Psychiatric disorders and offending in an Australian birth cohort: Overrepresentation in the health and criminal justice systems for Indigenous Australians.

James M Ogilvie, Troy Allard, Carleen Thompson, Susan Dennison, Simon B Little, Krystal Lockwood, Steve Kisely, Ellie Putland, Anna Stewart
{"title":"Psychiatric disorders and offending in an Australian birth cohort: Overrepresentation in the health and criminal justice systems for Indigenous Australians.","authors":"James M Ogilvie,&nbsp;Troy Allard,&nbsp;Carleen Thompson,&nbsp;Susan Dennison,&nbsp;Simon B Little,&nbsp;Krystal Lockwood,&nbsp;Steve Kisely,&nbsp;Ellie Putland,&nbsp;Anna Stewart","doi":"10.1177/00048674211063814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most studies that examine psychiatric illness in people who offend have focused on incarcerated samples, with little known about the larger population of individuals with criminal justice system contact. We examine the overlap between proven offences and psychiatric diagnoses with an emphasis on experiences for Indigenous Australians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a population-based birth cohort of 45,141 individuals born in Queensland, Australia, in 1990 (6.3% Indigenous), psychiatric diagnoses were identified from hospital admissions between ages 4/5 and 23/24 years and proven offences were identified from court records (spanning ages 10-24 years). Prevalence rates for offending, psychiatric diagnoses and their overlap were examined for Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals. Associations between specific psychiatric diagnoses and types of offending were examined using logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11,134 (24.7%) individuals with a finalised court appearance, 2937 (6.5%) with a diagnosed psychiatric disorder and 1556 (3.4%) with a proven offence and diagnosed psychiatric disorder, with Indigenous Australians significantly overrepresented across all outcomes. Compared with non-Indigenous Australians, Indigenous Australians were younger at their first court finalisation (Cohen's <i>d</i> = -0.62, 95% confidence interval = [-0.67, -0.57]), experienced a higher number of finalisations (<i>d</i> = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = [0.89, 1.00]) and offences (<i>d</i> = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.69]) and were more likely to receive custodial (<i>d</i> = 0.41, 95% confidence interval = [0.36, 0.46]) or supervised (<i>d</i> = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = [0.50, 0.60]) sentences. The overlap between offending and psychiatric illness was more pronounced for Indigenous Australians compared with non-Indigenous Australians (14.8% vs 2.7%). Substance use disorders were the most prevalent psychiatric diagnosis among individuals with a court finalisation (9.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indigenous Australians were significantly overrepresented in court finalisations and psychiatric diagnoses. Indigenous Australians with a psychiatric diagnosis were at highest risk of experiencing a court appearance, emphasising the importance of culturally appropriate mental health responses being embedded into the criminal justice system.</p>","PeriodicalId":117457,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1587-1601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211063814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Most studies that examine psychiatric illness in people who offend have focused on incarcerated samples, with little known about the larger population of individuals with criminal justice system contact. We examine the overlap between proven offences and psychiatric diagnoses with an emphasis on experiences for Indigenous Australians.

Methods: In a population-based birth cohort of 45,141 individuals born in Queensland, Australia, in 1990 (6.3% Indigenous), psychiatric diagnoses were identified from hospital admissions between ages 4/5 and 23/24 years and proven offences were identified from court records (spanning ages 10-24 years). Prevalence rates for offending, psychiatric diagnoses and their overlap were examined for Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals. Associations between specific psychiatric diagnoses and types of offending were examined using logistic regressions.

Results: There were 11,134 (24.7%) individuals with a finalised court appearance, 2937 (6.5%) with a diagnosed psychiatric disorder and 1556 (3.4%) with a proven offence and diagnosed psychiatric disorder, with Indigenous Australians significantly overrepresented across all outcomes. Compared with non-Indigenous Australians, Indigenous Australians were younger at their first court finalisation (Cohen's d = -0.62, 95% confidence interval = [-0.67, -0.57]), experienced a higher number of finalisations (d = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = [0.89, 1.00]) and offences (d = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.69]) and were more likely to receive custodial (d = 0.41, 95% confidence interval = [0.36, 0.46]) or supervised (d = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = [0.50, 0.60]) sentences. The overlap between offending and psychiatric illness was more pronounced for Indigenous Australians compared with non-Indigenous Australians (14.8% vs 2.7%). Substance use disorders were the most prevalent psychiatric diagnosis among individuals with a court finalisation (9.2%).

Conclusions: Indigenous Australians were significantly overrepresented in court finalisations and psychiatric diagnoses. Indigenous Australians with a psychiatric diagnosis were at highest risk of experiencing a court appearance, emphasising the importance of culturally appropriate mental health responses being embedded into the criminal justice system.

澳大利亚出生队列中的精神疾病和犯罪:澳大利亚土著居民健康和刑事司法系统中的过度代表。
目的:大多数研究犯罪人群的精神疾病的研究都集中在被监禁的样本上,很少有人知道与刑事司法系统有联系的更大人群。我们检查了已证实的罪行和精神诊断之间的重叠,重点是土著澳大利亚人的经历。方法:对1990年出生在澳大利亚昆士兰州的45,141人(6.3%为土著居民)进行了以人口为基础的出生队列研究,从4/5岁至23/24岁的住院患者中确定了精神疾病诊断,并从法庭记录中确定了已证实的犯罪行为(跨越10-24岁)。对土著居民和非土著居民的犯罪流行率、精神病诊断及其重叠情况进行了调查。使用逻辑回归检验特定精神病诊断和犯罪类型之间的关联。结果:11134人(24.7%)最终出庭,2937人(6.5%)被诊断为精神障碍,1556人(3.4%)被证实犯罪并被诊断为精神障碍,在所有结果中,土著澳大利亚人的比例明显过高。与非土著澳大利亚人相比,土著澳大利亚人第一次出庭时更年轻(Cohen的d = -0.62, 95%置信区间=[-0.67,-0.57]),经历了更多的最终判决(d = 0.94, 95%置信区间=[0.89,1.00])和犯罪(d = 0.64, 95%置信区间=[0.59,0.69]),更有可能受到监禁(d = 0.41, 95%置信区间=[0.36,0.46])或监督(d = 0.55, 95%置信区间= [0.50,0.60])的句子。与非土著澳大利亚人相比,土著澳大利亚人的犯罪和精神疾病之间的重叠更为明显(14.8%对2.7%)。物质使用障碍是法院判决的个体中最普遍的精神病诊断(9.2%)。结论:澳大利亚土著居民在法庭判决和精神病诊断中比例明显过高。患有精神病诊断的澳大利亚土著居民出庭的风险最高,这强调了将文化上适当的心理健康反应纳入刑事司法系统的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书