Microneedling in Combination with Topical Pimecrolimus 1% versus Topical Pimecrolimus 1% for the Treatment of Refractory Stable Vitiligo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-11-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5652140
Fariba Iraji, Ali Asilian, Zahra Talebzadeh, Mina Saber, Fatemeh Mokhtari, Amirhossein Siadat, Seyed Mohsen Hosseini
{"title":"Microneedling in Combination with Topical Pimecrolimus 1% versus Topical Pimecrolimus 1% for the Treatment of Refractory Stable Vitiligo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Fariba Iraji,&nbsp;Ali Asilian,&nbsp;Zahra Talebzadeh,&nbsp;Mina Saber,&nbsp;Fatemeh Mokhtari,&nbsp;Amirhossein Siadat,&nbsp;Seyed Mohsen Hosseini","doi":"10.1155/2021/5652140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vitiligo is a common, autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the melanocytes and manifests as depigmented macules on various areas of the skin. Numerous treatment options have been proposed for vitiligo. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus 1% versus the sole use of topical pimecrolimus 1% for the treatment of vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical trial was conducted on 30 skin lesions on 15 Al-Zahra hospital patients. Each patient had two similar lesions in the limb area, and each lesion was considered a separate treatment group. The left or right side of the patient's lesion was randomly assigned to receive microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus for three months, while the other side received only topical pimecrolimus 1%. As part of the follow-up, digital photography was taken at the baseline and biweekly for three months after treatment and six months' follow-up. The following methods were used to evaluate the results: DLQI questionnaires, patient satisfaction questionnaires, and two independent dermatologists comparing the improvement rate for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Topical pimecrolimus 1% treatment led to unsatisfactory results, whereas the combination of microneedling and topical pimecrolimus1% treatment produced a more favorable overall outcome (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established that combination therapy results in more significant patient improvement. Additionally, one patient experienced mild skin irritation as a side effect of topical pimecrolimus.</p>","PeriodicalId":11338,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651420/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5652140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Vitiligo is a common, autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the melanocytes and manifests as depigmented macules on various areas of the skin. Numerous treatment options have been proposed for vitiligo. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus 1% versus the sole use of topical pimecrolimus 1% for the treatment of vitiligo.

Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 30 skin lesions on 15 Al-Zahra hospital patients. Each patient had two similar lesions in the limb area, and each lesion was considered a separate treatment group. The left or right side of the patient's lesion was randomly assigned to receive microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus for three months, while the other side received only topical pimecrolimus 1%. As part of the follow-up, digital photography was taken at the baseline and biweekly for three months after treatment and six months' follow-up. The following methods were used to evaluate the results: DLQI questionnaires, patient satisfaction questionnaires, and two independent dermatologists comparing the improvement rate for each group.

Results: Topical pimecrolimus 1% treatment led to unsatisfactory results, whereas the combination of microneedling and topical pimecrolimus1% treatment produced a more favorable overall outcome (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study established that combination therapy results in more significant patient improvement. Additionally, one patient experienced mild skin irritation as a side effect of topical pimecrolimus.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微针联合1%局部吡美莫司与1%局部吡美莫司治疗难治性稳定型白癜风的随机临床试验
目的:白癜风是一种常见的自身免疫性疾病,导致黑色素细胞的破坏,表现为皮肤各部位的色素沉着斑。针对白癜风已经提出了许多治疗方案。本研究的目的是比较微针加1%局部吡美莫司与单独使用1%局部吡美莫司治疗白癜风的疗效。方法:对Al-Zahra医院15例患者30处皮损进行临床试验。每个患者在肢体区域有两个相似的病变,每个病变被认为是一个单独的治疗组。患者病变左侧或右侧随机分配接受微针加局部吡美莫司治疗3个月,而另一侧只接受1%局部吡美莫司治疗。作为随访的一部分,在治疗后3个月和6个月的随访中,在基线和每两周拍摄一次数码照片。采用以下方法评估结果:DLQI问卷、患者满意度问卷、两名独立皮肤科医生比较两组的治愈率。结果:1%吡美莫司局部治疗的结果不理想,而微针联合1%吡美莫司局部治疗的总体结果更有利(P < 0.001)。结论:本研究证实联合治疗对患者的改善更为显著。此外,一名患者出现轻度皮肤刺激,作为局部吡美莫司的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信