Preoperative MRI PI-RADS scores are associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-08 DOI:10.1002/pros.24280
Benjamin Pockros, Kristian D Stensland, Molly Parries, Edward Frankenberger, David Canes, Alireza Moinzadeh
{"title":"Preoperative MRI PI-RADS scores are associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology.","authors":"Benjamin Pockros,&nbsp;Kristian D Stensland,&nbsp;Molly Parries,&nbsp;Edward Frankenberger,&nbsp;David Canes,&nbsp;Alireza Moinzadeh","doi":"10.1002/pros.24280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer and improve patient selection for prostate biopsies. However, the role of PI-RADS scores in patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of PI-RADS scores with prostate cancer upstaging. Upstaging on final pathology harbors a higher risk for biochemical recurrence with important implications for additional treatments, morbidity, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients from a single high-volume institution who underwent a prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to investigate potential associations with upstaging events, defined by pT3, pT4, or N1 on final pathology. A logistic regression model was constructed for the prediction of upstaging events based on PI-RADS score, prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), and biopsy Gleason grade groups. We built receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves to measure the area under the curve of different predictive models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis. Upstaging events occurred in 137 (46.5%) of patients. On univariable analysis, patients who were upstaged on final pathology had significantly higher PI-RADS scores (odds ratio [OR] 2.34 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-3.40, p < 0.001) but similar PSA-D (OR 2.70 95% 0.94-8.43, p = 0.188) compared with patients who remained pT1 or pT2 on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, PI-RADS remained independently significantly associated with upstaging, suggesting it is an independent risk predictor for upstaging. Lymph node metastasis only occurred in patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (n = 15). Our model using PSA-D, biopsy Gleason grade, and PI-RADS had a predictive AUC of 0.69 for upstaging events, an improvement from 0.59 using biopsy Gleason grade alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PI-RADS scores are independent predictors for upstaging events and may play an important role in forecasting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Modern nomograms should be updated to include PI-RADS to predict lymph node metastases and the likelihood of biochemical recurrence more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"352-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer and improve patient selection for prostate biopsies. However, the role of PI-RADS scores in patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of PI-RADS scores with prostate cancer upstaging. Upstaging on final pathology harbors a higher risk for biochemical recurrence with important implications for additional treatments, morbidity, and mortality.

Methods: All patients from a single high-volume institution who underwent a prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to investigate potential associations with upstaging events, defined by pT3, pT4, or N1 on final pathology. A logistic regression model was constructed for the prediction of upstaging events based on PI-RADS score, prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), and biopsy Gleason grade groups. We built receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves to measure the area under the curve of different predictive models.

Results: Two hundred and ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis. Upstaging events occurred in 137 (46.5%) of patients. On univariable analysis, patients who were upstaged on final pathology had significantly higher PI-RADS scores (odds ratio [OR] 2.34 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-3.40, p < 0.001) but similar PSA-D (OR 2.70 95% 0.94-8.43, p = 0.188) compared with patients who remained pT1 or pT2 on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, PI-RADS remained independently significantly associated with upstaging, suggesting it is an independent risk predictor for upstaging. Lymph node metastasis only occurred in patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (n = 15). Our model using PSA-D, biopsy Gleason grade, and PI-RADS had a predictive AUC of 0.69 for upstaging events, an improvement from 0.59 using biopsy Gleason grade alone.

Conclusion: PI-RADS scores are independent predictors for upstaging events and may play an important role in forecasting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Modern nomograms should be updated to include PI-RADS to predict lymph node metastases and the likelihood of biochemical recurrence more accurately.

术前MRI PI-RADS评分与前列腺癌手术病理分期相关。
前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分可以帮助识别临床显著的前列腺癌,并改善患者对前列腺活检的选择。然而,PI-RADS评分在已经诊断为前列腺癌的患者中的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估PI-RADS评分与前列腺癌分期的关系。在最终病理上占上风蕴藏着更高的生化复发风险,这对额外的治疗、发病率和死亡率具有重要意义。方法:回顾性分析了2016年至2020年来自一家大容量机构的所有接受前列腺多参数磁共振成像和根治性前列腺切除术的患者。进行单变量和多变量分析,以调查由最终病理的pT3、pT4或N1定义的占位事件的潜在关联。基于PI-RADS评分、前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSA-D)和活检Gleason分级组,构建逻辑回归模型预测抢先期事件。建立受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,测量不同预测模型的曲线下面积。结果:最终分析纳入294例患者。137例(46.5%)患者发生抢期事件。在单变量分析中,在最终病理上被抢镜的患者PI-RADS评分明显更高(优势比[OR] 2.34, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.64-3.40, p)。结论:PI-RADS评分是抢镜事件的独立预测因子,可能在预测生化复发和淋巴结转移方面发挥重要作用。现代形态图应该更新,包括PI-RADS,以更准确地预测淋巴结转移和生化复发的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书