Drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and B-cell counts were not predictive of response in rheumatoid arthritis patients on (ultra-)low-dose rituximab.

Maike H M Wientjes, Titia M G Gijzen, Nathan den Broeder, Karien Bloem, Annick de Vries, Bart J F van den Bemt, Alfons A den Broeder, Lise M Verhoef
{"title":"Drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and B-cell counts were not predictive of response in rheumatoid arthritis patients on (ultra-)low-dose rituximab.","authors":"Maike H M Wientjes,&nbsp;Titia M G Gijzen,&nbsp;Nathan den Broeder,&nbsp;Karien Bloem,&nbsp;Annick de Vries,&nbsp;Bart J F van den Bemt,&nbsp;Alfons A den Broeder,&nbsp;Lise M Verhoef","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keac024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The REDO trial (REtreatment with Rituximab in RhEumatoid arthritis: Disease Outcome after Dose Optimisation) showed that ultra-low-dose rituximab (500 mg or 200 mg) was similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in the majority of RA patients. This pre-planned secondary analysis investigated (1) associations between rituximab dosage, drug levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and B-cell counts and (2) the predictive value of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and of patient, disease and treatment characteristics in relation to response to ultra-low-dose rituximab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 140 RA patients from the REDO trial, differences in drug levels, ADAs and B-cell counts were examined at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after dosing. Treatment response was defined as absence of flare and no extra rituximab or >1 glucocorticoid injection received during follow-up. The association between potential predictors and response was investigated using logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower doses of rituximab resulted in lower drug levels but did not significantly affect ADA levels or B-cell counts, and 3 (10.7%), 12 (20.7%) and 7 (13.0%) patients failed to meet the response criteria in, respectively, the 1000 mg, 500 mg and 200 mg dosage groups. Drug levels, ADAs, B-cell counts, and patient, disease and treatment characteristics were not predictive for response to ultra-low-dose rituximab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study further support the hypothesis that continued treatment with 500 or 200 mg rituximab is similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in RA patients doing well on rituximab. These results, combined with lack of finding a clinical dose-response relationship in the original REDO study, suggest that 200 mg rituximab is not yet the lowest effective rituximab retreatment dose in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":379078,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"3974-3980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: The REDO trial (REtreatment with Rituximab in RhEumatoid arthritis: Disease Outcome after Dose Optimisation) showed that ultra-low-dose rituximab (500 mg or 200 mg) was similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in the majority of RA patients. This pre-planned secondary analysis investigated (1) associations between rituximab dosage, drug levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and B-cell counts and (2) the predictive value of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and of patient, disease and treatment characteristics in relation to response to ultra-low-dose rituximab.

Methods: For 140 RA patients from the REDO trial, differences in drug levels, ADAs and B-cell counts were examined at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after dosing. Treatment response was defined as absence of flare and no extra rituximab or >1 glucocorticoid injection received during follow-up. The association between potential predictors and response was investigated using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Lower doses of rituximab resulted in lower drug levels but did not significantly affect ADA levels or B-cell counts, and 3 (10.7%), 12 (20.7%) and 7 (13.0%) patients failed to meet the response criteria in, respectively, the 1000 mg, 500 mg and 200 mg dosage groups. Drug levels, ADAs, B-cell counts, and patient, disease and treatment characteristics were not predictive for response to ultra-low-dose rituximab.

Conclusion: The results of this study further support the hypothesis that continued treatment with 500 or 200 mg rituximab is similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in RA patients doing well on rituximab. These results, combined with lack of finding a clinical dose-response relationship in the original REDO study, suggest that 200 mg rituximab is not yet the lowest effective rituximab retreatment dose in RA.

药物水平、抗药物抗体和b细胞计数不能预测类风湿关节炎患者使用(超)低剂量利妥昔单抗的反应。
目的:REDO试验(利妥昔单抗治疗类风湿性关节炎:剂量优化后的疾病结局)显示,在大多数RA患者中,超低剂量利妥昔单抗(500 mg或200 mg)与1000 mg剂量同样有效。这项预先计划的二级分析研究了(1)利妥昔单抗剂量、药物水平、抗药物抗体(ADAs)和b细胞计数之间的关系;(2)药代动力学和药效学参数的预测值,以及与超低剂量利妥昔单抗反应相关的患者、疾病和治疗特征。方法:对来自REDO试验的140例RA患者,在基线、给药后3个月和6个月检查药物水平、ADAs和b细胞计数的差异。治疗反应被定义为没有耀斑,随访期间没有额外接受利妥昔单抗或>1次糖皮质激素注射。使用逻辑回归分析调查潜在预测因素与反应之间的关系。结果:低剂量利妥昔单抗降低了药物水平,但对ADA水平和b细胞计数没有显著影响,1000 mg、500 mg和200 mg剂量组分别有3例(10.7%)、12例(20.7%)和7例(13.0%)患者未达到缓解标准。药物水平、ADAs、b细胞计数、患者、疾病和治疗特征不能预测对超低剂量利妥昔单抗的反应。结论:本研究结果进一步支持了500或200 mg利妥昔单抗持续治疗与1000 mg利妥昔单抗治疗效果相似的假设。这些结果,再加上在最初的REDO研究中没有发现临床剂量-反应关系,表明200mg利妥昔单抗还不是RA的最低有效利妥昔单抗再治疗剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书