The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial.

IF 5.5
Rebecca A Jones, Julia Mueller, Stephen J Sharp, Ann Vincent, Robbie Duschinsky, Simon J Griffin, Amy L Ahern
{"title":"The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Rebecca A Jones, Julia Mueller, Stephen J Sharp, Ann Vincent, Robbie Duschinsky, Simon J Griffin, Amy L Ahern","doi":"10.1186/s12966-021-01216-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low attendance and engagement in behavioural weight management trials are common. Mental health may play an important role, however previous research exploring this association is limited with inconsistent findings. We aimed to investigate whether mental health was associated with attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary data analysis of the Weight loss referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP) trial, which randomised 1267 adults with overweight or obesity to brief intervention, WW (formerly Weight Watchers) for 12-weeks, or WW for 52-weeks. We used regression analyses to assess the association of baseline mental health (depression and anxiety (by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (by EQ5D), satisfaction with life (by Satisfaction with Life Questionnaire)) with programme attendance and engagement in WW groups, and trial attendance in all randomised groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Every one unit of baseline depression score was associated with a 1% relative reduction in rate of WW session attendance in the first 12 weeks (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.99; 95% CI 0.98, 0.999). Higher baseline anxiety was associated with 4% lower odds to report high engagement with WW digital tools (Odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% CI 0.94, 0.99). Every one unit of global quality of life was associated with 69% lower odds of reporting high engagement with the WW mobile app (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15, 0.64). Greater symptoms of depression and anxiety and lower satisfaction with life at baseline were consistently associated with lower odds of attending study visits at 3-, 12-, 24-, and 60-months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants were less likely to attend programme sessions, engage with resources, and attend study assessments when reporting poorer baseline mental health. Differences in attendance and engagement were small, however changes may still have a meaningful effect on programme effectiveness and trial completion. Future research should investigate strategies to maximise attendance and engagement in those reporting poorer mental health.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The original trial ( ISRCTN82857232 ) and five year follow up ( ISRCTN64986150 ) were prospectively registered with Current Controlled Trials on 15/10/2012 and 01/02/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":520799,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","volume":" ","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8574009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01216-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low attendance and engagement in behavioural weight management trials are common. Mental health may play an important role, however previous research exploring this association is limited with inconsistent findings. We aimed to investigate whether mental health was associated with attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes.

Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of the Weight loss referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP) trial, which randomised 1267 adults with overweight or obesity to brief intervention, WW (formerly Weight Watchers) for 12-weeks, or WW for 52-weeks. We used regression analyses to assess the association of baseline mental health (depression and anxiety (by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (by EQ5D), satisfaction with life (by Satisfaction with Life Questionnaire)) with programme attendance and engagement in WW groups, and trial attendance in all randomised groups.

Results: Every one unit of baseline depression score was associated with a 1% relative reduction in rate of WW session attendance in the first 12 weeks (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.99; 95% CI 0.98, 0.999). Higher baseline anxiety was associated with 4% lower odds to report high engagement with WW digital tools (Odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% CI 0.94, 0.99). Every one unit of global quality of life was associated with 69% lower odds of reporting high engagement with the WW mobile app (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15, 0.64). Greater symptoms of depression and anxiety and lower satisfaction with life at baseline were consistently associated with lower odds of attending study visits at 3-, 12-, 24-, and 60-months.

Conclusions: Participants were less likely to attend programme sessions, engage with resources, and attend study assessments when reporting poorer baseline mental health. Differences in attendance and engagement were small, however changes may still have a meaningful effect on programme effectiveness and trial completion. Future research should investigate strategies to maximise attendance and engagement in those reporting poorer mental health.

Trial registration: The original trial ( ISRCTN82857232 ) and five year follow up ( ISRCTN64986150 ) were prospectively registered with Current Controlled Trials on 15/10/2012 and 01/02/2018.

Abstract Image

行为体重管理项目试验中参与者心理健康对出勤率和参与度的影响:WRAP随机对照试验的二次分析
背景:低出勤率和参与行为体重管理试验是常见的。心理健康可能起着重要的作用,但之前探索这种联系的研究有限,结果不一致。我们的目的是调查心理健康是否与行为体重管理项目的出勤和参与有关。方法:这是对初级保健成人减肥转诊(WRAP)试验的二级数据分析,该试验随机选取1267名超重或肥胖的成年人进行短暂干预,WW(以前的Weight Watchers)进行12周或WW进行52周。我们使用回归分析来评估基线心理健康(抑郁和焦虑(通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、生活质量(通过EQ5D)、生活满意度(通过生活满意度问卷)与WW组的项目出勤和参与以及所有随机分组的试验出勤之间的关系。结果:每一个单位的基线抑郁评分与前12周WW会议出席率相对降低1%相关(发病率比[IRR] 0.99;95% ci 0.98, 0.999)。基线焦虑越高,报告WW数字工具高度参与的几率就越低4%(优势比[OR] 0.96;95% ci 0.94, 0.99)。全球生活质量的每一个单位与报告WW移动应用程序高参与度的几率降低69%相关(OR 0.31;95% ci 0.15, 0.64)。在3、12、24和60个月时,更大的抑郁和焦虑症状以及对基线生活满意度较低与参加研究访问的几率较低始终相关。结论:当报告基线心理健康状况较差时,参与者参加项目会议、利用资源和参加研究评估的可能性较低。出席率和参与程度的差异很小,但变化仍可能对方案有效性和试验完成情况产生有意义的影响。未来的研究应该调查那些报告心理健康状况较差的人的出勤率和参与度最大化的策略。试验注册:原始试验(ISRCTN82857232)和5年随访(ISRCTN64986150)于2012年10月15日和2018年2月1日在当前对照试验中前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书