Effects of Long-Term Tenofovir and Entecavir Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Resul Kahraman, Abdurrahman Şahin, Oğuzhan Öztürk, Turan Çalhan, Süleyman Sayar, Evren Kanat, Levent Doğanay, Kamil Özdil
{"title":"Effects of Long-Term Tenofovir and Entecavir Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.","authors":"Resul Kahraman,&nbsp;Abdurrahman Şahin,&nbsp;Oğuzhan Öztürk,&nbsp;Turan Çalhan,&nbsp;Süleyman Sayar,&nbsp;Evren Kanat,&nbsp;Levent Doğanay,&nbsp;Kamil Özdil","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2020.18024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate the long-term effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir treatment on bone mineral density and evaluated the fracture risk assessment tool score in patients with chronic hepatitis B.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 58 chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n = 40) and entecavir (n = 18) were included in this prospective study from 2012 to 2016. To evaluate bone mineral density, dual-X-ray absorptiometry, fracture risk assessment tool, and laboratory examinations were performed in all patients first at baseline and second at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, sex, body mass index, fibrosis score, and viral load were similar in both groups. The mean follow-up was 33 months in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group and 31 months in the entecavir group. In patients treated with entecavir, there was no statistically significant difference between baseline and second bone mineral density including lumbar spine (L) and total hip T score. In patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, there was a significant difference in the second bone mineral density compared with baseline bone mineral density for L3 (P = .033) and the major fracture risk assessment tool score (P = .03). When patients were divided into 3 groups (normal bone mineral density, osteopenic, and osteoporotic), there was a significant increase in the number of osteopenic patients in the total hip T score after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment (P = .034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest a decrease in the bone mineral density for lumbar spine (L3), an increase in the number of patients with hip osteopenia, and major fracture risk assessment tool score after long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment in patients with rechronic hepatitis B.</p>","PeriodicalId":518528,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128468/pdf/tjg-33-1-35.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2020.18024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate the long-term effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir treatment on bone mineral density and evaluated the fracture risk assessment tool score in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Methods: A total of 58 chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n = 40) and entecavir (n = 18) were included in this prospective study from 2012 to 2016. To evaluate bone mineral density, dual-X-ray absorptiometry, fracture risk assessment tool, and laboratory examinations were performed in all patients first at baseline and second at the end of the study.

Results: Age, sex, body mass index, fibrosis score, and viral load were similar in both groups. The mean follow-up was 33 months in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group and 31 months in the entecavir group. In patients treated with entecavir, there was no statistically significant difference between baseline and second bone mineral density including lumbar spine (L) and total hip T score. In patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, there was a significant difference in the second bone mineral density compared with baseline bone mineral density for L3 (P = .033) and the major fracture risk assessment tool score (P = .03). When patients were divided into 3 groups (normal bone mineral density, osteopenic, and osteoporotic), there was a significant increase in the number of osteopenic patients in the total hip T score after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment (P = .034).

Conclusion: Our results suggest a decrease in the bone mineral density for lumbar spine (L3), an increase in the number of patients with hip osteopenia, and major fracture risk assessment tool score after long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment in patients with rechronic hepatitis B.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

替诺福韦和恩替卡韦长期治疗对慢性乙型肝炎患者骨密度的影响。
背景:我们旨在探讨富马酸替诺福韦二oproxil联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者骨密度的长期影响,并评估其骨折风险评估工具评分。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入2012 - 2016年接受富马酸替诺福韦二oproxil和恩替卡韦治疗的58例慢性乙型肝炎患者(n = 40)和恩替卡韦(n = 18)。为了评估骨密度,所有患者在基线和研究结束时分别进行了双x线吸收仪、骨折风险评估工具和实验室检查。结果:两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、纤维化评分和病毒载量相似。富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯组平均随访时间为33个月,恩替卡韦组平均随访时间为31个月。在接受恩替卡韦治疗的患者中,基线和第二骨密度(包括腰椎(L)和髋部总T评分)之间无统计学差异。在接受富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯治疗的患者中,L3的第二骨密度与基线骨密度相比有显著差异(P = 0.033),主要骨折风险评估工具评分(P = 0.03)。将患者分为骨密度正常组、骨质减少组和骨质疏松组,富马酸替诺福韦二氧proxil治疗后,髋关节总T评分中骨质减少组人数显著增加(P = 0.034)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,慢性乙型肝炎患者长期接受富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯治疗后,腰椎(L3)骨密度下降,髋部骨质减少患者数量增加,主要骨折风险评估工具评分增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信