A Dialysis Center Educational Video Intervention Increases Patient Self-Efficacy and Kidney Transplant Evaluations.

Thomas A Morinelli, David J Taber, Zemin Su, James R Rodrigue, Zachary Sutton, Misty Chastain, Tiffany Thompkins Tindal, Erin Weeda, Patrick D Mauldin, Michael Casey, John Bian, Prabhakar Baliga, Derek A DuBay
{"title":"A Dialysis Center Educational Video Intervention Increases Patient Self-Efficacy and Kidney Transplant Evaluations.","authors":"Thomas A Morinelli,&nbsp;David J Taber,&nbsp;Zemin Su,&nbsp;James R Rodrigue,&nbsp;Zachary Sutton,&nbsp;Misty Chastain,&nbsp;Tiffany Thompkins Tindal,&nbsp;Erin Weeda,&nbsp;Patrick D Mauldin,&nbsp;Michael Casey,&nbsp;John Bian,&nbsp;Prabhakar Baliga,&nbsp;Derek A DuBay","doi":"10.1177/15269248211064882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is renal transplant. However, only 1 in 5 (21.5%) patients nationwide receiving dialysis are on a transplant waitlist. Factors associated with patients not initiating a transplant evaluation are complex and include patient specific factors such as transplant knowledge and self-efficacy. <b>Research Question:</b> Can a dialysis center-based educational video intervention increase dialysis patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and transplant evaluations initiated? <b>Design:</b> Dialysis patients who had not yet completed a transplant evaluation were provided a transplant educational video while receiving hemodialysis. Patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy to initiate an evaluation, and dialysis center rates of transplant referral and evaluation were assessed before and after this intervention. <b>Results:</b> Of 340 patients approached at 14 centers, 252 (74%) completed the intervention. The intervention increased transplant knowledge (Likert scale 1 to 5: 2.53 [0.10] vs 4.62 [0.05], <i>P</i> < .001) and transplant self-efficacy (2.55 [0.10] to 4.33 [0.07], <i>P</i> < .001. The incidence rate per 100 patient years of transplant evaluations increased 85% (IRR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.35], <i>P</i> = .0422) following the intervention. The incidence rates of referrals also increased 56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], <i>P</i> = .0352), while there was a nonsignificant 47% increase in incidence rates of waitlist entries (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], <i>P</i> = .5210). <b>Conclusion:</b> This dialysis center-based video intervention provides promising preliminary evidence to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness in increasing self-efficacy of dialysis patients to initiate a transplant evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":346415,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248211064882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is renal transplant. However, only 1 in 5 (21.5%) patients nationwide receiving dialysis are on a transplant waitlist. Factors associated with patients not initiating a transplant evaluation are complex and include patient specific factors such as transplant knowledge and self-efficacy. Research Question: Can a dialysis center-based educational video intervention increase dialysis patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and transplant evaluations initiated? Design: Dialysis patients who had not yet completed a transplant evaluation were provided a transplant educational video while receiving hemodialysis. Patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy to initiate an evaluation, and dialysis center rates of transplant referral and evaluation were assessed before and after this intervention. Results: Of 340 patients approached at 14 centers, 252 (74%) completed the intervention. The intervention increased transplant knowledge (Likert scale 1 to 5: 2.53 [0.10] vs 4.62 [0.05], P < .001) and transplant self-efficacy (2.55 [0.10] to 4.33 [0.07], P < .001. The incidence rate per 100 patient years of transplant evaluations increased 85% (IRR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.35], P = .0422) following the intervention. The incidence rates of referrals also increased 56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], P = .0352), while there was a nonsignificant 47% increase in incidence rates of waitlist entries (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], P = .5210). Conclusion: This dialysis center-based video intervention provides promising preliminary evidence to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness in increasing self-efficacy of dialysis patients to initiate a transplant evaluation.

透析中心教育视频干预提高患者自我效能和肾移植评估。
终末期肾病的最佳治疗方法是肾移植。然而,全国只有五分之一(21.5%)接受透析的患者在移植等待名单上。患者不进行移植评估的相关因素是复杂的,包括患者特定的因素,如移植知识和自我效能感。研究问题:以透析中心为基础的教育视频干预能否提高透析患者的移植知识、自我效能感和对移植的评估?设计:尚未完成移植评估的透析患者在接受血液透析的同时提供移植教育视频。评估干预前后患者的移植知识、启动评估的自我效能感、透析中心移植转诊和评估率。结果:在14个中心的340例患者中,252例(74%)完成了干预。干预后移植知识增加(李克特量表1 ~ 5:2.53 [0.10]vs 4.62 [0.05], P P P = 0.0422)。转诊的发生率也增加了56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], P = 0.0352),而等候名单的发生率增加了47% (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], P = 0.5210)。结论:这种基于透析中心的视频干预提供了有希望的初步证据,可以进行大规模随机对照试验,以测试其在提高透析患者自我效能以启动移植评估方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信