Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions.

IF 2.8
Andreas Stotz, Ebrahem Maghames, Joel Mason, Andreas Groll, Astrid Zech
{"title":"Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions.","authors":"Andreas Stotz,&nbsp;Ebrahem Maghames,&nbsp;Joel Mason,&nbsp;Andreas Groll,&nbsp;Astrid Zech","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00401-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research indicates the high relevance of optimal joint angles for individual isometric strength assessment. The objective was to compare lower limb peak isometric muscle strength abilities at the strongest joint angles with those of dynamic contractions in healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen young male adults performed maximum concentric, isometric, and eccentric contractions of the ankle, knee, and hip flexors and extensors, and hip adductors and abductors in a randomized sequence on an isokinetic dynamometer (ISOMED 2000). Angular velocity was set at 60°/s. The peak of concentric contraction torque curves was used to define optimal joint angles best suited to generate maximum torque during isometric contractions. Maximum voluntary contraction torque of all contraction conditions was adjusted for limb weight and analyzed via a generalized linear mixed gamma regression model (GLMM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gamma GLMM revealed strongly significant effects for all three categorical covariates (contraction types, muscle group, and test order) ([Formula: see text]). Eccentric contraction increases the muscle torque ([Formula: see text]) compared to concentric contraction, and isometric contraction even more ([Formula: see text]). A moderate individual-specific variation was found (random effects standard deviation [Formula: see text]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the importance of optimal joint angles for isometric maximum strength assessment. When such conditions are given, isometric contractions can produce higher muscle torques than eccentric contractions in the lower body.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783437/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00401-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Previous research indicates the high relevance of optimal joint angles for individual isometric strength assessment. The objective was to compare lower limb peak isometric muscle strength abilities at the strongest joint angles with those of dynamic contractions in healthy young adults.

Methods: Eighteen young male adults performed maximum concentric, isometric, and eccentric contractions of the ankle, knee, and hip flexors and extensors, and hip adductors and abductors in a randomized sequence on an isokinetic dynamometer (ISOMED 2000). Angular velocity was set at 60°/s. The peak of concentric contraction torque curves was used to define optimal joint angles best suited to generate maximum torque during isometric contractions. Maximum voluntary contraction torque of all contraction conditions was adjusted for limb weight and analyzed via a generalized linear mixed gamma regression model (GLMM).

Results: The gamma GLMM revealed strongly significant effects for all three categorical covariates (contraction types, muscle group, and test order) ([Formula: see text]). Eccentric contraction increases the muscle torque ([Formula: see text]) compared to concentric contraction, and isometric contraction even more ([Formula: see text]). A moderate individual-specific variation was found (random effects standard deviation [Formula: see text]).

Conclusion: The results support the importance of optimal joint angles for isometric maximum strength assessment. When such conditions are given, isometric contractions can produce higher muscle torques than eccentric contractions in the lower body.

Abstract Image

在单独调整关节角度时的最大等距扭矩超过了下肢关节动作中的偏心和同心扭矩。
背景:先前的研究表明,最佳关节角度与个人等距强度评估高度相关。目的是比较健康的年轻人在最强关节角和动态收缩时的下肢峰值等距肌肉力量能力。方法:18名年轻成年男性在等速测力仪(ISOMED 2000)上按随机顺序进行踝关节、膝关节和髋关节屈肌、伸肌、髋关节内收肌和外展肌的最大同心、等距和偏心收缩。角速度设为60°/s。利用同心收缩力矩曲线的峰值来确定在等距收缩时产生最大力矩的最佳关节角。所有收缩条件下的最大自主收缩扭矩根据肢体体重进行调整,并通过广义线性混合伽马回归模型(GLMM)进行分析。结果:gamma GLMM显示了对所有三个分类协变量(收缩类型、肌肉群和测试顺序)的强烈显著影响(公式:见文本)。与同心收缩相比,偏心收缩增加了肌肉扭矩([公式:见文本]),而等距收缩则更多([公式:见文本])。发现了适度的个体特异性变异(随机效应标准差[公式:见原文])。结论:结果支持最佳关节角在等距最大强度评估中的重要性。当这些条件给定时,等距收缩比下半身偏心收缩产生更高的肌肉扭矩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书