol-21-18
Rosemary Rochford
{"title":"Reframing Burkitt lymphoma: virology not epidemiology defines clinical variants.","authors":"Rosemary Rochford","doi":"10.21037/aol-21-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1964, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was identified in a biopsy from a patient with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) launching a new field of study into this ubiquitous human virus. Almost 60 years later, insights into the role of EBV in lymphomagenesis are still emerging. While all BL carry the hallmark c-myc translocation, the epidemiologic classification of BL (e.g., endemic, sporadic or immunodeficiency-associated) has traditionally been used to define BL clinical variants. However, recent studies using molecular methods to characterize the transcriptional and genetic landscape of BL have identified several unique features are observed that distinguish EBV+ BL including a high level of activation induced deaminase mutation load, evidence of antigen selection in the B cell receptor, and a decreased mutation frequency of TCF3/ID3, all found predominantly in EBV+ compared to EBV- BL. In this review, the focus will be on summarizing recent studies that have done in depth characterization of genetic and transcriptional profiles of BL, describing the differences and similarities of EBV+ and EBV- BL, and what they reveal about the etiology of BL. The new studies put forth a compelling argument that the association with EBV should be the defining etiologic feature of clinical variants of BL. This reframing of BL has important implications for therapeutic interventions for BL that distinguish the EBV+ from the EBV- lymphomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":72224,"journal":{"name":"Annals of lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/cd/nihms-1757463.PMC8654190.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aol-21-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1964, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was identified in a biopsy from a patient with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) launching a new field of study into this ubiquitous human virus. Almost 60 years later, insights into the role of EBV in lymphomagenesis are still emerging. While all BL carry the hallmark c-myc translocation, the epidemiologic classification of BL (e.g., endemic, sporadic or immunodeficiency-associated) has traditionally been used to define BL clinical variants. However, recent studies using molecular methods to characterize the transcriptional and genetic landscape of BL have identified several unique features are observed that distinguish EBV+ BL including a high level of activation induced deaminase mutation load, evidence of antigen selection in the B cell receptor, and a decreased mutation frequency of TCF3/ID3, all found predominantly in EBV+ compared to EBV- BL. In this review, the focus will be on summarizing recent studies that have done in depth characterization of genetic and transcriptional profiles of BL, describing the differences and similarities of EBV+ and EBV- BL, and what they reveal about the etiology of BL. The new studies put forth a compelling argument that the association with EBV should be the defining etiologic feature of clinical variants of BL. This reframing of BL has important implications for therapeutic interventions for BL that distinguish the EBV+ from the EBV- lymphomas.

Abstract Image

重塑伯基特淋巴瘤:病毒学而非流行病学定义临床变异。
1964 年,在一名伯基特淋巴瘤(BL)患者的活组织检查中发现了爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV),从而开启了研究这种无处不在的人类病毒的新领域。近 60 年过去了,人们对 EBV 在淋巴瘤发病中的作用的认识仍在不断深入。虽然所有白淋巴瘤都带有标志性的 c-myc 易位,但白淋巴瘤的流行病学分类(如地方性、散发性或免疫缺陷相关性)历来被用来定义白淋巴瘤的临床变异。然而,最近使用分子方法描述白血病转录和遗传特征的研究发现,EBV+白血病有几个独特的特征,包括活化诱导脱氨酶突变负荷高、B 细胞受体抗原选择证据以及 TCF3/ID3 突变频率降低,所有这些都是 EBV+ 白血病比 EBV- 白血病主要发现的特征。在这篇综述中,我们将重点总结近期对 BL 的遗传和转录特征进行深入分析的研究,描述 EBV+ BL 和 EBV- BL 的异同,以及这些研究对 BL 病因学的启示。新的研究提出了一个令人信服的论点,即与 EBV 的关联应该是 BL 临床变异的决定性病因学特征。对 BL 的这一重构对区分 EBV+ 和 EBV- 淋巴瘤的 BL 治疗干预具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信